Cookies Policy
X

This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies.

I accept this policy

Find out more here

Open Access Empirical Assessment of the Quality of Nationalities

No metrics data to plot.
The attempt to load metrics for this article has failed.
The attempt to plot a graph for these metrics has failed.
The full text of this article is not currently available.

Brill’s MyBook program is exclusively available on BrillOnline Books and Journals. Students and scholars affiliated with an institution that has purchased a Brill E-Book on the BrillOnline platform automatically have access to the MyBook option for the title(s) acquired by the Library. Brill MyBook is a print-on-demand paperback copy which is sold at a favorably uniform low price.

Empirical Assessment of the Quality of Nationalities

  • PDF
  • HTML
Add to Favorites
You must be logged in to use this functionality

image of European Journal of Comparative Law and Governance

Contemporary thinking about nationality is surrounded by three persistent mythologies. First, all nationalities are equal. Second, there is a direct correlation between the power and size of the economy of a country and the quality of its nationality. Third, there is a correlation between the geographical scope of the rights granted by a nationality and the territory of the conferring state. Looking beyond the subjective feelings one may have towards one’s nationality, the widely diverging quality of nationalities can in fact be measured. In the Quality of Nationality Index, which this article introduces and discusses, an attempt has been made to develop and deploy a reliable and straightforward methodology to measure objectively the value of having a particular nationality, which would not be perception-based. Nationalities are not equal, at least not under the assumption that the level of expected welfare, education, healthcare, life chances, and global travel and settlement opportunities matter.

Affiliations: 1: Chair in EU Constitutional Law, Faculty of Law, University of Groningen, d.kochenov@rug.nl ; 2: Doctoral researcher and lecturer, Faculty of Law, University of Groningen, j.lindeboom@rug.nl

10.1163/22134514-00404007
/content/journals/10.1163/22134514-00404007
dcterms_title,pub_keyword,dcterms_description,pub_author
10
5
Loading

Contemporary thinking about nationality is surrounded by three persistent mythologies. First, all nationalities are equal. Second, there is a direct correlation between the power and size of the economy of a country and the quality of its nationality. Third, there is a correlation between the geographical scope of the rights granted by a nationality and the territory of the conferring state. Looking beyond the subjective feelings one may have towards one’s nationality, the widely diverging quality of nationalities can in fact be measured. In the Quality of Nationality Index, which this article introduces and discusses, an attempt has been made to develop and deploy a reliable and straightforward methodology to measure objectively the value of having a particular nationality, which would not be perception-based. Nationalities are not equal, at least not under the assumption that the level of expected welfare, education, healthcare, life chances, and global travel and settlement opportunities matter.

Loading

Full text loading...

/deliver/journals/22134514/4/4/22134514_004_04_s002_text.html?itemId=/content/journals/10.1163/22134514-00404007&mimeType=html&fmt=ahah
/content/journals/10.1163/22134514-00404007
Loading

Data & Media loading...

http://brill.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journals/10.1163/22134514-00404007
Loading
Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1163/22134514-00404007
2017-12-13
2018-09-19

Sign-in

Can't access your account?
  • Key

  • Full access
  • Open Access
  • Partial/No accessInformation