Cookies Policy
X

This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies.

I accept this policy

Find out more here

The Otherness in Comparative Constitutional Law

No metrics data to plot.
The attempt to load metrics for this article has failed.
The attempt to plot a graph for these metrics has failed.
The full text of this article is not currently available.

Brill’s MyBook program is exclusively available on BrillOnline Books and Journals. Students and scholars affiliated with an institution that has purchased a Brill E-Book on the BrillOnline platform automatically have access to the MyBook option for the title(s) acquired by the Library. Brill MyBook is a print-on-demand paperback copy which is sold at a favorably uniform low price.

Access this article

+ Tax (if applicable)
Add to Favorites
You must be logged in to use this functionality

How Comparative Constitutional Law Comes to be Seen When Taught in English as the Medium of Instruction

Comparative Constitutional Law (CCL) has known a renaissance in the last decades. Nonetheless, it is still haunted by the apprehension of amounting to an abundant collection of valuable materials illustrating constitutional enterprises without an established and uncontroversial methodology. Should political science come to rescue the legal doctrine when it cannot grasp the variables influencing constitutional dynamics? What intellectual understanding should CCL serve? Does CCL shift from the treatment of specific topics to general themes? In my experience, both methodologies and main stream interests in CCL are critically tested in an English as a Medium of Instruction (EMI)-teaching environment: that is the reason why EMI-taught CCL courses may turn into useful opportunities to scrutinize the canon we have been developing. In this Article, I will try to offer a few examples of how the EMI-teaching of CCL may contribute to identify a methodological guidance and a latitude of investigation.

Affiliations: 1: Associate professor of Comparative Constitutional Law at the University of Macerata; Fellow at the Max Planck Institute for Comparative Public Law and International Law, Heidelberg. b.barbisan@gmail.com; benedetta.barbisan@unimc.it

10.1163/22134514-00402002
/content/journals/10.1163/22134514-00402002
dcterms_title,pub_keyword,dcterms_description,pub_author
10
5
Loading
Loading

Full text loading...

/content/journals/10.1163/22134514-00402002
Loading

Data & Media loading...

http://brill.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journals/10.1163/22134514-00402002
Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1163/22134514-00402002
2017-07-12
2018-09-26

Sign-in

Can't access your account?
  • Tools

  • Add to Favorites
  • Printable version
  • Email this page
  • Subscribe to ToC alert
  • Get permissions
  • Recommend to your library

    You must fill out fields marked with: *

    Librarian details
    Your details
    Why are you recommending this title?
    Select reason:
     
    European Journal of Comparative Law and Governance — Recommend this title to your library
  • Export citations
  • Key

  • Full access
  • Open Access
  • Partial/No accessInformation