Data, Disciplines, and Dialogue: Lessons for Project Design
No metrics data to plot.
The attempt to load metrics for this article has failed.
The attempt to plot a graph for these metrics has failed.
The full text of this article is not currently available.
Brill’s MyBook program is exclusively available on
BrillOnline Books and Journals. Students and scholars affiliated with an
institution that has purchased a Brill E-Book on the BrillOnline platform
automatically have access to the MyBook option for the title(s) acquired by the
Library. Brill MyBook is a print-on-demand paperback copy which is sold at a
favorably uniform low price.
A common assumption in Digital Humanities (DH) project design is that ‘data’ is simply there, ready to ‘drive’ the research. The funders of a DH project described in this paper adhered to this positivistic assumption in their founding White Paper. They saw disciplines as blinders, best left behind in order to better see ‘patterns’. However, positivism was not a real-world option for the social scientists, mathematicians, and information scientists engaged in this ‘blue sky’ project, which investigated digitized historical newspaper texts. Far from being a hindrance to their work, disciplinary traditions were central to any success they achieved. Instead of moving ‘beyond’ disciplines, they developed a pluralist, cross-disciplinary dialogue. Each participant contributed out of the epistemic convention that had proven fruitful in their discipline. The approach required an intellectual and emotional commitment to dialogue, and produced tantalizing rather than wholly satisfying results. But it holds promise of more.
Affiliations:
1: Royal Netherlands Institute for Caribbean and Southeast Asian Studies (KITLV) Reuvensplaats 2, Postbus 9515, 2300 ra LeidenThe Netherlands klinken@kitlv.nl
1. BodRens"‘Het einde van de geesteswetenschappen 1.0 (The End of Humanities 1.0)’" 2012AmsterdamUniversity of Amsterdam, Faculteit der Geesteswetenschappen en de Faculteit der Natuurwetenschappen, Wiskunde en Informatica
2. CohenPatricia"‘Humanities 2.0: Digital Keys for Unlocking the Humanities’ Riches’" The New York Times2010November16retrieved 5 November 2016 from .
3. FickersAndreas"‘Veins Filled with the Diluted Sap of Rationality: A Critical Reply to Rens Bod’" BMGN – Low Countries Historical Review2013Vol 128 4155163Retrieved 5 November from . [Crossref]
4. HallGaryGoldMatthew K."‘Has Critical Theory Run Out of Time for Data-Driven Scholarship?’" Debates in the Digital Humanities2012MinneapolisUniversity of Minnesota Press
5. HicksJacqueline, TraagVincent, ReinandaRidho"‘Old Questions, New Techniques: A Research Note on the Computational Identification of Political Elites’" Comparative Sociology2015Vol 14 386401Retrieved 5 November 2016 from . [Crossref]
6. KaltenbrunnerWolfgang"‘Decomposition as Practice and Process: Creating Boundary Objects in Computational Humanities’" Interdisciplinary Science Reviews2014Vol 39 143161 [Crossref]
7. KaltenbrunnerWolfgang"‘Reflexive Inertia: Reinventing Scholarship through Digital Practices’" 2015PhD thesis, Leiden University. Retrieved 5 November 2016 from .
8. KlinkenGerry van"‘Introduction: Digital Methods in Asian Studies’" Asian Journal of Social Science2015Vol 43 539544 [Crossref]
9. LevineDonald N.Visions of the Sociological Tradition1995Chicago et al.University of Chicago Press
10. ReinandaRidho, MeijEdgar, de RijkeMaarten"‘Mining, Ranking and Recommending Entity Aspects’" Paper presented to sigir 2015: 38th international acm sigir conference on research and development in information retrieval2015263272Retrieved 5 November 2016 from .
11. ScheinfeldtTom"‘Sunset for Ideology, Sunrise for Methodology?’" Found History2008retrieved 5 November 2016 from .
12. ScheinfeldtTom"‘Where’s the Beef? Does Digital Humanities Have to Answer Questions?’" Found History2010May12retrieved 5 November 2016 from .
13. TraagVincent A."‘Complex Contagion of Campaign Donations’" PLoS ONE2016Vol 11 4retrieved 5 November 2016 from . [Crossref]
14. WillekensFrans, BaulieuAnne, BodRens, BoschAntal van den, HoningHenkjan, JongFranciska de, MandemakersKees, SchomakerLambert, van ZundertJoris"‘Computational Humanities’" 2010AmsterdamComputational Humanities Programme Committee, Royal Netherlands Academy of Arts and Sciences (KNAW)Retrieved 5 November 2016 from .
back to top