Cookies Policy

This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies.

I accept this policy

Find out more here

Analog and Digital Windowing of Attention in Language, Visual Perception, and the Brain

No metrics data to plot.
The attempt to load metrics for this article has failed.
The attempt to plot a graph for these metrics has failed.
The full text of this article is not currently available.

Brill’s MyBook program is exclusively available on BrillOnline Books and Journals. Students and scholars affiliated with an institution that has purchased a Brill E-Book on the BrillOnline platform automatically have access to the MyBook option for the title(s) acquired by the Library. Brill MyBook is a print-on-demand paperback copy which is sold at a favorably uniform low price.

Access this article

+ Tax (if applicable)
Add to Favorites
You must be logged in to use this functionality

image of Cognitive Semantics

This article theoretically bridges findings of linguistics, of visual perception, and of brain studies to generate novel interdisciplinary research ideas for attention. Specifically, this article lays out striking parallels of the windowing (scope) of attention in spatial cognition underlying language (as outlined by Talmy) and in spatial cognition underlying visual perception (as outlined by Laeng and colleagues). In both language and visual perception one finds analog windowing of attention and two basic forms of digital windowing of attention, one-portion windowing and two-portions split windowing. Additionally, linguistic evidence is provided that all basic attention-windowing types found in spatial cognition underlying language are also metaphorically mapped from spatial to temporal cognition—albeit there is some cross-cultural variation showing that not all time windowing types are found in all languages. Furthermore, analog and digital windowing is placed in the context of neural networks. Implications for future research are discussed.

Affiliations: 1: Department of Psychology, University of Zurich, Chair of Cognitive Science, ETH Swiss Federal Institute of Technology Zurich, Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, University Hospital Zurich, Switzerland, ; 2: Department of Psychology, University of Oslo, Norway,


Full text loading...


Data & Media loading...

1. Awh Edward, and Pashler Harold. 2000. “"Evidence for split attentional foci".” Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance Vol 26: 834846.
2. Bergen B. K.,, & Ting Ting Chan Lau. 2012, "Writing direction affects how people map space onto time". Frontiers in Psychology Vol 3: 15.
3. Boroditsky Lera. 2000. “"Metaphoric structuring: Understanding time through spatial metaphors".” Cognition Vol 75: 128.
4. Boroditsky Lera, and Gaby Alice. 2010. “"Remembrances of times east: Absolute spatial representations of time in an Australian aboriginal community".” Psychological Science Vol 21(9): 16351639.
5. Casasanto Daniel, and Boroditsky Lera. 2008. “"Time in the mind: Using space to think about time".” Cognition Vol 106: 579593.
6. Cavanagh Patrick, and Alvarez George A.. 2005. “"Tracking multiple targets with multifocal attention".” Trends in Cognitive Sciences Vol 9: 349354.
7. Corballis Michael C. 1991. “The lopsided ape. Evolution of the generative mind .” New York: Oxford University Press.
8. Falasca N. Walter,, Stefania D’Ascenzo, Di Domenico Alberto,, Onofrj Marco,, Tommasi Luca,, Laeng Bruno,, and Franciotti Raffaella. 2015. "Hemispheric lateralization in top-down attention during spatial relation processing: A Granger causal model approach". European Journal of Neuroscience : 111.
9. Franciotti Raffaella,, Stefania D’Ascenzo, Di Domenico Alberto,, Onofrj Marco,, Tommasi Luca,, and Laeng Bruno. 2013. “"Focusing narrowly or broadly attention when judging categorical and coordinate spatial relations: A meg Study".” PLoS ONE Vol 8(10): e83434.
10. Hartmann Matthias,, Corinna S Martarelli,, Fred W Mast,, and Kurt Stocker. 2014. “"Eye movements during mental time travel follow a diagonal line".” Consciousness and Cognition Vol 30: 201209.
11. Hartmann Matthias, and Mast Fred W.. 2012. “"Moving along the mental time line influences the processing of future related words".” Consciousness and Cognition Vol 2: 15581562.
12. Hinton Geoffrey E.,, McClelland James L., and Rumelhart David E.,. 1986. “"Distributed representations".” In Rumelhart David E., and McClelland James L. (Eds.), Parallel distributed processing: Explorations in the microstructure of cognition . VolumeVol 1: Foundations (pp. 77109). Cambridge, ma: mit Press.
13. Jacobs Robert A., and Kosslyn Stephen M.. 1994. “"Encoding shape and spatial relations: The role of receptive field size in coordinating complementary representations".” Cognitive Science Vol 18: 361386.
14. Kosslyn Stephen M. 1987. “"Seeing and imagining in the cerebral hemispheres: A computational approach".” Psychological Review Vol 94: 148175.
15. Kosslyn Stephen M. 1994. Image and brain: The resolution of the imagery debate . Cambridge, ma: mit Press.
16. Kosslyn Stephen M.,, Christopher F. Chabris,, Chad J. Marsolek and Olivier Koenig. 1992. “"Categorical versus coordinate spatial relations: Computational analyses and computer simulations".” Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance Vol 18(2): 562577.
17. Kosslyn Stephen M., and Jacobs Robert A.,. 1994. "Encoding shape and spatial relations: A simple mechanism for coordinating complementary representations". In Uhr Leonard, and Honavar Vasant (Eds.), Artificial intelligence and neural networks: Steps toward principled integration (pp. 373385). Boston: Academic Press.
18. Laeng Bruno. 1994. “"Lateralization of categorical and coordinate spatial functions: A study of unilateral stroke patients".” Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience Vol 6: 189203.
19. Laeng Bruno, 2013. “"Representation of spatial relations".” In Ochsner Kevin N., and Kosslyn Stephen M. (Eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Cognitive Neuroscience , VolumeVol 1: Core Topics (pp. 2859). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
20. Laeng Bruno,, Okubo Matia,, Saneyoshi Ayako, and Michimata Chikashi. 2011. “"Processing spatial relations with different apertures of attention".” Cognitive Science Vol 35: 297329.
21. Lakoff George. 1990. “"The invariance hypothesis: Is abstract reason based on image-schemas?”" Cognitive Linguistics Vol 1(1): 3974.
22. Lakoff George, and Johnson Mark. 1980. Metaphors we live by . Chicago, il: University of Chicago Press.
23. Lakoff George, and Johnson Mark 1999. Philosophy in the flesh . New York, ny: Basic Books.
24. Guen Le,, Olivier,. 2012. “"An exploration in the domain of time: From Yucatec Maya time gestures to Yucatec Maya Sign Language time signs".” In Zeshan U., & de Vos C. (Eds.), Sign languages in village communities: Anthropological and linguistic insights (pp. 209250). Berlin: De Gruyter.
25. Guen Le, Olivier and Lorena Idefonsa Pool Balam. 2012. “"No metaphorical timeline in gesture and cognition among Yucatec Mayas".” Frontiers in Psychology Vol 3: 271.
26. McGlone Matthew S., and Harding Jennifer L.. 1998. “"Back (or forward?) to the future: The role of perspective in temporal language comprehension".” Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition Vol 24(5): 12111223.
27. Posner Michael I.. 1980. “"Orienting of attention".” Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology Vol 32: 325.
28. Moore Kevin E. 2006. “"Space-to-time mappings and temporal concepts".” Cognitive Linguistics Vol 17(2): 199244.
29. Núñez Rafael E., and Sweetser Eve. 2006. “"With the future behind them: Convergent evidence from Aymara language and gesture in the crosslinguistic comparison of spatial construals of time".” Cognitive Science Vol 30(3): 401450.
30. O’Keefe, John. 2003. “"Vector grammar, places, and the functional role of spatial prepositions in English".” In van der Zee Emile, and Slack Jon (Eds.), Representing direction in language and space (pp. 6985). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
31. O’Reilly,, Randall C,, Stephen M. Kosslyn,, Chad J. Marsolek, and Christopher F. Chabris. 1990. “"Receptive field characteristics that allow parietal lobe neurons to encode spatial properties of visual input: A computational analysis".” Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience Vol 2: 141155.
32. Okubo Matia,, Laeng Bruno,, Saneyoshi Ayako, and Michimata Chikashi. 2010. “"Exogenous attention differentially modulates the processing of categorical and coordinate spatial relations".” Acta Psychologica Vol 135: 111.
33. Isabelle Otto,, Grandguillaume Philippe,, Boutkhil Latifa,, Burnod Yves, and Guigon Emmanuel. 1992. "Direct and indirect cooperation between temporal and parietal networks for invariant visual recognition". Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience Vol 4(1): 3557.
34. Pinker Steven. 2007. The stuff of thought: Language as a window into human nature . New York: Viking.
35. Rueckl,, Jay G.,, Kyle R. Cave, and Stephen M. Kosslyn. 1989. "Why are “what” and “where” processed by separate cortical visual systems? A computational investigation". Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience Vol 1(2): 171186.
36. Jacobs Robert A.. 1999. "Computational studies of the development of functionally specialized neural modules". Trends in Cognitive Sciences Vol 3: 3138.
37. Spivey Michael J., and Geng Joy J.. 2001. “"Oculomotor mechanisms activated by imagery and memory: Eye movements to absent objects".” Psychological Research Vol 65: 235241.
38. Kurt Stocker. 2012. “"The time machine in our mind".” Cognitive Science Vol 36(3): 385420.
39. Stocker Kurt. 2013. “"Digital causal cognition".” International Journal of Cognitive LinguisticsVol 4(1): 934.
40. Stocker Kurt. 2014. “"The theory of cognitive spacetime".” Metaphor and Symbol Vol 29(2): 7193.
41. Stocker Kurt. 2015. “"Toward an embodied cognitive semantics".” Cognitive Semantics , Vol 1(2): 178212.
42. Stocker Kurt,, Hartmann Matthias,, Martarelli Corinna S.,, and Mast Fred W.. 2016. “"Eye movements reveal mental looking through time".” Cognitive Science Vol 30: 201209.
43. Talmy Leonard. 2000a. “"Fictive motion in language and ‘ception’".” In Toward a cognitive semantics, Volume 1: Concept structuring systems (chapter 2). Cambridge, ma: mit Press.
44. Talmy Leonard. 2000b. “"The windowing of attention in language".” In Toward a cognitive semantics, Volume 1: Concept structuring systems (chapter 4). Cambridge, ma: mit Press.
45. Talmy Leonard,. 2003. "Recombinance in the evolution of language". In Cihlar Jon,, Franklin Amy,, Kaiser David, and Kimbara Irene (Eds.) Proceedings of the 39th annual meeting of the Chicago Linguistics Society Vol 39: 3366. Chicago Linguistic Society.
46. Talmy Leonard,. 2007. “"Attention Phenomena".” In The Oxford handbook of cognitive linguistics , edited by Geeraerts Dirk, and Cuyckens Hubert, 264293. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
47. Talmy Leonard,. 2010. " Digitalization in the evolution of language". In Fuyin Li Thomas, and Gao Yuan (Eds.) Ten lectures on cognitive semantics by Leonard Talmy [2007] (pp. 441502). Beijing: Foreign Language Teaching and Research Press.
48. Talmy Leonard. 2015. “"Relating language to other cognitive systems: An overview" .” Cognitive Semantics Vol 1(1): 144.
49. Tocci Ronald J.,, Widmer Neal S., and Moss Greg L.. 2011. Digital systems: Principles and applications . New Jersey: Pearson (9th edition).
50. Torralbo Ana,, Santiago Julio,, and Lupiáñez Juan. 2006. “"Flexible conceptual projection of time onto spatial frames of reference".” Cognitive Science Vol 30: 745757.
51. Treisman Anne 2006. "How the deployment of attention determines what we see". Visual Cognition Vol 2: 411443.
52. Tversky Barbara,, Kugelmass Sol,, and Winter Atalia. 1991. “"Cross-cultural and developmental trends in graphic productions".” Cognitive Psychology Vol 23: 515557.
53. Ulrich Rolf,., Eikmeier Verena,, de la Vega Irmgard,, Fernández Susana Ruiz,, Simone Alex-Ruf,, and Claudia Maienborn. 2012. “"With the past behind and the future ahead: Back-to-front representation of past and future sentences".” Memory & Cognition Vol 40: 483495.
54. Ulrich Rolf, and Maienborn Claudia. 2010. “"Left–right coding of past and future in language: The mental timeline during sentence processing".” Cognition Vol 117(2): 126138.
55. Yuan Lei,, David Uttal,, and Franconeri Steven. 2016. “"Are categorical spatial relations encoded by shifting visual attention between objects?”" PLoS ONE Vol 11 (8): e0163141.

Article metrics loading...



Can't access your account?
  • Tools

  • Add to Favorites
  • Printable version
  • Email this page
  • Subscribe to ToC alert
  • Get permissions
  • Recommend to your library

    You must fill out fields marked with: *

    Librarian details
    Your details
    Why are you recommending this title?
    Select reason:
    Cognitive Semantics — Recommend this title to your library
  • Export citations
  • Key

  • Full access
  • Open Access
  • Partial/No accessInformation