Cookies Policy

This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies.

I accept this policy

Find out more here

Behavioral Dynamics of Rhythm and Meter Perception: The Effect of Musical Expertise in Deviance Detection

No metrics data to plot.
The attempt to load metrics for this article has failed.
The attempt to plot a graph for these metrics has failed.
The full text of this article is not currently available.

Brill’s MyBook program is exclusively available on BrillOnline Books and Journals. Students and scholars affiliated with an institution that has purchased a Brill E-Book on the BrillOnline platform automatically have access to the MyBook option for the title(s) acquired by the Library. Brill MyBook is a print-on-demand paperback copy which is sold at a favorably uniform low price.

Access this article

+ Tax (if applicable)
Add to Favorites
You must be logged in to use this functionality

image of Timing & Time Perception

In two behavioral experiments, we explored effects of long-term musical training on the implicit processing of temporal structures (rhythm, non-rhythm and meter), manipulating deviance detection under different conditions. We used a task that did not require an explicit processing of the temporal aspect of stimuli, as this was irrelevant for the task. In Experiment 1, we investigated whether long-term musical training results in a superior processing of auditory rhythm, and thus boosts the detection of auditory deviants inserted within rhythmic compared to non-rhythmic auditory series. In Experiment 2, we focused on the influence of the metrical positions of a rhythmic series, and we compared musicians and non-musicians’ responses to deviant sounds inserted on strong versus weak metrical positions. We hypothesized that musicians would show enhanced rhythmic processing as compared to non-musicians. Furthermore, we hypothesized that musicians’ expectancy level would differ more across metrical positions compared to non-musicians. In both experiments, musicians were faster and more sensitive than non-musicians. Although both groups were overall faster and showed a higher sensitivity for the detection of deviants in rhythmic compared to non-rhythmic series (Experiment 1), only musicians were faster in the detection of deviants on strong positions compared to weak ones (Experiment 2). While rhythm modulates deviance processing also in non-musicians, specific effects of long-term musical training arise when a refined comparison of hierarchical metrical positions is considered. This suggests that long-term musical training enhances sensitivity to the metrical structure and improves temporal prediction mechanisms, even during implicit processing of meter.

Affiliations: 1: Center for Mind/Brain Sciences (CIMeC), University of Trento, Italy ; 2: Department of Psychology and Cognitive Sciences, University of Trento, Italy ; 3: Integrative Multisensory Perception Action and Cognition team (ImpAct), Centre de Recherche en Neurosciences de Lyon (CRNL), France


Full text loading...


Data & Media loading...

1. Bendixen A. (2014). "Predictability effects in auditory scene analysis: A review", Front. Neurosci. 8, 60. doi: 10.3389/fnins.2014.00060.
2. Besson M.,, Faïta F.,, & Requin J. (1994). "Brain waves associated with musical incongruities differ for musicians and non-musicians", Neurosci. Lett. 168, 101105.
3. Bolton T. L. (1894). "Rhythm", Am. J. Psychol. 6, 145238.
4. Boot W. R.,, Kramer A. F.,, Simons D. J.,, Fabiani M.,, & Gratton G. (2008). "The effects of video game playing on attention, memory, and executive control", Acta Psychol. 129, 387398.
5. Boot W. R.,, Blakely D. P.,, & Simons D. J. (2011). "Do action video games improve perception and cognition?" Front. Psychol. 2, 226. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2011.00226.
6. Bouwer F. L.,, & Honing H. (2015). "Temporal attending and prediction influence the perception of metrical rhythm: Evidence from reaction times and ERPs", Front. Psychol. 6, 1094. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2015.01094.
7. Bouwer F. L.,, Werner C. M.,, Knetemann M.,, & Honing H. (2016). "Disentangling beat perception from sequential learning and examining the influence of attention and musical abilities on ERP responses to rhythm". Neuropsychologia 85, 8090.
8. Brochard R.,, Dufour A.,, & Despres O. (2004). "Effect of musical expertise on visuospatial abilities: Evidence from reaction times and mental imagery", Brain Cogn. 54, 103109.
9. Cook P.,, Rouse A.,, Wilson M.,, & Reichmuth C. (2013). "A California sea lion (Zalophus californianus) can keep the beat: Motor entrainment to rhythmic auditory stimuli in a non vocal mimic", J. Comp. Psychol. 127(4), 412427.
10. Elliott M. T.,, Wing A. M.,, & Welchman A. E. (2014). "Moving in time: Bayesian causal inference explains movement coordination to auditory beats", Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B Biol. Sci. 281(1786), 20140751. doi: 10.1098/rspb.2014.0751.
11. Fitch W. (2013). "Rhythmic cognition in humans and animals: distinguishing meter and pulse perception", Front. Syst. Neurosci. 7, 68. doi: 10.3389/fnsys.2013.00068.
12. Friston K. (2005). "A theory of cortical responses", Phil. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. B Biol. Sci. 360(1456), 815836.
13. Geiser E.,, Ziegler E.,, Jancke L.,, & Meyer M. (2009). "Early electrophysiological correlates of meter and rhythm processing in music perception", Cortex 45, 93102.
14. Geiser E.,, Sandmann P.,, Jäncke L.,, & Meyer M. (2010). "Refinement of metre perception — Training increases hierarchical metre processing", Eur. J. Neurosci. 32, 19791985.
15. Grahn J. A.,, & Rowe J. B. (2009). "Feeling the beat: Premotor and striatal interactions in musicians and nonmusicians during beat perception", J. Neurosci. 29, 75407548.
16. Herholz S. C.,, & Zatorre R. J. (2012). "Musical training as a framework for brain plasticity: behavior, function, and structure", Neuron 76, 486502.
17. Honing H. (2012). "Without it no music: Beat induction as a fundamental musical trait", Ann. N. Y. Acad. Sci. 1252, 8591.
18. Jones M. R.,, & Boltz M. (1989). "Dynamic attending and responses to time", Psychol. Rev. 96, 459491.
19. Jones M. R.,, Moynihan H.,, MacKenzie N.,, & Puente J. (2002). "Temporal aspects of stimulus-driven attending in dynamic arrays", Psychol. Sci. 13, 313319.
20. Jongsma M. L.,, Desain P.,, Honing H.,, & van Rijn C. M. (2003). "Evoked potentials to test rhythm perception theories", Ann. N. Y. Acad. Sci. 999, 180183.
21. Jongsma M. L.,, Desain P.,, & Honing H. (2004). "Rhythmic context influences the auditory evoked potentials of musicians and nonmusicians", Biol. Psychol. 66, 129152.
22. Klein C.,, Liem F.,, Hänggi J.,, Elmer S.,, & Jäncke L. (2016). "The ‘silent’ imprint of musical training", Hum. brain Mapp. 37, 536546.
23. Large E. W. (2000). "On synchronizing movements to music", Hum. Mov. Sci. 19, 527566.
24. Large E. W.,, & Jones M. R. (1999). "The dynamics of attending: How people track time-varying events", Psychol. Rev. 106, 119159.
25. Large E. W.,, & Snyder J. S. (2009). "Pulse and meter as neural resonance", Ann. N. Y. Acad. Sci. 1169, 4657.
26. Lee H.,, & Noppeney U. (2014). "Music expertise shapes audiovisual temporal integration windows for speech, sinewave speech, and music", Front Psychol. 5, 868. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2014.00868.
27. Lerdahl F.,, & Jackendoff R. (1983). "An overview of hierarchical structure in music", Music Percept. 1, 229252.
28. London J. (2012). Hearing in Time: Psychological Aspects of Musical Meter . Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
29. Luce R. D. (1986). Response Times: Their Role in Inferring Elementary Mental Organization , Oxford Psychology Series, No. 8. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press on Demand.
30. Martin J. G. (1972). "Rhythmic (hierarchical) versus serial structure in speech and other behavior", Psychol. Rev. 79, 487509.
31. Münte T. F.,, Altenmüller E.,, & Jäncke L. (2002). "The musician’s brain as a model of neuroplasticity", Nat. Rev. Neurosci. 3, 473478.
32. Ono K.,, Altmann C. F.,, Matsuhashi M.,, Mima T.,, & Fukuyama H. (2015). "Neural correlates of perceptual grouping effects in the processing of sound omission by musicians and nonmusicians", Hear. Res. 319, 2531.
33. Parncutt R. (1994). "A perceptual model of pulse salience and metrical accent in musical rhythms", Music Percept. 11, 409464.
34. Patel A. D.,, Iversen J. R.,, Bregman M. R.,, & Schulz I. (2009). "Experimental evidence for synchronization to a musical beat in a nonhuman animal", Curr. Biol. 19, 827830.
35. Rohrmeier M. A.,, & Koelsch S. (2012). "Predictive information processing in music cognition. A critical review", Int. J. Psychophysiol. 83, 164175.
36. Schwartze M.,, Rothermich K.,, Schmidt-Kassow M.,, & Kotz S. A. (2011). "Temporal regularity effects on pre-attentive and attentive processing of deviance", Biol. Psychol. 87, 146151.
37. Stanislaw H.,, & Todorov N. (1999). "Calculation of signal detection theory measures", Behav. Res. Meth. Instrum. Comput. 31, 137149.
38. Thaut M. H.,, Trimarchi P. D.,, & Parsons L. M. (2014). "Human brain basis of musical rhythm perception: Common and distinct neural substrates for meter, tempo, and pattern", Brain Sci. 4, 428452.
39. Vuust P.,, & Witek M. A. (2014). "Rhythmic complexity and predictive coding: A novel approach to modeling rhythm and meter perception in music", Front. Psychol. 5, 1111. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2014.01111.
40. Vuust P.,, Pallesen K. J.,, Bailey C.,, van Zuijen T. L.,, Gjedde A.,, Roepstorff A.,, & Østergaard L. (2005). "To musicians, the message is in the meter: Pre-attentive neuronal responses to incongruent rhythm are left-lateralized in musicians", Neuroimage 24, 560564.
41. Vuust P.,, Ostergaard L.,, Pallesen K. J.,, Bailey C.,, & Roepstorff A. (2009). "Predictive coding of music–brain responses to rhythmic incongruity", Cortex 45, 8092.
42. Wallentin M.,, Nielsen A. H.,, Friis-Olivarius M.,, Vuust C.,, & Vuust P. (2010). "The Musical Ear Test, a new reliable test for measuring musical competence". Learn. Individ. Differ. 20, 188196.
43. Wallin N. L.,, & Merker B. (2001). The Origins of Music . Cambridge, MA, USA: MIT Press.
44. Winkler I.,, Háden G. P.,, Ladinig O.,, Sziller I.,, & Honing H. (2009). "Newborn infants detect the beat in music", Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. 106, 24682471.
45. Woodrow H. (1909). A Quantitative Study of Rhythm: The Effect of Variations in Intensity, Rate and Duration , Archives of Psychology No. 14. New York, NY, USA: Science Press.

Article metrics loading...



Can't access your account?
  • Tools

  • Add to Favorites
  • Printable version
  • Email this page
  • Subscribe to ToC alert
  • Get permissions
  • Recommend to your library

    You must fill out fields marked with: *

    Librarian details
    Your details
    Why are you recommending this title?
    Select reason:
    Timing & Time Perception — Recommend this title to your library
  • Export citations
  • Key

  • Full access
  • Open Access
  • Partial/No accessInformation