Cookies Policy
X

This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies.

I accept this policy

Find out more here

Facial Types in Painting and Recognition Skills: Laymen as Connoisseurs

No metrics data to plot.
The attempt to load metrics for this article has failed.
The attempt to plot a graph for these metrics has failed.
The full text of this article is not currently available.

Brill’s MyBook program is exclusively available on BrillOnline Books and Journals. Students and scholars affiliated with an institution that has purchased a Brill E-Book on the BrillOnline platform automatically have access to the MyBook option for the title(s) acquired by the Library. Brill MyBook is a print-on-demand paperback copy which is sold at a favorably uniform low price.

Access this article

+ Tax (if applicable)
Add to Favorites
You must be logged in to use this functionality

image of Art & Perception

The history of art attribution in painting demonstrates that connoisseurs compare faces and facial features in their efforts to ascribe paintings to regions, schools, workshops and specific artists. Connoisseurs do not generally reflect on their application of face recognition or its importance. Since connoisseurs apply both specialist perception skills (recognising a brushstroke technique, for instance) and generic perception skills, an experiment was performed aiming to eliminate a connoisseur’s specialist skills. The experiment was performed using laymen observing faces, derived from paintings, that were stripped from all contextual information (i.e., cut-out faces). Thus, only generic skills could be applied in order to categorise these pictures. The results show how laymen arrive at the same categorisation of paintings as connoisseurs do, without prior training in matters of artistic connoisseurship.

Affiliations: 1: Department of Art History, Faculty of Humanities, Utrecht University, The Netherlands

10.1163/22134913-00002063
/content/journals/10.1163/22134913-00002063
dcterms_title,pub_keyword,dcterms_description,pub_author
10
5
Loading
Loading

Full text loading...

/content/journals/10.1163/22134913-00002063
Loading

Data & Media loading...

1. Benoit C. (1901). "La peinture française à la fin du XVe siècle (1480–1501)", Gaz. B.-Arts 3, 318332.
2. Berenson B. (1962). Rudiments of Connoisseurship. Study and Criticism of Italian Art , Shocken Books, New York, NY, USA.
3. Bock F. (1900). Memling Studien , Schaub, Düsseldorf, Germany.
4. Boëll Ch. (1904). "Notre rapport dans le procès-verbal de la séance du 16 juin 1904 Mém". Soc. Éduenne 32, 438440.
5. Bouchot H. (1904). Les Primitifs Français. 1292–1500. Complément Documentaire au Catalogue Official de l’Exposition , 2nd ed., Librairie de l’Art Ancien et Moderne, Paris, France, unpaginated (sections Table des Planches, and Planches LXXX, LXXXI and XXXVI).
6. Châtelet A. (2001). Jean Prévost. Le Maître de Moulins , Gallimard, Paris, France.
7. De Vos D. (1971). "Madonna en kindtypologie bij Rogier van der Weyden en enkele minder gekende Flemalleske voorlopers", Jahrb. Berl. Mus. 13, 60161.
8. De Vos D. (1994), Hans Memling. Het volledige oeuvre , Mercatorfonds Paribas, Antwerpen, Belgium.
9. Diamond R., and Carey S. (1986). "Why faces are and are not special: An effect of expertise", J. Exp. Psychol. Gen. 115, 107117.
10. Duchaine B., and Nakayama K. (2006). "The Cambridge Face Memory Test: Results for neurologically intact individuals and an investigation of its validity using inverted face stimuli and prosopagnosic participants", Neuropsychologia 44, 576585.
11. Friedländer M.J. (1946). On Art and Connoisseurship , 4th ed., B. Cassirer, Oxford, UK.
12. Fry R. (1904). "The exhibition of French Primitives. Part II (Conclusion)". Burlingt. Mag. Connoisseurs 5, 356, 359, 361, 363, 365, 367.
13. Fry R. (1906). "The Maître de Moulins". Burlingt. Mag. Connoisseurs 9, 331.
14. Galton F. (1907). Inquiries into Human Faculty and its Development , 2nd ed., J. M. Dent & Co, London, UK / Dutton & Co, New York, NY, USA.
15. Gombrich E. H., (1986a). "Ideal and type in Italian renaissance painting", in: Gombrich on the Renaissance. Volume IV. New Light on Old Masters , Gombrich Ernst H., pp. 89125, Phaidon Press, London.
16. Gombrich E.H., (1986b). "The mask and the face. The perception of physiognomic likeness in life and in art", in: The Image and the Eye. Further Studies in the Psychology of Pictorial Representation , 2nd ed., Gombrich E. H., pp. 107108, Phaidon Press, Oxford, UK.
17. Hulin de Loo G. (1902a). De L’identité de Certains Maîtres Anonymes , A. Siffer, Ghent, Belgium.
18. Hulin de Loo G. (1902b) Bruges 1902. Exposition de Tableaux Flamands des XIVe, XVe et XVIe Siècles. Catalogue Critique , A. Siffer, Ghent, Belgium.
19. Lane B. (2009). Hans Memling. Master Painter in Fifteenth-century Bruges , Harvey Miller, London, UK / Turnhout, Belgium.
20. Mantz P. (1878). "Les portraits historique au Trocadéro", Gaz. B.-Arts 18, 857882.
21. Maurer D.,, Le Grand R., and Mondloch C. J. (2002), "The many faces of configural processing", Trends Cogn. Sci. 6, 255260.
22. Morelli G. (1900). Italian Painters. Critical Studies of their Works . Translated from the German by Constance Jocelyn Ffoulkes, J. Murray, London, UK.
23. Scott L. S., (2011). "Face perception and perceptual expertise in adult and developmental populations", in: The Oxford Handbook of Face Perception , Calder A. J.,, Rhodes G.,, Johnsons M. H., and Haxby J. V. (Eds), pp. 195213, Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK.
24. Sergent J. (1984), "An investigation into component and configural processes underlying face perception", Br. J. Psychol. 75, 221242.
25. Sterling Ch. (1968). "Jean Hey Le Maître de Moulins, Rev". Art 1–2, 2733.
26. Tanaka J. W., and Farah M. J. (1993). "Parts and wholes in face recognition", Q. J. Exp. Psychol. A 46, 225245.
27. Tanaka J. W., and Gordon I., (2011). "Features, configuration, and holistic face processing", in: The Oxford Handbook of Face Perception , Calder A. J.,, Rhodes G.,, Johnsons M. H., and Haxby J. V. (Eds), pp. 177194, Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK.
28. Tatler B. W.,, Wade N. J.,, Kwan H.,, Findlay J. M., and Velichkovsky B. M. (2010). "Yarbus, eye movements, and vision", i-Perception 1, 727.
29. Van de Wetering E. (2005). A Corpus of Rembrandt Paintings,Vol. IV , Springer, Dordrecht, The Netherlands.
30. Van de Wetering E. (2011). A Corpus of Rembrandt Paintings,Vol. V , Springer, Dordrecht, The Netherlands.
31. Van de Wetering E. (2014). A Corpus of Rembrandt Paintings,Vol. VI , Springer, Dordrecht, The Netherlands.
32. Wind E. (1963). Art and Anarchy , 3rd ed., Northwestern University Press, Evanston IL, USA.
33. Yarbus A. L. (1967). Eye movement and Vision , Plenum Press, New York, NY, USA.
34. Cambridge Face Memory Test , Birkbeck University of London. Accessed March 11, 2016. .
http://brill.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journals/10.1163/22134913-00002063
Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1163/22134913-00002063
2017-06-05
2018-11-14

Sign-in

Can't access your account?
  • Tools

  • Add to Favorites
  • Printable version
  • Email this page
  • Subscribe to ToC alert
  • Get permissions
  • Recommend to your library

    You must fill out fields marked with: *

    Librarian details
    Your details
    Why are you recommending this title?
    Select reason:
     
    Art & Perception — Recommend this title to your library
  • Export citations
  • Key

  • Full access
  • Open Access
  • Partial/No accessInformation