Cookies Policy

This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies.

I accept this policy

Find out more here

The Ecological Impact on Bonding and Religious Identity (环境因素对建立关系和宗教身份的影响∶中国研究生在美国两个社会文化环境中的个案分析)

No metrics data to plot.
The attempt to load metrics for this article has failed.
The attempt to plot a graph for these metrics has failed.
The full text of this article is not currently available.

Brill’s MyBook program is exclusively available on BrillOnline Books and Journals. Students and scholars affiliated with an institution that has purchased a Brill E-Book on the BrillOnline platform automatically have access to the MyBook option for the title(s) acquired by the Library. Brill MyBook is a print-on-demand paperback copy which is sold at a favorably uniform low price.

Access this article

+ Tax (if applicable)
Add to Favorites
You must be logged in to use this functionality

A Case of Chinese Graduate Students in Two Sociocultural Contexts in the United States

image of Review of Religion and Chinese Society

Linking concepts from networks, identities, and ecology, I draw on material collected during sixty interviews to show how a group of culturally homogeneous Chinese graduate students, when placed in two sociocultural environments in the United States, displayed different processes of religious identity network formation. In a large and heterogeneous community with more possible identities, students showed human agency by forming religious identities less constrained by networks. Human agency is also exemplified in the expansion of their religious circle of friends once they developed a religious identity. Religious identity often preceded networks. However, in a small and homogeneous community, students did emotion work to stay in pro-religious groups, presumably due to the limitations they had in choosing friends, particularly Chinese friends. The formation of networks more likely preceded the emergence of religious identities premised on the coexistence of multiple relationships in dyads and solidarity within primary groups. The narratives demonstrate how ecology matters for the formation of network ties and religious identity.根据对60个对硕士博士研究生的采访,通过运用网络分析、身份研究、和环境研究领域的概念,本文详述同属一个文化的中国留学生当处于美国两个不同城市文化环境中时,通过生活圈子发展特定身份的不同过程。在一个大型、充满差异的城市里,留学生的身份选择具有多样性。其主体性表现在自主选择宗教认同并扩大有宗教信仰的朋友圈子。他们的宗教认同常常先于他们的宗教朋友圈。而在一个小型、倡导同化的城市里,由于可选择的中国朋友人数少,留学生常常通过控制自我感情来维系与亲宗教的朋友的关系。他们的宗教网络常常先于他们的宗教认同。在这种环境中,当两人有多重社会关系,并处于一个高度团结的小群体中时,宗教认同才得以传播。本研究显示社区规模和文化是重要的影响身份和社会网络的环境因素。 (This article is in English.)

Affiliations: 1: University of Maryland Eastern Shore,


Full text loading...


Data & Media loading...

1. Abel Andrew. 2006. “"Favor Fishing and Punch-Bowl Christians".” Sociology of Religion Vol 67 (2): 161178.
2. Beyer Peter. 2003. “"Constitutional Privilege and Constituting Pluralism".” Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion Vol 42 (3): 333339.
3. Cantrell Randolph,, Krile James,, and Donohue George. 1980. “"The External Adaptation of Religious Organizations".” Sociology of Religion Vol 41 (4): 351364.
4. Carnes Tony,, and Yang Fenggang, eds. 2004. Asian American Religions . New York: New York University Press.
5. Coffey Amanda,, and Atkinson Paul. 1996. Making Sense of Qualitative Data . New York: Sage Publications.
6. Coleman James S. 1988. “"Social Capital in the Creation of Human Capital".” American Journal of Sociology Vol 94: 95120.
7. Cooley Charles H. 1992. Human Nature and the Social Order . New York: Scribner.
8. Durkheim Emile. 1997. The Division of Labor in Society . New York: Free Press.
9. Feld Scott L. 1981. “"The Focused Organization of Social Ties".” American Journal of Sociology Vol 86 (5): 10151035.
10. Frisby David,. 1990. “"Georg Simmel’s Concept of Society".” In Georg Simmel and Contemporary Sociology , edited by Kaern M.,, Philips B. S.,, and Cohen R. S., pp. 3955. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
11. Fuchs Stephen. 2001. Against Essentialism . Cambridge, ma: Harvard University Press.
12. Giddens Anthony. 1984. The Constitution of Society . Berkeley: University of California Press.
13. Glesne Corrine. 2011. Becoming Qualitative Researchers . Boston, ma: Pearson.
14. Goffman Erving,. 1978. “"The Presentation of Self in Everyday Life".” In Sociology , edited by Newman D. M., and Obrien J., pp. 161190. Los Angeles: Pine Forge Press.
15. Heise David R. 1977. “"Social Action as the Control of Affect".” Behavioral Science Vol 22 (3): 163177.
16. Hochschild Arlie R. 1979. “"Emotion Work, Feeling Rules, and Social Structure".” American Journal of Sociology Vol 85 (3): 551575.
17. Inden Ronald. 1990. Imagining India . Oxford: Blackwell.
18. Institute of International Education. 2013. “"Open Doors Fact Sheet: China".” Available online at.
19. Kasarda John D.,, and Janowitz Morris. 1974. “"Community Attachment in Mass Society".” American Sociological Review Vol 39 (3): 328339.
20. Lofland John,, and Stark Rodney. 1965. “"Becoming a World-Saver".” American Sociological Review Vol 30 (6): 862875.
21. Marsden Peter V. 1990. “"Network Data and Measurement".” Annual Review of Sociology Vol 16: 435463.
22. Mayhew Bruce H.,, Miller McPherson J.,, Levinge Roger L.,, and James Thomas F.. 1972. “"System Size and Structural Differentiation in Formal Organizations".” American Sociological Review Vol 37 (5): 629633.
23. McFarland Daniel,, Moody James,, Diehl David,, Smith Jeffrey A.,, and Thomas Reuben J.. 2014. “"Network Ecology and Adolescent Social Structure".” American Sociological Review Vol 79 (6): 10881121.
24. McPherson Miller,, Smith-Lovin Lynn,, and Cook James M.. 2001. “"Birds of a Feather".” Annual Review of Sociology Vol 27: 415444.
25. Mead George H. 1934. Mind, Self, and Society . Chicago, il: University of Chicago Press.
26. Merolla David M.,, Serpe Richard T.,, Stryker Sheldon,, and Wesley Schultz P.. 2012. “"Structural Precursors to Identity Processes".” Social Psychology Quarterly Vol 75 (2): 149172.
27. Ortner Sherry B. 2006. Anthropology and Social Theory . Durham, nc: Duke University Press.
28. Owens Timothy J.,, Robinson Dawn,, and Smith-Lovin Lynn. 2010. “"Three Faces of Identity".” Annual Review of Sociology Vol 36: 477499.
29. Patton Michael Q. 2002. Qualitative Research and Evaluation Methods . New York: Sage Publications.
30. Foundation Pew Research. 2013. Religious Landscape Study . (accessed January 25, 2017).
31. Powers William T. 1973. Behavior . Chicago, il: Aldine.
32. Smith-Lovin Lynn. 2007. “"The Strength of Weak Identities".” Social Psychology Quarterly Vol 70 (2): 106124.
33. Stark Tobias H. 2015. “"Understanding the Selection Bias".” Social Psychology Quarterly Vol 78 (2): 127150.
34. Stets Jen E.,, and Burke Peter J.. 2009. Identity Theory . Oxford: Oxford University Press.
35. Stryker Sheldon. 1980. Symbolic Interactionism . Menlo Park, ca: Benjamin Cummings.
36. Stryker Sheldon,. 1987. “"Identity Theory".” In Self and Identity , edited by Yardley K., and Hones T., pp. 89103. Oxford: John Wiley & Sons.
37. Suttles Gerald D. 1972. The Social Construction of Communities . Chicago, il: University of Chicago Press.
38. Tajfel Henri. 1982. “"Social Psychology of Intergroup Relations".” Annual Review of Psychology Vol 33: 139.
39. Thiessen Joel. 2016. “"A Culture of Faith".” Sociology of Religion Vol 77 (1): 104106.
40. u.s. Census Bureau. 2010. “2010 Census Data.” .
41. Verbrugge Lois M. 1979. “"Multiplexity in Adult Friendships".” Social Forces Vol 57 (4): 12861309.
42. Walker Mark H.,, and Lynn Freda B.. 2013. “"The Embedded Self".” Social Psychology Quarterly Vol 76 (2): 151179.
43. Wang Yuting,, and Yang Fenggang. 2006. “"More Than Evangelical and Ethnic".” Sociology of Religion Vol 67 (2): 179192.
44. Wellman Barry,, and Berkowitz S. D., eds. 1988. Social Structures: A Network Approach . New York: Cambridge University Press.
45. Wirth Louis. 1938. “"Urbanism as a Way of Life".” American Journal of Sociology Vol 44 (1): 124.
46. Yang Fenggang. 1998. “"Chinese Conversion to Evangelical Christianity".” Sociology of Religion Vol 59 (3): 237257.
47. Yang Fenggang. 2005. “"Lost in the Market, Saved at McDonald’s".” Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion Vol 44 (4): 423441.
48. Yang Fenggang. 2006. “"The Red, Black, and Gray Markets of Religion in China".” The Sociological Quarterly Vol 47:93122.
49. Yang Fenggang. 2010. Chinese Christians in America . University Park: Pennsylvania State University Press.
50. Yang Fenggang,, and Ebaugh Helen Rose. 2001a. “"Transformations in New Immigrant Religions and Their Global Implications".” American Sociological Review Vol 66 (2): 269288.
51. Yang Fenggang,, and Ebaugh Helen Rose. 2001b. “"Religion and Ethnicity among New Immigrants".” Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion Vol 40 (3): 367378.

Article metrics loading...



Can't access your account?
  • Tools

  • Add to Favorites
  • Printable version
  • Email this page
  • Subscribe to ToC alert
  • Get permissions
  • Recommend to your library

    You must fill out fields marked with: *

    Librarian details
    Your details
    Why are you recommending this title?
    Select reason:
    Review of Religion and Chinese Society — Recommend this title to your library
  • Export citations
  • Key

  • Full access
  • Open Access
  • Partial/No accessInformation