Cookies Policy
X

This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies.

I accept this policy

Find out more here

The Notion of Philosophical Knowledge and the Situation of Philosophy Today

No metrics data to plot.
The attempt to load metrics for this article has failed.
The attempt to plot a graph for these metrics has failed.
The full text of this article is not currently available.

Brill’s MyBook program is exclusively available on BrillOnline Books and Journals. Students and scholars affiliated with an institution that has purchased a Brill E-Book on the BrillOnline platform automatically have access to the MyBook option for the title(s) acquired by the Library. Brill MyBook is a print-on-demand paperback copy which is sold at a favorably uniform low price.

Access this article

+ Tax (if applicable)
Add to Favorites
You must be logged in to use this functionality

In this volume, scholars in the human sciences from different countries examine the meaning of philosophical knowledge today. The answer to the question of what is philosophical knowledge is not self-evident because of different cultural traditions in which national philosophies are situated. Thus philosophical knowledge can be understood as knowledge of history of philosophy, or of philosophical systems, schools and methodologies; or it can be seen as the ability to solve philosophical problems. Sometimes philosophical investigations affect not philosophy alone, but extend to other disciplines. One significant fact is that the problem of philosophical knowledge is not restricted to the theory of philosophy, but reflects the situation in philosophy itself, as well as the status of philosophy among other human sciences and its social prestige in general. Whether we still need philosophy today, in the period of total austerity, will depend upon what criteria we use to define the image of philosophy and its knowledge. On the other hand, the concerns about philosophy today – diagnosed in the present volume – are not merely intra-disciplinary; they are decisive for social outcomes in the world of today. These social outcomes – for educational curricula, for the position of women and minorities, for the political process and the formation of civil society – are the focus of the papers in this issue. In its totality, the issue offers an overview of the contemporary situation in philosophy in different countries in the ‘new’ Europe, which allows reflection about the differences and general tendencies in its development.

Affiliations: 1: University Marburg, soboleva@mailer.uni-marburg.de

10.1163/23751606-01202001
/content/journals/10.1163/23751606-01202001
dcterms_title,pub_keyword,dcterms_description,pub_author
10
5
Loading
Loading

Full text loading...

/content/journals/10.1163/23751606-01202001
Loading

Data & Media loading...

1. Böhme G."Selbstinszenierung: Über Ruhm in der Philosophie", in: Information Philosophie , 29.01.2015,
2. Frank M. ‘"Hegel wohnt hier nicht mehr’", Frankfurter Allgemeine Zeitung , September 24, 2015, accessed February 13, 2016,.
3. greph, Qui a peur de la philosophie? (Paris: Flammarion, 1977).
4. Kant I., Conflict of the Faculties . Transl. by Mary L. Gregor (Lincoln: University of Nebraska Press, 1979).
5. Khorkov M."Brief aus Russland", in: Deutsche Zeitschrift für Philosophie , Vol 61 (2013), 3, 437446.
6. Levy N."Analytic and Continental Philosophy: Explaining the Differences". Metaphilosophy , Vol 34, (2003), 3, 284304.
7. McLaughlin K. Philosophy on France today (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1983).
8. O’Shea J.R.,"Conceptual Connections: Kant and the Twentieth Century Analytic Tradition", in: G. Bird (ed.), The Blackwell Companion to Kant . (Oxford: Blackwell, 2007).
9. Pieper J.,"The conditions of philosophy today", in: V.W. Hudson,, D.W. Morgan (ed.), The Future of Thomism (Notre Dame, in: University of Notre Dame, 1992) 2338.
10. Prado C.G. (Ed.) A House Divided: Comparing Analytic and Continental Philosophy (New York: Humanity books, 2003).
11. Rescher N. American Philosophy today and other Studies (Savage, md: Rowman & Littlefield, 1994).
12. Shanker S.G. (Ed.) Philosophy in Britain Today (Albany, ny: State University of New York Press, 1986).
13. Soboleva M. (Ed.) Poccийcкaя пocтcoвeтcкaя филocoфия: oпыт caмoaнaлизa [Russian Post-Soviet Philosophy: An Attempt of Self-Analysis] (Munich: Otto Sagner, 2009).
http://brill.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journals/10.1163/23751606-01202001
Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1163/23751606-01202001
2016-02-11
2017-11-25

Sign-in

Can't access your account?
  • Tools

  • Add to Favorites
  • Printable version
  • Email this page
  • Subscribe to ToC alert
  • Get permissions
  • Recommend to your library

    You must fill out fields marked with: *

    Librarian details
    Your details
    Why are you recommending this title?
    Select reason:
     
    Transcultural Studies — Recommend this title to your library
  • Export citations
  • Key

  • Full access
  • Open Access
  • Partial/No accessInformation