Cookies Policy

This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies.

I accept this policy

Find out more here

Assessing the Role of Taste Intensity and Hedonics in Taste–Shape Correspondences

No metrics data to plot.
The attempt to load metrics for this article has failed.
The attempt to plot a graph for these metrics has failed.
The full text of this article is not currently available.

Brill’s MyBook program is exclusively available on BrillOnline Books and Journals. Students and scholars affiliated with an institution that has purchased a Brill E-Book on the BrillOnline platform automatically have access to the MyBook option for the title(s) acquired by the Library. Brill MyBook is a print-on-demand paperback copy which is sold at a favorably uniform low price.

Access this article

+ Tax (if applicable)
Add to Favorites
You must be logged in to use this functionality

image of Multisensory Research
For more content, see Seeing and Perceiving and Spatial Vision.

Taste liking influences the way in which people match tastes to shapes. However, taste–shape matching cannot be explained entirely by taste hedonics. Here, we assess whether variations in taste intensity influence such crossmodal correspondences. Participants were presented with five basic tastants in two concentrations and had to rate them on roundness/angularity shape scales, as well as in terms of liking, and intensity. The results revealed that taste quality, intensity, and participants’ liking of the taste significantly predicted the roundness/angularity of the tastants. The results also revealed a positive correlation between perceived intensity and roundness/angularity for each of the tastants except sweet, and a negative correlation between liking and roundness/angularity for all of the tastes. These results are discussed in terms of the mechanism(s) that underlie the crossmodal correspondence between taste and shape.

Affiliations: 1: 1Crossmodal Research Laboratory, Department of Experimental Psychology, University of Oxford, Oxford OX1 3UD, UK; 2: 2Xperiment, Lausanne, Switzerland


Full text loading...


Data & Media loading...

1. Bar M. , Neta M. ( 2006). "Humans prefer curved visual objects", Psychol. Sci. Vol 17, 645648.
2. Barbiere J. M. , Vidal A. , Zellner D. A. ( 2007). "The color of music: correspondence through emotion", Empir. Stud. Arts Vol 25, 193208.
3. Becker L. , van Rompay T. J. , Schifferstein H. N. , Galetzka M. ( 2011). "Tough package, strong taste: the influence of packaging design on taste impressions and product evaluations", Food Qual. Pref. Vol 22, 1723.
4. Birch L. L. ( 1999). "Development of food preferences", Annu. Rev. Nutr. Vol 19, 4162.
5. Bredie W. L. P. , Tan H. S. G. , Wendin K. ( 2014). "A comparative study on facially expressed emotions in response to basic tastes", Chemosens. Percept. Vol 7, 19.
6. Bremner A. J. , Caparos S. , Davidoff J. , de Fockert J. , Linnell K. J. , Spence C. ( 2013). "“Bouba” and “Kiki” in Namibia? A remote culture make similar shape–sound matches, but different shape–taste matches to Westerners", Cognition Vol 126, 165172.
7. Collier G. L. ( 1996). "Affective synesthesia: extracting emotion space from simple perceptual stimuli", Motiv. Emot. Vol 20, 132.
8. Crisinel A.-S. , Spence C. ( 2012). "The impact of pleasantness ratings on crossmodal associations between food samples and musical notes", Food Qual. Pref. Vol 24, 136140.
9. Deroy O. , Valentin D. ( 2011). "Tasting liquid shapes: investigating the sensory basis of cross-modal correspondences", Chemosens. Percept. Vol 4, 8090.
10. Deroy O. , Crisinel A.-S. , Spence C. ( 2013). "Crossmodal correspondences between odors and contingent features: odors, musical notes, and geometrical shapes", Psychon. Bull. Rev. Vol 20, 878896.
11. Drewnowski A. ( 1997). "Taste preferences and food intake", Annu. Rev. Nutr. Vol 17, 237253.
12. Fox J. ( 2008). Applied Regression Analysis and Generalized Linear Models. Sage Publications, Inc., Thousand Oaks, CA, USA.
13. Fushan A. A. , Simons C. T. , Slack J. P. , Manichaikul A. , Drayna D. ( 2009). "Allelic polymorphism within the tas1r3promoter is associated with human taste sensitivity to sucrose", Curr. Biol. Vol 19, 12881293.
14. Grömping U. ( 2006). "Relative importance for linear regression in R: the package relaimpo", J. Stat. Softw. Vol 17, 127.
15. Hanson-Vaux G. , Crisinel A.-S. , Spence C. ( 2013). "Smelling shapes: crossmodal correspondences between odors and shapes", Chem. Senses Vol 38, 161166.
16. Hardin J. A. , Hilbe J. M. ( 2012). Generalized Estimating Equations. Chapman and Hall, Boca Raton, FL, USA.
17. Hoehl K. , Schoenberger G. U. , Busch-Stockfisch M. ( 2010). "Water quality and taste sensitivity for basic tastes and metallic sensation", Food Qual. Pref. Vol 21, 243249.
18. Karwoski T. F. , Odbert H. S. , Osgood C. E. ( 1942). "Studies in synesthetic thinking: II. The role of form in visual responses to music", J. Gen. Psychol. Vol 26, 199222.
19. Kenneth J. H. ( 1923). "Mental reactions to smell stimuli", Psychol. Rev. Vol 30, 7779.
20. Kittler P. G. , Sucher K. P. ( 2007). Food and Culture, 5th edn. Wadsworth, Belmont, CA, USA.
21. Lindauer M. S. ( 1990). "The effects of the physiognomic stimuli taketa and maluma on the meanings of neutral stimuli", Bull. Psychon. Soc. Vol 28, 151154.
22. Lindeman R. H. , Merenda P. F. , Gold R. Z. ( 1980). Introduction to Bivariate and Multivariate Analysis. Scott Foresman, Glenview, IL, USA.
23. Lyman B. ( 1979). "Representation of complex emotional and abstract meanings by simple forms", Percept. Mot. Skills Vol 49, 839842.
24. Marks L. E. ( 1978). The Unity of the Senses: Interrelations among the Modalities. Academic Press, New York, NY, USA.
25. Marks L. E. ( 1996). "On perceptual metaphors", Metaphor Symb. Vol 11, 3966.
26. Martino G. , Marks L. E. ( 2001). "Synesthesia: strong and weak", Curr. Dir. Psychol. Sci. Vol 10, 6165.
27. Moskowitz H. R. ( 1971). "The sweetness and pleasantness of sugars", Am. J. Psych. Vol 84, 387405.
28. Moskowitz H. R. ( 1982). "Sensory intensity versus hedonic functions: classical psychophysical approaches", J. Food Qual. Vol 5, 109137.
29. Moskowitz H. R. , Kluter R. A. , Westerling J. , Jacobs H. L. ( 1974). "Sugar sweetness and pleasantness: evidence for different psychological laws", Science Vol 184, 583585.
30. Ngo M. K. , Misra R. , Spence C. ( 2011). "Assessing the shapes and speech sounds that people associate with chocolate samples varying in cocoa content", Food Qual. Pref. Vol 22, 567572.
31. Obrist M. , Comber R. , Subramanian S. , Piqueras-Fiszman B. , Velasco C. , Spence C. ( 2014). Temporal, affective, and embodied characteristics of taste experiences: a framework for design, in: Proceedings of the 32nd Annual ACM Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, Toronto, ON, Canada, pp. 2853–2862. ACM, New York, NY, USA.
32. Palmer S. E. , Schloss K. B. , Xu Z. , Prado-León L. R. ( 2013). "Music–color associations are mediated by emotion", Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA Vol 110, 88368841.
33. Parise C. , Spence C. ( 2013). "Audiovisual cross-modal correspondences in the general population", in: The Oxford Handbook of Synaesthesia, Simner J. , Hubbard E. (Eds), pp.  790815. Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK.
34. Poffenberger A. T. , Barrows B. E. ( 1924). "The feeling value of lines", J. Appl. Psych. Vol 8, 187205.
35. Prescott J. , Laing D. , Bell G. , Yoshida M. , Gillmore R. , Allen S. , Yamazaki K. , Ishii R. ( 1992). "Hedonic responses to taste solutions: a cross-cultural study of Japanese and Australians", Chem. Senses Vol 17, 801809.
36. Russell J. A. ( 2003). "Core affect and the psychological construction of emotion", Psychol. Rev. Vol 110, 145172.
37. Schifferstein H. N. J. , Spence C. ( 2008). "Multisensory product experience", in: Product Experience, Schifferstein H. N. J. , Hekkert P. (Eds), pp.  133161. Elsevier, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
38. Spence C. ( 2011). "Crossmodal correspondences: a tutorial review", Atten. Percept. Psychophys. Vol 73, 971995.
39. Spence C. ( 2012). "Managing sensory expectations concerning products and brands: capitalizing on the potential of sound and shape symbolism", J. Consum. Psychol. Vol 22, 3754.
40. Spence C. , Deroy O. ( 2013). "Tasting shapes: a review of four hypotheses", Hist. Sci. Vol 10, 207238.
41. Spence C. , Ngo M. K. ( 2012). "Assessing the shape symbolism of the taste, flavour, and texture of foods and beverages", Flavour Vol 1, 12.
42. Spence C. , Ngo M. K. , Percival B. , Smith B. ( 2013). "Crossmodal correspondences: assessing shape symbolism for cheese", Food Qual. Pref. Vol 28, 206212.
43. Steiner J. E. , Glaser D. , Hawilo M. E. , Berridge K. C. ( 2001). "Comparative expression of hedonic impact: affective reactions to taste by human infants and other primates", Neurosci. Biobehav. Rev. Vol 25, 5374.
44. Stevens S. S. ( 1957). "On the psychophysical law", Psychol. Rev. Vol 64, 153181.
45. Velasco C. , Salgado-Montejo A. , Marmolejo-Ramos F. , Spence C. ( 2014a). "Predictive packaging design: tasting shapes, typefaces, names, and sounds", Food Qual. Pref. Vol 34, 8895.
46. Velasco C. , Balboa D. , Marmolejo-Ramos F. , Spence C. ( 2014b). "Crossmodal effect of music and odor pleasantness on olfactory quality perception", Front. Psychol. Vol 5, 1352.
47. Velasco C. , Woods A. , Deroy O. , Spence C. ( 2015). "Hedonic mediation of the crossmodal correspondence between taste and shape", Food Qual. Pref. Vol 41, 151158.
48. Walker P. ( 2012). "Cross-sensory correspondences and cross talk between dimensions of connotative meaning: visual angularity is hard, high pitched, and bright", Atten. Percept. Psychophys. Vol 74, 17921809.
49. Wan X. , Woods A. T. , van den Bosch J. J. , McKenzie K. J. , Velasco C. , Spence C. ( 2014). "Cross-cultural differences in crossmodal correspondences between basic tastes and visual features", Front. Psychol. Vol 5, 1365.
50. Westerman S. J. , Gardner P. H. , Sutherland E. J. , White T. , Jordan K. , Watts D. , Wells S. ( 2012). "Product design: preference for rounded versus angular design elements", Psychol. Mark. Vol 29, 595605.
51. Yeomans M. R. , Tepper B. J. , Rietzschel J. , Prescott J. ( 2007). "Human hedonic responses to sweetness: role of taste genetics and anatomy", Physiol. Behav. Vol 91, 264273.

Article metrics loading...



Can't access your account?
  • Tools

  • Add to Favorites
  • Printable version
  • Email this page
  • Subscribe to ToC alert
  • Get permissions
  • Recommend to your library

    You must fill out fields marked with: *

    Librarian details
    Your details
    Why are you recommending this title?
    Select reason:
    Multisensory Research — Recommend this title to your library
  • Export citations
  • Key

  • Full access
  • Open Access
  • Partial/No accessInformation