Cookies Policy
X

This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies.

I accept this policy

Find out more here

Auditory and Visual Crossmodal Correspondences With Haptically Perceived Liquid Viscosity

No metrics data to plot.
The attempt to load metrics for this article has failed.
The attempt to plot a graph for these metrics has failed.
The full text of this article is not currently available.

Brill’s MyBook program is exclusively available on BrillOnline Books and Journals. Students and scholars affiliated with an institution that has purchased a Brill E-Book on the BrillOnline platform automatically have access to the MyBook option for the title(s) acquired by the Library. Brill MyBook is a print-on-demand paperback copy which is sold at a favorably uniform low price.

Access this article

+ Tax (if applicable)
Add to Favorites
You must be logged in to use this functionality

image of Multisensory Research
For more content, see Seeing and Perceiving and Spatial Vision.

Past research on crossmodal correspondences as they relate to tactile perception has largely been restricted to solid substances. We investigated the role of haptically explored liquid viscosity in crossmodal correspondences with visually presented luminance, saturation, roundedness, size, number and visual elevation, as well as pure-tone pitch and kiki–bouba-type letter strings. In Experiment 1, we presented two tactile and two visual or auditory stimuli simultaneously, and found significant inter-participant agreement (n=32) when pairing viscosity with luminance, saturation, roundedness, size, pitch and letter string type. To assess whether these crossmodal correspondences were relative or absolute, another 32 participants were presented, in Experiment 2, with two tactile stimuli but only one visual/auditory stimulus per trial. In this second experiment, we found that high viscosity was paired with low luminance, roundness, low saturation, and the bouba-type letter string, while low viscosity was paired with high pitch. However, the inverse associations (e.g. low viscosity with high luminance, high viscosity with low pitch) were not significant. These findings indicate that viscosity can be added to the list of dimensions that invoke crossmodal correspondences, and that the majority of crossmodal correspondences involving viscosity are absolute rather than relative, since they appear without explicit comparisons along the visual/auditory dimensions we measured.

Affiliations: 1: School of Psychology, University of East London, Water Lane, London E15 4LZ, UK

*To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail: c.n.jonas@uel.ac.uk
Loading

Full text loading...

/content/journals/10.1163/22134808-00002534
Loading

Data & Media loading...

1. Bach-y-Rita P., Kaczmarek K. A., Tyler M. E., Garcia-Lara J. (1998). "Form perception with a 49-point electrotactile stimulus array on the tongue: a technical note", J. Rehabil. Res. Dev. Vol 35, 427430.
2. Belkin K., Martin R., Kemp S. E., Gilbert A. N. (1997). "Auditory pitch as a perceptual analogue to odor quality", Psychol. Sci. Vol 8, 340342. [Crossref]
3. Benjamini Y., Hochberg Y. (1995). "Controlling the false discovery rate: a practical and powerful approach to multiple testing", J. R. Stat. Soc. B Methodol. Vol 57, 289300.
4. Churchill A., Meyners M., Griffiths L., Bailey P. (2009). "The cross-modal effect of fragrance in shampoo: modifying the perceived feel of both product and hair during and after washing", Food Qual. Pref. Vol 20, 320328. [Crossref]
5. Deroy O., Valentin D. (2011). "Tasting liquid shapes: investigating the sensory basis of cross-modal correspondences", Chemosens. Percept. Vol 4, 8090. [Crossref]
6. D’Onofrio A. (2014). "Phonetic detail and dimensionality in sound–shape correspondences: refining the bouba–kiki paradigm", Lang. Speech Vol 57, 367393. [Crossref]
7. Eitan Z., Rothschild I. (2010). "How music touches: musical parameters and listeners’ audio–tactile metaphorical mappings", Psychol. Music Vol 39, 449467. [Crossref]
8. Eitan Z., Timmers R. (2010). "Beethoven’s last piano sonata and those who follow crocodiles: cross-domain mappings of auditory pitch in a musical context", Cognition Vol 114, 405422. [Crossref]
9. Etzi R., Spence C., Zampini M., Gallace A. (2016). "When sandpaper is ‘Kiki’ and satin is ‘Bouba’: an exploration of the associations between words, emotional states, and the tactile attributes of everyday materials", Multisens. Res. Vol 29, 133155. [Crossref]
10. Evans K. K., Treisman A. (2010). "Natural cross-modal mappings between visual and auditory features", J. Vis. Vol 10, 6. DOI:.
11. Fox C. W. (1935). "An experimental study of naming", Am. J. Psychol. Vol 47, 545579. [Crossref]
12. Gallace A., Spence C. (2006). "Multisensory synesthetic interactions in the speeded classification of visual size", Atten. Percept. Psychophys. Vol 68, 11911203. [Crossref]
13. Gilbert A. N., Martin R., Kemp S. E. (1996). "Cross-modal correspondence between vision and olfaction: the color of smells", Am. J. Psychol. Vol 109, 335351. [Crossref]
14. Hanson-Vaux G., Crisinel A.-S., Spence C. (2013). "Smelling shapes: crossmodal correspondences between odors and shapes", Chem. Senses Vol 38, 161166. [Crossref]
15. Harrar V., Spence C. (2013). "The taste of cutlery: how the taste of food is affected by the weight, size, shape, and colour of the cutlery used to eat it", Flavour Vol 2, 21. DOI:.
16. Hevner K. (1937). "An experimental study of the affective value of sounds in poetry", Am. J. Psychol. Vol 49, 419434. [Crossref]
17. Jonas C., Spiller M. J., Hibbard P. (in prep.). Summation of visual attributes in auditory–visual crossmodal correspondences.
18. Ludden G. D. S., Van Rompay T. J. L. (2015). "How does it feel? Exploring touch on different levels of product experience", J. Eng. Design Vol 26, 157168. [Crossref]
19. Ludwig V. U., Simner J. (2013). "What colour does that feel? Tactile–visual mapping and the development of cross-modality", Cortex Vol 49, 10891099. [Crossref]
20. Marks L. E. (1987). "On cross-modal similarity: auditory–visual interactions in speeded discrimination", J. Exp. Psych. Hum. Percept. Perform. Vol 13, 384394. [Crossref]
21. Martino G., Marks L. E. (2000). "Cross-modal interaction between vision and touch: the role of synesthetic correspondence", Perception Vol 29, 745754. [Crossref]
22. Michel C., Velasco C., Spence C. (2015). "Cutlery matters: heavy cutlery enhances diners’ enjoyment of the food served in a realistic dining environment", Flavour Vol 4, 26. DOI:. [Crossref]
23. Morrot G., Brochet F., Dubourdieu D. (2001). "The color of odors", Brain Lang. Vol 79, 309320. [Crossref]
24. Nava E., Grassi M., Turati C. (2015). "Audio–visual, visuo–tactile and audio–tactile correspondences in preschoolers", Multisens. Res. Vol 289, 93111.
25. Palmer S. E., Schloss K. B., Xu Z., Prado-León L. R. (2013). "Music–color associations are mediated by emotion", Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. Vol 110, 88368841. [Crossref]
26. Parise C. V., Spence C. (2012). "Audiovisual crossmodal correspondences and sound symbolism: a study using the implicit association test", Exp. Brain Res. Vol 220, 319333. [Crossref]
27. Piqueras-Fiszman B., Spence C. (2012a). "The influence of the feel of product packaging on the perception of the oral-somatosensory texture of food", Food Qual. Pref. Vol 26, 6773. [Crossref]
28. Piqueras-Fiszman B., Spence C. (2012b). "The weight of the container influences expected satiety, perceived density, and subsequent expected fullness", Appetite Vol 58, 559562. [Crossref]
29. Risso P., Maggioni E., Olivero N., Gallace A. (2015). "The association between the colour of a container and the liquid inside: an experimental study on consumers’ perception, expectations and choices regarding mineral water", Food Qual. Pref. Vol 44, 1725. [Crossref]
30. Rudmin F., Cappelli M. (1983). "Tone–taste synaesthesia: a replication", Percept. Mot. Skills Vol 56, 118. [Crossref]
31. Seo H.-S., Arshamian A., Schemmer K., Scheer I., Sander T., Ritter G., Hummel T. (2010). "Cross-modal integration between odors and abstract symbols", Neurosci. Lett. Vol 478, 175178. [Crossref]
32. Slobodenyuk N., Jraissati Y., Kanso A., Ghanem L., Elhajj I. (2015). "Cross-modal associations between color and haptics", Atten. Percept. Psychophys. Vol 77, 13791395. [Crossref]
33. Spence C. (2011). "Crossmodal correspondences: a tutorial review", Atten. Percept. Psychophys. Vol 73, 971995. [Crossref]
34. Spence C. (2012). "Managing sensory expectations concerning products and brands: capitalizing on the potential of sound and shape symbolism", J. Consum. Psychol. Vol 22, 3754. [Crossref]
35. Spence C., Gallace A. (2011). "Multisensory design: reaching out to touch the consumer", Psychol. Mark. Vol 28, 267308. [Crossref]
36. Spence C., Hobkinson C., Gallace A., Piqueras-Fiszman B. (2013). "A touch of gastronomy", Flavour Vol 2, 14. DOI:.
37. Tu Y., Yang Z., Ma C. (2015). "Touching tastes: the haptic perception transfer of liquid food packaging materials", Food Qual. Pref. Vol 39, 124130. [Crossref]
38. Walker P. (2012). "Cross-sensory correspondences and cross talk between dimensions of connotative meaning: visual angularity is hard, high-pitched, and bright", Atten. Percept. Psychophys. Vol 74, 17921809. [Crossref]
39. Walker P., Smith S. (1985). "Stroop interference based on the multimodal correlates of haptic size and auditory pitch", Perception Vol 14, 729736. [Crossref]
40. Walker P., Walker L. (2012). "Size–brightness correspondence: crosstalk and congruity among dimensions of connotative meaning", Atten. Percept. Psychophys. Vol 74, 12261240. [Crossref]
41. Walker L., Walker P. (2016). "Cross-sensory mapping of feature values in the size–brightness correspondence can be more relative than absolute", J. Exp. Psychol. Hum. Percept. Perform. Vol 42, 138150. [Crossref]
42. Walker P., Francis B. J., Walker L. (2010). "The brightness–weight illusion", Exp. Psychol. Vol 57, 462469. [Crossref]
43. Walker L., Walker P., Francis B. (2012). "A common scheme for cross-sensory correspondences across stimulus domains", Perception Vol 41, 11861192. [Crossref]
44. Walker P., Walker L., Francis B. (2015). "The size–brightness correspondence: evidence for crosstalk among aligned conceptual feature dimensions", Atten. Percept. Psychophys. Vol 77, 26942710. [Crossref]
45. Walsh V. (2003). "A theory of magnitude: common cortical metrics of time, space and quantity", Trends Cogn. Sci. Vol 7, 483488. [Crossref]
46. Ward J., Banissy M. J., Jonas C. (2008). "Haptic perception in synaesthesia", in: Human Haptic Perception: Basics and Applications, Grunwald M. (Ed.), pp.  259265. Birkhäuser, Basel, Switzerland. [Crossref]
http://brill.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journals/10.1163/22134808-00002534
Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1163/22134808-00002534
2016-10-31
2018-01-23

Sign-in

Can't access your account?
  • Tools

  • Add to Favorites
  • Printable version
  • Email this page
  • Subscribe to ToC alert
  • Get permissions
  • Recommend to your library

    You must fill out fields marked with: *

    Librarian details
    Your details
    Why are you recommending this title?
    Select reason:
     
    Multisensory Research — Recommend this title to your library
  • Export citations
  • Key

  • Full access
  • Open Access
  • Partial/No accessInformation