No metrics data to plot.
The attempt to load metrics for this article has failed.
The attempt to plot a graph for these metrics has failed.
The full text of this article is not currently available.
You must be logged in to use this functionality
In audiotactile dynamic capture, judgment of the direction of an apparent motion stream (such as auditory motion) was impeded (hence ‘captured’) by the presentation of a concurrent, but directionally opposite apparent motion stream (such as tactile motion) from a distractor modality, leading to a cross-modal dynamic capture (CDC) effect. That is to say, the percentage of correct reporting of the direction of the target motion was reduced. Previous studies have revealed the effect of stimulus onset asynchronies (SOAs) and the potential spatial remapping (by adopting a cross-hands posture) in CDC. However, further exploration of the dynamic capture process under different postures was not available due to the fact that only two levels of time asynchronies were employed (either synchronous or with an SOA of 500 ms). This study introduced a broad range of SOAs (−400 ms to 400 ms, tactile stream preceded auditory stream or vice versa) to explore the time course of audio-tactile interaction in CDC with two spatial references — arms-uncrossed or arms-crossed postures. Participants judged the direction of auditory apparent motion with tactile distractors. The results showed that in the arms-uncrossed condition, the CDC effect was prominent when the auditory–tactile events were in the temporal integration window (0–60 ms). However, with a preceding tactile cueing effect of SOA equal to and above 150 ms, the CDC effect was reduced, and no CDC effect was observed with the arms-crossed posture. These results suggest CDC effect is modulated by both cross-modal interaction and the spatial reference (especially for the distractors). The magnitude of the CDC effects in audiotactile interaction may be accounted for by reliability of tactile spatial-temporal information.
Full text loading...
Ernst M. O. , Banks M. S. ( 2002). "Humans integrate visual and haptic information in a statistically optimal fashion", Nature Vol 415, 429– 433. http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/415429a
Jiang Y. , Chen L. ( 2013). "Mutual influences of intermodal visual/tactile apparent motion and auditory motion with uncrossed and crossed arms", Multisensory Res. Vol 26, 19– 51. http://dx.doi.org/10.1163/22134808-00002409
Lloyd D. M. , Merat N. , McGlone F. , Spence C. ( 2003). "Crossmodal links between audition and touch in covert endogenous spatial attention", Percept. Psychophys. Vol 65, 901– 924. http://dx.doi.org/10.3758/BF03194823
Los S. A. , Van der Burg E. ( 2013). "Sound speeds vision through preparation, not integration", J. Exp. Psychol. Hum. Percept. Perform. Vol 39, 1612– 1624. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/a0032183
Pöppel E. , Bao Y. ( ). "Temporal windows as a bridge from objective to subjective time", in: Subjective Time, Lloyd D. , Arstila V. (Eds). MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, USA.
Sanabria D. , Soto-Faraco S. , Spence C. ( 2007a). "Spatial attention modulates audiovisual interactions in apparent motion", J. Exp. Psychol. Hum. Percept. Perform. Vol 33, 927– 937. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0096-15220.127.116.117
Sanabria D. , Spence C. , Soto-Faraco S. ( 2007b). "Perceptual and decisional contributions to audiovisual interactions in the perception of motion: a signal detection study", Cognition Vol 102, 299– 310. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2006.01.003
Shore D. I. , Gray K. , Spry E. , Spence C. ( 2005). "Spatial modulation of tactile temporal-order judgments", Perception Vol 34, 1251– 1262. http://dx.doi.org/10.1068/p3313
Soto-Faraco S. , Lyons J. , Gazzaniga M. , Spence C. , Kingstone A. ( 2002). "The ventriloquist in motion: illusory capture of dynamic information across sensory modalities", Brain Res. Cogn. Brain Res. Vol 14, 139– 146. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0926-6410(02)00068-X
Soto-Faraco S. , Spence C. , Kingstone A. ( 2004). "Congruency effects between auditory and tactile motion: extending the phenomenon of cross-modal dynamic capture", Cogn. Affect. Behav. Neurosci. Vol 4, 208– 217. http://dx.doi.org/10.3758/CABN.4.2.208
Spence C. , Nicholls M. E. , Gillespie N. , Driver J. ( 1998). "Cross-modal links in exogenous covert spatial orienting between touch, audition and vision", Percept. Psychophys. Vol 60, 544– 557. http://dx.doi.org/10.3758/BF03206045
Yamamoto S. , Kitazawa S. ( 2001). "Reversal of subjective temporal order due to arm crossing", Nat. Neurosci. Vol 4, 759– 765. http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/89559