Cookies Policy

This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies.

I accept this policy

Find out more here

The Professionalization of Philosophy and the Criteria of Philosophical Knowledge

No metrics data to plot.
The attempt to load metrics for this article has failed.
The attempt to plot a graph for these metrics has failed.
The full text of this article is not currently available.

Brill’s MyBook program is exclusively available on BrillOnline Books and Journals. Students and scholars affiliated with an institution that has purchased a Brill E-Book on the BrillOnline platform automatically have access to the MyBook option for the title(s) acquired by the Library. Brill MyBook is a print-on-demand paperback copy which is sold at a favorably uniform low price.

Access this article

+ Tax (if applicable)
Add to Favorites
You must be logged in to use this functionality

image of Transcultural Studies

In this paper, I investigate the issue of the professionalization of philosophy, taking as my starting point the debate triggered by the publication of Diego Marconi’s monograph, Il mestiere di pensare (Thinking as a Trade, 2014). This debate about the state of the art of Italian philosophy and the increased tendency towards specialization in philosophy is still on-going. It raises the issue of how to understand the putative split between analytic and continental philosophy, and how to establish standards or criteria for evaluating the quality of philosophical research. I conclude by posing the question about what needs to change in our knowledge practices and suggest that what is needed is an overhauling of our conceptions of trust, reliance, testimony, and justice, with a view to re-defining how social identity affects the way we operate in philosophical practice and how we establish our credibility.

Affiliations: 1: University of Turin,


Full text loading...


Data & Media loading...

1. Anderson E., 2012, ‘"Epistemic Justice as a Virtue of Social Institutions’", Social Epistemology Vol 26 (2): 16373.
2. Antony L., 2012, ‘"Different Voices or Perfect Storm: Why are there so few Women in Philosophy?’", Journal of Social Philosophy Vol 43 (3): 227255.
3. Cudd A. E., 2005, ‘"Missionary Positions’", Hypatia: A Journal of Feminist Philosophy Vol 20 (4): 164182.
4. Freeland C.,, 1994, ‘"Nourishing Speculation: A Feminist Reading of Aristotelian Science"’, in Engendering Origins: Critical Feminist Readings in Plato and Aristotle ed. On Bat-Ami Bar (Albany: State University of New York Press), 14546.
5. Fricker M., 2007, Epistemic Injustice: Power and the Ethics of Knowing (Oxford: University Press).
6. Hamlyn D. W., 1992, Being a Philosopher: The History of a Practice ( London: Routledge).
7. Haslanger S., 2000, ‘"Gender and Race: (What) Are They? (What) Do We Want Them To Be?"’, Noûs Vol 34 (1)(2000): 3155.
8. Haslanger S., 2008, ‘"Changing the Ideology and Culture of Philosophy: Not by Reason (Alone)’", Hypatia Vol 23 (2): 210223.
9. Marconi D., 2014, Il mestiere di pensare , (Torino: Einaudi).
10. Saul J.,, 2013, ‘"Implicit Bias, Stereotype Threat and Women in Philosophy"’, in Women in Philosophy: What Needs to Change?. eds. Jenkins F.,, Hutchison K. (Oxford: Oxford University Press) 3960.
11. Steele C. M., 2010, Whistling Vivaldi: How Stereotypes Affect Us and What We Can Do , (New York: W.W. Norton).
12. Steele C. M.,, Aronson J., 1995, ‘"Stereotype threat and the intellectual test performance of African Americans’", Journal of Personality and Social Psychology (Vol 69): 797811.
13. Townley C., 2011, A Defense of Ignorance: Its Value for Knowers and Roles in Feminist and Social Epistemologies (Plymouth: Lexington Books).
14. Tripodi V., 2015, ‘"Intuition, Gender and the Under-representation of Women in Philosophy"’, Rivista di Estetica (Vol 58) (1): 134144.
15. Valian V., 1998, Why so slow? The advancement of women (Cambridge (ma): The m.i.t. Press).
16. Valian V., 2005, ‘"Beyond gender schemas: Improving the advancement of women in academia’", Hypatia (Vol 20): 198213.
17. Witt C., (2007), ‘"Feminist History of Philosophy"’. In The Stanford Encyclopaedia of Philosophy , ed. Zalta E. N. (url = ).
18. Witt C. (2006), ‘"Feminist Interpretations of the Philosophical Canon"’, Signs: Journal of Women in Culture and Society , (Vol 31) (2): 537552.

Article metrics loading...



Can't access your account?
  • Tools

  • Add to Favorites
  • Printable version
  • Email this page
  • Subscribe to ToC alert
  • Get permissions
  • Recommend to your library

    You must fill out fields marked with: *

    Librarian details
    Your details
    Why are you recommending this title?
    Select reason:
    Transcultural Studies — Recommend this title to your library
  • Export citations
  • Key

  • Full access
  • Open Access
  • Partial/No accessInformation