Cookies Policy

This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies.

I accept this policy

Find out more here

Representation and Aesthetics of the Human Face in Portraiture

No metrics data to plot.
The attempt to load metrics for this article has failed.
The attempt to plot a graph for these metrics has failed.
The full text of this article is not currently available.

Brill’s MyBook program is exclusively available on BrillOnline Books and Journals. Students and scholars affiliated with an institution that has purchased a Brill E-Book on the BrillOnline platform automatically have access to the MyBook option for the title(s) acquired by the Library. Brill MyBook is a print-on-demand paperback copy which is sold at a favorably uniform low price.

Access this article

+ Tax (if applicable)
Add to Favorites
You must be logged in to use this functionality

image of Art & Perception

How do representations of the face in portraits relate to the natural face, and how does the aesthetics of portraits relate to the aesthetics of faces in photographs? Here we investigate these questions with regard to the frontal face. Frontal faces are of particular interest because they are by far the most commonly studied type of face image in psychology, yet frontal portraits have been little studied by psychologists. Using behavioral and statistical tests, we show that artistic representations of frontal female faces have representational properties that broadly match those of the natural face, but we also find properties unique to artworks. We report that, as with frontal faces, frontal portraits show norm-based coding properties with respect to preference: averaged portraits become more attractive in proportion to the number of portraits averaged together. However, averaged photographs of faces are preferred to averaged portraits, suggesting that faces in portraits and photographed faces show basic differences in aesthetics. Consistent with this notion, we found that average face width and height ratios in an extended sample of frontal female portraits were significantly different from those for photographed faces. This indicates that portraits on average are not faithful representations of the typical structure of the face. In a behavioral experiment where we manipulated the structural ratios in portraits, we found that the preferred width and height ratios were significantly different from those preferred in photographed faces, and that the preferred ratios for portraits were closer to the average ratios of the portrait sample. We evaluate a variety of possible causes of the observed differences. We conclude that despite the demonstrated differences between artistic representations and natural faces, fundamental properties of natural faces are preserved in artistic representations of the face.

Affiliations: 1: 1Department of Psychology, Hobart and William Smith Colleges, Geneva, NY, USA; 2: 2Computational Biology and Cognitive Science Lab, Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering, Ohio State University, Columbus, OH, USA; 3: 3Department of Psychological and Brain Sciences, Dartmouth College, Hanover, NH, USA; 4: 4Department of Psychological Basic Research, Faculty of Psychology, University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria

  • Supplementary Material
    • Publication Date : 17 February 2014
    • DOI : 10.1163/22134913-00002026_001
    • File Size: 124473
    • File format:application/pdf

Full text loading...


Data & Media loading...

1. Alvarez G. , Ceballos F. C. , Quinteiro C. ( 2009). "The role of inbreeding in the extinction of a European royal dynasty", PLoS ONE Vol 4, e5174.
2. Anstis S. ( 2002). "Was El Greco astigmatic?" Leonardo Vol 35, 208.
3. Balas B. J. , Sinha P. ( 2007). "Portraits and perception: configural information in creating and recognizing face images", Spat. Vis. Vol 21, 119135.
4. Belke B. , Leder H. , Strobach T. , Carbon C. C. ( 2010). "Cognitive fluency: high-level processing dynamics in art appreciation", Psychol. Aesthet. Creat. Arts Vol 4, 214222.
5. Bruce V. , Young A. W. ( 1998). In the Eye of the Beholder: The Science of Face Perception. Oxford University Press, New York, NY, USA.
6. Bryan R. , Perona P. , Adolphs R. ( 2012). "Perspective distortion from interpersonal distance is an implicit visual cue for social judgments of faces", PLoS ONE Vol 7, e45301.
7. Carbon C. C. , Leder H. ( 2006). "When faces are heads: view-dependent recognition of faces altered relationally or componentially", Swiss J. Psychol. Vol 65, 245252.
8. Catz O. , Kampf M. , Nachson I. , Babkoff H. ( 2009). "From theory to implementation: building a multidimensional space for face recognition", Acta Psychol. Vol 131, 143152.
9. Cavanagh P. ( 2005). "The artist as neuroscientist", Nature Vol 434, 301307.
10. Chatterjee A. ( 2011). "Neuroaesthetics: a coming of age story", J. Cogn. Neurosci. Vol 23, 5362.
11. Cohen D. J. , Bennett S. ( 1997). "Why can’t most people draw what they see?" J. Exp. Psychol. Hum. Percept. Perform. Vol 23, 609621.
12. Costa M. , Corazza L. ( 2006). "Aesthetic phenomena as supernormal stimuli: the case of eye, lip, and lower-face size and roundness in artistic portraits", Perception Vol 35, 229246.
13. Cunningham M. R. ( 1991). "Average faces are attractive, but very attractive faces are not average", Psychol. Sci. Vol 2, 123125.
14. Cutting J. E. ( 2003). "Gustave Caillebotte, French impressionism, and mere exposure", Psychonom. Bull. Rev. Vol 10, 319343.
15. Dakin S. C. , Watt R. J. ( 2009). "Biological “bar codes” in human faces", J. Vis. Vol 9( 4), 2.
16. Di Dio C. , Macaluso E. , Rizzolatti G. ( 2007). "The golden beauty: brain response to classical and renaissance sculptures", PLoS ONE Vol 2, e1201.
17. Farkas L. G. ( 1994). Anthropometry of the Head and Face. Raven Press, New York, NY, USA.
18. Farkas L. G. , Kolar J. C. ( 1987). "Anthropometrics and art in the aesthetics of women’s faces", Clin. Plastic Surg. Vol 14, 599616.
19. Firestone C. ( 2013). "On the origin and status of the “El Greco fallacy”", Perception Vol 42, 672674.
20. Goffaux V. , Rossion B. ( 2006). "Faces are “spatial”-Holistic face perception is supported by low spatial frequencies", J. Exp. Psychol. Hum. Percept. Perform. Vol 32, 10231038.
21. Gombrich E. ( 1977). Art and Illusion. Phaidon Press, London, UK.
22. Graham D. J. ( 2011). "Visual perception: lightness in a high dynamic range world", Curr. Biol. Vol 21, R914R916.
23. Graham D. J. , Field D. J. ( 2007). "Statistical regularities of art images and natural scenes: spectra, sparseness and nonlinearities", Spat. Vis. Vol 21, 149164.
24. Graham D. J. , Field D. J. ( 2008). "Variations in intensity statistics for representational and abstract art, and for art from the eastern and western hemispheres", Perception Vol 37, 13411352.
25. Graham D. J. , Friedenberg J. D. , Rockmore D. N. ( 2009). "Efficient visual system processing of spatial and luminance statistics in representational and non-representational art", Proc. SPIE: Human Vision and Electronic Imaging Vol 7240, 72401N.
26. Graham D. J. , Friedenberg J. D. , Rockmore D. N. , Field D. J. ( 2010). "Mapping the similarity space of paintings: image statistics and visual perception", Vis. Cogn. Vol 18, 559573.
27. Graham D. J. , Hughes J. M. , Leder H. , Rockmore D. N. ( 2011). "Statistics, vision, and the analysis of artistic style", WIREs Comput. Stat. Vol 4, 115123.
28. Graham D. J. , Meng M. ( 2011a). "Artistic representations: clues to efficient coding in human vision", Vis. Neurosci. Vol 28, 371379.
29. Graham D. J. , Meng M. ( 2011b). "Altered spatial frequency content in paintings by artists with schizophrenia", i-Perception Vol 2, 19.
30. Graham D. J. , Schwarz B. , Leder H. ( 2013). "Preference for higher-order luminance regularities in natural scenes", J. Vis. Vol 13, 1236.
31. Grammer K. , Thornhill R. ( 1994). "Human ( Homo sapiens) facial attractiveness and sexual selection: the role of symmetry and averageness", J. Compar. Psychol. Vol 108, 233242.
32. Green C. D. ( 1995). "All that glitters: a review of psychological research on the aesthetics of the golden section", Perception Vol 24, 937968.
33. Halberstadt J. , Rhodes G. ( 2000). "The attractiveness of nonface averages: implications for an evolutionary explanation of the attractiveness of average faces", Psychol. Sci. Vol 11, 285289.
34. Halberstadt J. , Rhodes G. ( 2003). "It’s not just average faces that are attractive: computer-manipulated averageness makes birds, fish, and automobiles attractive", Psychonom, Bull. Rev. Vol 10, 149156.
35. Hayes S. , Milne N. ( 2011). "What’s wrong with this picture? An experiment in quantifying accuracy in 2D portrait drawing", Vis. Commun. Vol 10, 149174.
36. Hayn-Leichsenring G. U. , Kloth N. , Schweinberger S. R. , Redies C. ( 2013). "Adaptation effects to attractiveness of face photographs and art portraits are domain-specific", i-Perception Vol 4, 303316.
37. Helmholtz H. ( 1876/1995). "On the relation of optics to painting", in: Science and Culture: Popular and Philosophical Essays, Cahan D. (Ed.), pp.  279308. University of Chicago Press, Chicago, IL, USA.
38. Hughes J. M. , Graham D. J. , Jacobsen C. R. , Rockmore D. N. ( 2011). Comparing higher-order spatial statistics and perceptual judgments in the stylometric analysis of art, in: Proc. EUSIPCO 2011, Barcelona, Spain.
39. Jacobsen T. , Höfel L. E. A. ( 2002). "Aesthetic judgments of novel graphic patterns: analyses of individual judgments", Percept. Motor Skills Vol 95, 755766.
40. Jones B. C. , Little A. C. , Penton-Voak I. S. , Tiddeman B. P. , Burt D. M. , Perrett D. I. ( 2001). "Facial symmetry and judgements of apparent health: support for a “good genes” explanation of the attractiveness–symmetry relationship", Evol. Hum. Behav. Vol 22, 417429.
41. Kietzmann T. C. , Wahn B. , König P. , Tong F. ( 2013). Face selective areas in the human ventral stream exhibit a preference for 3/4 views in the fovea and periphery, Perception42, 36th ECVP, Bremen, Germany, Abstract Suppl., p. 54.
42. Kozbelt A. , Seidel A. , ElBassiouny A. , Mark Y. , Owen D. R. ( 2010). "Visual selection contributes to artists’ advantages in realistic drawing", Psychol. Aesthet. Creat. Arts Vol 4, 93102.
43. Laeng B. , Rouw R. ( 2001). "Canonical views of faces and the cerebral hemispheres", Laterality Vol 6, 193224.
44. Langlois J. H. , Roggman L. A. ( 1990). "Attractive faces are only average", Psychol. Sci. Vol 1, 115121.
45. Leder H. ( 1996). "Line drawings of faces reduce configural processing", Perception Vol 25, 355366.
46. Leder H. , Belke B. , Oeberst A. , Augustin D. ( 2004). "A model of aesthetic appreciation and aesthetic judgments", Br. J. Psychol. Vol 95, 489508.
47. Leder H. , Bruce V. ( 2000). "When inverted faces are recognized: the role of configural information in face recognition", Q. J. Exp. Psychol. A Vol 53, 513536.
48. Leder H. , Candrian G. , Huber O. , Bruce V. ( 2001). "Configural features in the context of upright and inverted faces", Perception Vol 30, 7384.
49. Leder H. , Ring A. , Dressler S. ( 2013). "See me, feel me! Aesthetic evaluations of art portraits", Psychol. Aesthet. Creat. Arts Vol 74, 358369.
50. Leopold D. A. , O’Toole A. J. , Vetter T. , Blanz V. ( 2001). "Prototype-referenced shape encoding revealed by high-level aftereffects", Nature Neurosci. Vol 4, 8994.
51. Liu C. H. , Chaudhuri A. ( 2002). "Reassessing the 3/4 view effect in face recognition", Cognition Vol 83, 3148.
52. Maurer D. , Grand R. L. , Mondloch C. J. ( 2002). "The many faces of configural processing", Tr. Cogn. Sci. Vol 6, 255260.
53. McManus I. C. , Buckman J. , Woolley E. ( 2004). "Is light in pictures presumed to come from the left side", Perception Vol 33, 14211436.
54. McManus I. C. , Humphrey N. K. ( 1973). "Turning the left cheek", Nature Vol 243, 271272.
55. McManus I. C. , Thomas P. ( 2007). "Eye centering in portraits: a theoretical and empirical evaluation", Perception Vol 36, 167182.
56. Pallett P. M. , Link S. , Lee K. ( 2010). "New “golden” ratios for facial beauty", Vis. Res. Vol 50, 149154.
57. Palmer S. E. , Gardner J. S. , Wickens T. D. ( 2007). "Aesthetic issues in spatial composition: effects of position and direction on framing single objects", Spat. Vis. Vol 21, 421449.
58. Perona P. ( 2013). "Far and yet close: multiple viewpoints for the perfect portrait", Art Percept. Vol 1, 105120.
59. Perrett D. I. , Burt D. M. , Penton-Voak I. S. , Lee K. J. , Rowland D. A. , Edwards R. ( 1999). "Symmetry and human facial attractiveness", Evol. Hum. Behav. Vol 20, 295307.
60. Perrett D. I. , May K. A. , Yoshikawa S. ( 1994). "Facial shape and judgements of female attractiveness", Nature Vol 368, 239242.
61. Powell W. R. , Schirillo J. A. ( 2009). "Asymmetrical facial expressions in portraits and hemispheric laterality: a literature review", Laterality Vol 14, 545572.
62. Principe C. P. , Langlois J. H. ( 2011). "Faces differing in attractiveness elicit corresponding affective responses", Cogn. Emot. Vol 25, 140148.
63. Redies C. , Hasenstein J. , Denzler J. ( 2007a). "Fractal-like image statistics in visual art: similarity to natural scenes", Spat. Vis. Vol 21, 137148.
64. Redies C. , Hänisch J. , Blickhan M. , Denzler J. ( 2007b). "Artists portray human faces with the Fourier statistics of complex natural scenes", Network: Comput. Neural Syst. Vol 18, 235248.
65. Rhodes G. ( 2006). "The evolutionary psychology of facial beauty", Annu. Rev. Psychol. Vol 57, 199226.
66. Rhodes G. , Jeffery L. , Watson T. L. , Clifford C. W. , Nakayama K. ( 2003). "Fitting the mind to the World Face Adaptation and Attractiveness Aftereffects", Psychol. Sci. Vol 14, 558566.
67. Rhodes G. , Sumich A. , Byatt G. ( 1999). "Are average facial configurations attractive only because of their symmetry?" Psychol. Sci. Vol 10, 5258.
68. Schirillo J. A. ( 2000). "Hemispheric asymmetries and gender influence Rembrandt’s portrait orientations", Neuropsychologia Vol 38, 15931606.
69. Schirillo J. A. ( 2007). "Gender’s effect on the hemispheric laterality of Rembrandt’s portraits", Spat. Vis. Vol 21, 1926.
70. Schwaninger A. , Ryf S. , Hofer F. ( 2003). "Configural information is processed differently in perception and recognition of faces", Vis. Res. Vol 43, 15011505.
71. Schweinhart A. , Essock E. (in press). "Structural content in paintings: artists over-regularize content of paintings to match typical natural scene biases", Perception.
72. ten Cate C. ( 2002). "Posing as professor: laterality in posing orientation for portraits of scientists", J. Nonverbal Behav. Vol 26, 175192.
73. Tinio P. P. T. , Leder H. ( 2009). "Just how stable are aesthetic features? Symmetry, Complexity and the jaws of massive familiarization", Acta Psychol. Vol 130, 241250.
74. Tyler C. W. ( 1998). "Painters centre one eye in portraits", Nature Vol 392, 877878.
75. Valentine T. ( 1991). "A unified account of the effects of distinctiveness, inversion, and race in face recognition", Q. J. Exp. Psychol. Vol 43, 161204.
76. Vegter F. , Hage J. J. ( 2000). "Clinical anthropometry and canons of the face in historical perspective", Plast. Reconstr. Surg. Vol 106, 10901096.

Article metrics loading...



Can't access your account?
  • Tools

  • Add to Favorites
  • Printable version
  • Email this page
  • Subscribe to ToC alert
  • Get permissions
  • Recommend to your library

    You must fill out fields marked with: *

    Librarian details
    Your details
    Why are you recommending this title?
    Select reason:
    Art & Perception — Recommend this title to your library
  • Export citations
  • Key

  • Full access
  • Open Access
  • Partial/No accessInformation