Cookies Policy

This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies.

I accept this policy

Find out more here

Object Domains and the Experience of Beauty

No metrics data to plot.
The attempt to load metrics for this article has failed.
The attempt to plot a graph for these metrics has failed.
The full text of this article is not currently available.

Brill’s MyBook program is exclusively available on BrillOnline Books and Journals. Students and scholars affiliated with an institution that has purchased a Brill E-Book on the BrillOnline platform automatically have access to the MyBook option for the title(s) acquired by the Library. Brill MyBook is a print-on-demand paperback copy which is sold at a favorably uniform low price.

Access this article

+ Tax (if applicable)
Add to Favorites
You must be logged in to use this functionality

image of Art & Perception

The purpose of the present study was to specify whether the structure of the experience of beauty is domain-specific or domain-general. Five basic descriptors of the experience of beauty were specified: two central descriptors, Beauty and Attractiveness, and three descriptors that represented different 16 aspects of Beauty: Pleasure (hedonic aspect), Harmony (perceptual aspect), and Interestingness (motivational aspect). Four groups of 25 participants rated different sets of visual stimuli on the five bipolar seven-step scales: Beautiful–Ugly, Attractive–Repulsive, Pleasant–Unpleasant, Harmonious–Disharmonious and Interesting–Boring. In preliminary studies four sets of stimuli were extracted: (1) environmental scenes, (2) human faces and bodies, (3) abstract forms and (4) artworks. Correlations between descriptors, and multiple regression analyses revealed that, in all of the categories of objects, attractiveness was consistently closer to pleasure than harmony and interestingness. The relationships between the other descriptors were category-specific: beauty was closer to pleasure in cases of environmental objects and artworks and it was closer to harmony in the case of human faces and bodies and abstract forms. These results suggest that the structure of the experience of beauty is partially general to all categories of objects and partially domain-specific.

Affiliations: 1: Laboratory of Experimental Psychology and Department of Psychology, Faculty of Philosophy, University of Belgrade, Čika Ljubina 18–20, 11000 Belgrade, Serbia

  • Supplementary Material
    • Publication Date : 17 February 2014
    • DOI : 10.1163/22134913-00002020_001
    • File Size: 100038
    • File format:application/pdf

Full text loading...


Data & Media loading...

1. Aharon I. , Etcoff N. , Ariely D. , Chabris C. F. , O’Connor E. , Breiter H. C. ( 2001). "Beautiful faces have variable reward value: fMRI and behavioral evidence", Neuron Vol 32, 537551. [Crossref]
2. Apter M. J. ( 2001). Motivational Styles in Everyday Life: A Guide to Reversal Theory. American Psychological Association, Washington, D.C., USA. [Crossref]
3. Armstrong T. , Detweiler-Bedell B. ( 2008). "Beauty as an emotion: The exhilarating prospect of mastering a challenging world", Rev. Gen. Psychol. Vol 12, 305329. [Crossref]
4. Arnheim R. ( 1949). "The Gestalt theory of expression", Psychol. Rev. Vol 56, 156171. [Crossref]
5. Arnheim R. ( 1969). Art and Visual Perception. University of California Press, Berkeley and Los Angeles, CA, USA.
6. Arnheim R. ( 1980). Visual Thinking. University of California Press, Berkeley and Los Angeles, CA, USA.
7. Attneave F. ( 1955). "Symmetry, information, and memory for patterns", Am. J. Psychol. Vol 68, 209222. [Crossref]
8. Augustin M. D. , Leder H. , Hutzler F. , Carbon C. C. ( 2008). "Style follows content: On the microgenesis of art perception", Acta Psychol. Vol 128, 127138. [Crossref]
9. Augustin M. D. , Carbon C. C. , Wagemans J. ( 2012a). "Artful terms: A study on aesthetic word usage for visual art versus film and music", Iperception Vol 3, 319337.
10. Augustin M. D. , Wagemans J. , Carbon C.-C. ( 2012b). "All is beautiful? Generality vs. specificity of word usage in visual aesthetics", Acta Psychol. Vol 139, 187201. [Crossref]
11. Bar M. , Neta M. ( 2006). "Humans prefer curved visual objects", Psychol. Sci. Vol 17, 645648. [Crossref]
12. Berlyne D. E. ( 1971). Aesthetics and Psychobiology. Appleton Century-Crofts, New York, NY, USA.
13. Berlyne D. E. ( 1974a). "Novelty, complexity, and interestingness", in: Studies in the New Experimental Aesthetics, Berlyne D. E. (Ed.), pp.  175180. Hemisphere Publishing Corporation, Washington, D.C., USA.
14. Berlyne D. E. ( 1974b). "Hedonic tone and reward value of exposure to paintings", in: Studies in the New Experimental Aesthetics, Berlyne D. E. (Ed.), pp.  227234. Hemisphere Publishing Corporation, Washington, D.C., USA.
15. Berlyne D. E. , Ogilvie J. C. ( 1974). "Dimensions of perception of paintings", in: Studies in the New Experimental Aesthetics, Berlyne D. E. (Ed.), pp.  181226. Hemisphere Publishing Corporation, Washington, D.C., USA.
16. Berlyne D. E. , Robbins M. C. , Thompson R. ( 1974). "A cross-cultural study of exploratory and verbal responses to visual patterns varying in complexity", in: Studies in the New Experimental Aesthetics, Berlyne D. E. (Ed.), pp.  259278. Hemisphere Publishing Corporation, Washington, D.C., USA.
17. Birkhoff G. D. ( 1932). Aesthetic Measure. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA, USA.
18. Buffart H. , Leeuwenberg E. , Restle F. ( 1981). "Coding theory of visual pattern completion", J. Exp. Psychol. Hum. Percept. Perform. Vol 7, 241274. [Crossref]
19. Carbon C. C. ( 2010). "The cycle of preference: Long-term dynamics of aesthetic appreciation", Acta Psychol. Vol 134, 233244. [Crossref]
20. Carbon C. C. ( 2011). "Cognitive mechanisms for explaining dynamics of aesthetic appreciation", Iperception Vol 2, 708719.
21. Creusen M. E. H. , Schoormans J. P. L. ( 2005). "The different roles of product appearance in consumer choice", J. Prod. Innov. Manag. Vol 22, 6381. [Crossref]
22. Eco U. ( 2007). On Ugliness. Harvill Secker, London, Great Britain. (Original work published 2002).
23. Eco U. ( 2004). History of Beauty. Seeker and Warburg, London, Great Britain. (Original work published 2002).
24. Ertel S. ( 1973). "Exploratory choice and verbal judgement", in: Pleasure, Reward, Preference, Berlyne D. E. , Madsen K. B. (Eds), pp.  115132. Academic Press, New York, NY, USA. [Crossref]
25. Evans D. R. , Day H. I. ( 1971). "The factorial structure of responses to perceptual complexity", Psychon. Sci. Vol 22, 357359. [Crossref]
26. Eysenck H. J. ( 1941). "The empirical determination of an aesthetic formula", Psychol. Rev. Vol 48, 8392. [Crossref]
27. Faerber S. J. , Carbon C. C. ( 2012). "The power of liking: Highly sensitive aesthetic processing for guiding us through the world", Iperception Vol 3, 553561.
28. Faerber S. J. , Leder H. , Gerger G. , Carbon C. C. ( 2010). "Priming semantic concepts affects the dynamics of aesthetic appreciation", Acta Psychol. Vol 135, 191200. [Crossref]
29. Furnham A. , Tan T. , McManus C. ( 1997). "Waist-to-hip ratio and preference for body shape: A replication and extension", Pers. Indiv. Dif. Vol 22, 539549. [Crossref]
30. Garner W. R. , Sutliff D. ( 1974). "The effect of goodness on encoding time in visual pattern", Percept. Psychophys. Vol 16, 426430. [Crossref]
31. Geldart S. ( 2010). "That woman looks pretty, but is she attractive? Female perceptions of facial beauty and the impact of cultural labels", Eur. Rev. Appl. Psychol. Vol 60, 7987. [Crossref]
32. Green D. C. ( 1995). "All that glitters: A review of psychological research on the aesthetics of the golden section", Perception Vol 24, 937968. [Crossref]
33. Henss R. ( 1995). "Waist-to-hip ratio and attractiveness: Replication and extension", Pers. Indiv. Diff. Vol 19, 479488. [Crossref]
34. Hogarth W. ( 1753). The Analysis of Beauty. J. Reeves, London.
35. Ishai A. ( 2007). "Sex, beauty and the orbitofrontal cortex", Int. J. Psychophysiol. Vol 63, 181185. [Crossref]
36. Jacobsen T. , Buchta K. , Köhler M. , Schröger E. ( 2004). "The primacy of beauty in judging the aesthetics of objects", Psychol. Rep. Vol 94, 12531260.
37. Janković D. , Marković S. ( 2001). "Takete–Maluma phenomenon", Perception( Suppl.) Vol 30, 29.
38. Kaplan S. ( 1992). "Environmental preference in a knowledge seeking knowledge using organism", in: The Adaptive Mind, Barkow J. H. , Cosmides L. , Tooby J. (Eds), pp.  535552. Oxford University Press, New York, NY, USA.
39. Koffka K. ( 1935). Principles of Gestalt Psychology. Kegan, Paul, Trench & Trubner, London, UK.
40. Kubovy M. ( 1999). "On the pleasures of the mind", in: Well-Being: The Foundations of Hedonic Psychology, Kahneman D. , Diener E. , Schwarz N. (Eds), pp.  134154. Russell Sage, New York, NY, USA.
41. Leder H. , Belke B. , Oeberst A. , Augustin D. ( 2004). "A model of aesthetic appreciation and aesthetic judgments", Br. J. Psychol. Vol 95, 489508. [Crossref]
42. Libby W. L. , Lacey B. C. , Lacey J. I. ( 1973). "Pupilary and cardiatic activity during visual attention", Psychophysiology Vol 10, 270294. [Crossref]
43. Liu Y. ( 2003). "Engineering aesthetics and aesthetic ergonomics: Theoretical foundations and a dual-process research methodology", Ergonomics Vol 46, 12731292. [Crossref]
44. Luedtke R. , Hesslinger V. M. , Carbon C. C. ( 2012). "Different facets of facial attractiveness: Specification of the relationship between attractiveness, beauty, prettiness and sexual attraction", Perception Vol 41 (S), 116.
45. Marković S. ( 2010). "Aesthetic experience and the emotional content of paintings", Psihologija Vol 43, 4360. [Crossref]
46. Marković S. ( 2012). "Components of aesthetic experience: aesthetic fascination, aesthetic appraisal, and aesthetic emotion", i-Perception Vol 3, 117. [Crossref]
47. Marković S. , Gvozdenović V. ( 2001). "Symmetry, complexity and perceptual economy: Effects of minimum and maximum simplicity conditions", Vis. Cogn. Vol 8, 305327. [Crossref]
48. Marković S. , Janković D. ( 2001). "Implicit and explicit features of visual Gestalten", Perception( Suppl.) Vol 30, 30.
49. Marković S. , Radonjić A. ( 2008). "Implicit and explicit features of paintings", Spatial Vis. (Special Issue — Art and Perception: Towards a Visual Science of Art, Part 3), Vol 21, 229259. [Crossref]
50. Martindale C. , Moore K. ( 1988). "Priming prototypicality and preference", J. Exp. Psychol. Hum. Percept. Perform. Vol 14, 661670. [Crossref]
51. McManus I. C. ( 1980). "The aesthetics of simple figures", Br. J. Psychol. Vol 71, 505524. [Crossref]
52. McManus I. C. , Cheema B. , Stoker J. ( 1993). "The aesthetics of composition: A study of Mondrian", Empir. Stud. Arts Vol 11, 8394. [Crossref]
53. Mealey L. , Bridgstock R. , Townsend G. C. ( 1999). "Symmetry and perceived facial attractivness: A monozygotic co-twin comparison", J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. Vol 76, 157165. [Crossref]
54. Mealey L. , Theis P. ( 1995). "The relationship of mood and preferences among natural landscapes: an evolutionary perspective", Ethol. Sociobiol. Vol 16, 247256. [Crossref]
55. O’Doherty J. , Critchley H. , Deichmann R. , Dolan R. J. ( 2003). "Dissociating valence of outcome from behavioral control in human orbital and ventral prefrontal cortices", J. Neurosci. Vol 23, 79317939.
56. Orians G. H. ( 1980). "Habitat selection: General theory and applications to human behavior", in: The Evolution of Human Social Behavior, Lockard S. J. (Ed.), pp.  4966. Elsevier, Chicago, IL, USA.
57. Orians G. H. , Heerwagen J. H. ( 1992). "Evolved responses to landscapes", in: The Adapted Mind: Evolutionary Psychology and the Generation of Culture, Barkow J. H. , Cosmides L. , Tooby J. (Eds), pp.  555580. Oxford University Press, New York, NY, USA.
58. Osgood C. , May W. , Miron M. ( 1975). Cross-cultural Universals of Affective Meaning. University of Illinois Press, Urbana, IL, USA.
59. Osgood C. , Succi G. J. , Tannenbaum P. ( 1957). The Measurement of Meaning. University of Illinois Press, Urbana, IL, USA.
60. Paradiso S. , Johnson D. L. , Andreasen N. C. , O’Leary D. S. , Watkins G. L. , Boles Ponto L. L. , Hichwa R. D. ( 1999). "Cerebral blood flow changes associated with attribution of emotional valence to pleasant, unpleasant, and neutral visual stimuli in a PET study of normal subjects", Am. J. Psych. Vol 156, 16181629. [Crossref]
61. Perrett D. I. , Lee K. J. , Penton-Voak I. S. , Rowland D. A. , Yoshikawa S. , Burt D. M. , Henzi S. P. , Castles D. L. , Akamatsu S. ( 1998). "Effect of sexual dimorphism of facial attractiveness", Nature Vol 394, 884887. [Crossref]
62. Ramachandran V. C. , Hirstein W. ( 1999). "The science of art: A neurological theory of aesthetic experience", J. Conscious. Stud. Vol 6, 1551.
63. Rhodes G. , Proffitt F. , Grady J. , Sumich A. ( 1998). "Facial symmetry and the perception of beauty", Psychon. Bull. Rev. Vol 5, 659669. [Crossref]
64. Russell J. A. ( 1980). "A circumplex model of affect", J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. Vol 39, 11611178. [Crossref]
65. Russell J. A. ( 2003). "Core affect and the psychological construction of emotion", Psychol. Rev. Vol 110, 145172. [Crossref]
66. Sepänmaa Y. ( 1993). The Beauty of Environment: A General Model for Environmental Aesthetics. Environmental Ethics Books, Denton, TX, USA.
67. Silvia P. J. ( 2005). "Emotional response to art: From collation and arousal to cognition and emotion", J. Gen. Psychol. Vol 9, 342357.
68. Silvia P. J. ( 2009). "Looking past pleasure: Anger, confusion, disgust, pride, surprise, and other unusual aesthetic emotions", Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts Vol 3, 4851. [Crossref]
69. Silvia P. J. , Brown E. M. ( 2007). "Anger, disgust, and the negative aesthetic emotions: Expanding an appraisal model of aesthetic experience", Psychology of Aesthetic, Creativity, and the Arts Vol 1, 100106. [Crossref]
70. Singh D. ( 1993). "Adaptive significance of waist-to-hip ratio and female physical attractiveness", J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. Vol 65, 293307. [Crossref]
71. Symons D. ( 1979). The Evolution of Human Sexuality. Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK.
72. Thornhill R. ( 2003). "Darwinian aesthetic informs traditional aesthetics", in: Evolutionary Aesthetics, Voland E. , Grammer K. (Eds), pp.  1035. Springer, Berlin, Germany.
73. Thornhill R. , Gangestat S. W. ( 1999). "Facial attractiveness", Tr. Cogn. Sci. Vol 3, 452460. [Crossref]
74. Tinbergen N. ( 1954). Curious Naturalists. Basic Books, New York, NY, USA.
75. Wagemans J. ( 1995). "Detection of visual symmetries", Spat. Vis. Vol 9, 932. [Crossref]
76. Winkielman P. , Cacioppo J. T. ( 2001). "Mind at ease put a smile on the face: Psychophysiological evidence that processing facilitation elicits positive effect", J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. Vol 81, 9891000. [Crossref]

Article metrics loading...



Can't access your account?
  • Tools

  • Add to Favorites
  • Printable version
  • Email this page
  • Subscribe to ToC alert
  • Get permissions
  • Recommend to your library

    You must fill out fields marked with: *

    Librarian details
    Your details
    Why are you recommending this title?
    Select reason:
    Art & Perception — Recommend this title to your library
  • Export citations
  • Key

  • Full access
  • Open Access
  • Partial/No accessInformation