Cookies Policy
X

This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies.

I accept this policy

Find out more here

Arm Chair Perspective Preferences

No metrics data to plot.
The attempt to load metrics for this article has failed.
The attempt to plot a graph for these metrics has failed.
The full text of this article is not currently available.

Brill’s MyBook program is exclusively available on BrillOnline Books and Journals. Students and scholars affiliated with an institution that has purchased a Brill E-Book on the BrillOnline platform automatically have access to the MyBook option for the title(s) acquired by the Library. Brill MyBook is a print-on-demand paperback copy which is sold at a favorably uniform low price.

Access this article

+ Tax (if applicable)
Add to Favorites
You must be logged in to use this functionality

image of Art & Perception

Do generic observers in their free-style viewing of postcard-size pictures have a preference for specific modes of perspective rendering? This most likely depends upon the phrasing of the question. Here we consider the feeling of ‘presence’: does the observer experience a sense of being ‘immersed in the scene’? We had 40 Italian naïve participants and 19 British art students rate three types of rendering of ten ‘typical holiday pictures’. All pictures represented 130° over the width of the picture. They were rendered in linear perspective, Hauck maps, and Postel maps. The results are clearcut. About a quarter of the participants prefer linear perspective, whereas the Hauck map is preferred by more than half of the participants. Naïve observers and art students agree. Architectural scenes are somewhat more likely to be preferred in perspective. Preferences are not randomly distributed, but participants have remarkable idiosyncratic affinities, a small group for perspective projection, a larger group for the Hauck map. Such facts might find application in the viewing of photographs on handheld electronic display devices.

Affiliations: 1: 1 University of Leuven (KU Leuven), Laboratory of Experimental Psychology, Tiensestraat 102, Box 3711, 3000 Leuven, Belgium ; 2: 2Experimental Psychology, Utrecht University, Heidelberglaan 1, 3584 CS Utrecht, The Netherlands ; 3: 3Department of Humanities and Social Sciences, University of Sassari, Via Roma 151, 07100 Sassari, Italy ; 4: 4Cardiff School of Art and Design, Cardiff Metropolitan University, Cardiff CF24 0SP, UK

10.1163/22134913-00002044
/content/journals/10.1163/22134913-00002044
dcterms_title,pub_keyword,dcterms_description,pub_author
10
5
Loading
Loading data from figshare Loading data from figshare
Loading

Full text loading...

/content/journals/10.1163/22134913-00002044
Loading

Data & Media loading...

1. Alberti L. B. (1435). Della Pittura , Book I. (Numerous editions and translations available.)
2. Baldwin J. ,, Burleigh A. , and Pepperell R. (2014). "Comparing artistic and geometrical perspective depictions of space in the visual field". i-Perception Vol 5, 536547.
3. Bass M. ,, Van Stryland E. W ,, Williams D. R. , and Wolfe W. L. (1995). Handbook of Optics, Fundamentals, Techniques, & Design , Vol. 1, Part 8, Chapter 33, McGraw-Hill, New York, NY, USA.
4. Flocon A. , and Barre A. (1968). La Perspective Curviligne, de l’Espace Visuel à l’Image Construite , Flammarion, Paris, France.
5. Franke I. S. ,, Pannasch S. ,, Helmert J. R. ,, Rieger R. ,, Groh R. , and Velichkovsky B. M. (2008). "Towards attention-centered interfaces: An aesthetic evaluation of perspective with eye tracking". ACM Trans. Multimed. Comput. Commun. Appl. Vol 4, 113.
6. Gayford M. (2007). A Bigger Message: Conversation with David Hockney , Thames & Hudson, London, UK.
7. Gibson J. J. (1954). "A theory of pictorial perception". Av. Commun. Rev. Vol 2, 323.
8. Graham C. H. (1966). Vision and Visual Perception , Wiley, New York, NY, USA.
9. Hauck G. (1879). Die Subjektive Perspektive und die Horizontalen Curvaturen des Dorischen Styls. Eine Perspektivisch-Ästhetische Studie , Wittwer, Stuttgart, Germany.
10. Kepler J. (2000, orig. 1604). Optics, Paralipomena to Witelo & Optical Part of Astronomy (transl. W. H. Donahue), p. 186, Green Lion Press, Santa Fe, NM, USA.
11. Koenderink J. J. (2014). "Telescopic horizon scanning". Appl. Opt. Vol 53(36), 85568563. http://dx.doi.org/10.1364/AO.53.008556
12. Koenderink J. J. (in press). "“Towards a New Theory of Vision”" revisited. Topoi . DOI 10.1007/s11245-014-9288-x.
13. Koenderink J. J. ,, van Doorn A. J. , and Todd J. T. (2009). "Wide distribution of external local sign in the normal population". Psychol. Res. Vol 73, 1422. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00426-008-0145-7
14. Koenderink J. J. ,, van Doorn A. J. , and Wagemans J. (2011). "Depth". i-Perception Vol 2, 541564. http://dx.doi.org/10.1068/i0438aap
15. Koenderink J. J. ,, Wijntjes M. W. A. , and van Doorn A. J. (2013). "Zograscopic viewing". i-Perception Vol 4, 192206. http://dx.doi.org/10.1068/i0585
16. Koenderink J. J. ,, van Doorn A.J. ,, Pinna B. , and Pepperell R. (in press). "On Right and Wrong Drawings". Art Percept . DOI: 10.1163/22134913-00002043.
17. Listing J. B. (1845). Beitrag zur Physiologischen Optik, Göttinger Studien , Vandenhoeck and Ruprecht, Göttingen, Germany.
18. Malraux A. (1949). Le Musée Imaginaire , A. Skira, Paris, France.
19. Malraux A. (1951). Les Voix du Silence , Gallimard, Paris, France.
20. Mercator G. (1595). Atlas sive Cosmographicae Meditationes de Fabrica Mundi et Fabricati Figura , Duisburg, Germany.
21. Merlitz H. (2010). "Distortion of binoculars revisited: Does the sweet spot exist?" J. Opt. Soc. Am. A Vol 27(1), 5057. http://dx.doi.org/10.1364/JOSAA.27.000050
22. Oomes A. H. J. ,, Koenderink J. J. ,, van Doorn A. J. , and de Ridder H. (2009). "What are the uncurved lines in our visual field? A fresh look at Helmholtz’s checkerboard". Perception Vol 38, 12841294. http://dx.doi.org/10.1068/p6288
23. Panofsky E. (1925). "Die Perspektive als symbolische Form", in: Vorträge der Bibliothek Warburg, 1924/1925 , pp. 258330, GB Teubner, Leipzig, Germany.
24. Pepperell R. , (2012). "The perception of art and the science of perception", in: Human Vision and Electronic Imaging XVII , Rogowitz B. E. ,, Thrasyvoulos N. P. , and de Ridder H. (Eds), SPIE Press, Bellingham, WA, USA.
25. Pepperell R. , and Haertel M. (2014). "Do artists use linear perspective to depict visual space?" Perception Vol 43, 395416. http://dx.doi.org/10.1068/p7692
26. Pirenne M. H. (1970). Optics, Painting and Photography , Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK.
27. Pont S. C. ,, Nefs H. T. ,, van Doorn A. J. ,, Wijntjes M. W. A. ,, te Pas S. F. ,, de Ridder H. , and Koenderink J. J. (2011). "Depth in box spaces". Seeing Perceiving Vol 25, 339349.
28. Ptolemy (2nd c. AD) Planisphaerium. [Original Greek manuscript lost, but known from Arabic translation. Widely used throughout the middle ages.] See Sidoli and Berggren (2007).
29. Rockwell K. (2014). See .
30. Rogers B. J. (2008). "Helmholtz’s celestial sphere and the perception of straight lines". Perception Vol 37 Suppl., 125.
31. Rogers B. J. , and Brecher K. (2007). "Straight lines, ‘uncurved lines’, and Helmholtz’s ‘great circles on the celestial sphere’". Perception Vol 36, 12751289. http://dx.doi.org/10.1068/p5652
32. Snyder J. P. (1997). Flattening the Earth: Two Thousand Years of Map Projections . University of Chicago Press, Chicago, IL, USA.
33. Terasse M. (1988). Bonnard at Le Cannet . Thames & Hudson, London, UK.
34. Sidoli N. , and Berggren J. L. (2007). "The Arabic version of Ptolemy’s Planisphere or Flattening the Surface of the Sphere: Text, translation, commentary". SCIAMVS Vol 8, 37139.
35. Von Helmholtz H. (1866). Handbuch der Physiologischen Optik, 1st ed. ; 3rd, posthumous edition (1909–1911) by Voss, Hamburg.
36. Zeiss C. , and von Rohr M. (1904). Linsensystem zum Einaugigen Betrachten einer in der Brennebene Befindlichen Photographie , Kaiserliches Patentamt Patentschrift Nr. 151312 Klasse 42h. (1904).
37. Zeiss C. ,, Firma Carl Zeiss Jena (1907). Instrument zum Beidäugigen Betrachten u. dgl., das aus einer Geraden Zahl gegen die Mittellinie des Objektraums um 45° Geneigter Spiegel in oder außer Verbindung mit einem Fernrohrsystem Besteht , Kaiserliches Patentamt, Patentschrift Nr. 194480, Klasse 42h, Gruppe 34 (1907).
http://brill.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journals/10.1163/22134913-00002044
Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1163/22134913-00002044
2016-12-08
2017-11-19

Sign-in

Can't access your account?
  • Tools

  • Add to Favorites
  • Printable version
  • Email this page
  • Subscribe to ToC alert
  • Get permissions
  • Recommend to your library

    You must fill out fields marked with: *

    Librarian details
    Your details
    Why are you recommending this title?
    Select reason:
     
    Art & Perception — Recommend this title to your library
  • Export citations
  • Key

  • Full access
  • Open Access
  • Partial/No accessInformation