Cookies Policy
X

This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies.

I accept this policy

Find out more here

PIT MEMBRANES OF EPHEDRA RESEMBLE GYMNOSPERMS MORE THAN ANGIOSPERMS

No metrics data to plot.
The attempt to load metrics for this article has failed.
The attempt to plot a graph for these metrics has failed.
The full text of this article is not currently available.

Brill’s MyBook program is exclusively available on BrillOnline Books and Journals. Students and scholars affiliated with an institution that has purchased a Brill E-Book on the BrillOnline platform automatically have access to the MyBook option for the title(s) acquired by the Library. Brill MyBook is a print-on-demand paperback copy which is sold at a favorably uniform low price.

Access this article

+ Tax (if applicable)
Add to Favorites
You must be logged in to use this functionality

image of IAWA Journal

Bordered pit pairs of Ephedra species were characterized using different types of microscopy. Pit membranes contained tori that did not stain for lignin. SEM and AFM views of the torus surface showed no plasmodesmatal openings, but branched, secondary plasmodesmata were occasionally noted using TEM in conjunction with ultrathin sections. The margo consisted of radial microfibrils as well as finer diameter tangential fibrils. The former formed fascicles of fibrils that merged into even thicker buttresses during the act of pit membrane aspiration. AFM showed a discontinuous layer of non-microfibrillar material on the surface of both torus and margo. It is hypothesized that this material is responsible for adhesion of the pit membrane to the surface of the pit border during the process of aspiration. Taken as a whole, intervascular pit membranes of Ephedra more closely resemble those of conifers than those of torus-bearing pit membranes of angiosperms.

Affiliations: 1: Department of Biological Sciences, Auburn University, Life Sciences Building, Auburn, Alabama 36849-5407, U.S.A.; 2: Department of Polymer and Fiber Engineering, Auburn University, Auburn, Alabama,U.S.A.; 3: USDA-Forest Service, Southern Research Station, 2500 Shreveport Highway, Pineville, Louisiana 71360, U.S.A.; 4: Institute for Systematic Botany and Ecology, Ulm University, Albert-Einstein-Allee 11, D-89081, Ulm, Germany UMR BIOGECO, INRA, University of Bordeaux, Avenue des Facultés Bat. B2, 33405 Talence, France; 5: Institute for Systematic Botany and Ecology, Ulm University, Albert-Einstein-Allee 11, D-89081, Ulm, Germany

Loading

Full text loading...

/content/journals/10.1163/22941932-00000062
Loading

Data & Media loading...

http://brill.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journals/10.1163/22941932-00000062
Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1163/22941932-00000062
2014-09-09
2018-07-15

Sign-in

Can't access your account?
  • Tools

  • Add to Favorites
  • Printable version
  • Email this page
  • Subscribe to ToC alert
  • Get permissions
  • Recommend to your library

    You must fill out fields marked with: *

    Librarian details
    Your details
    Why are you recommending this title?
    Select reason:
     
    IAWA Journal — Recommend this title to your library
  • Export citations
  • Key

  • Full access
  • Open Access
  • Partial/No accessInformation