Cookies Policy
X

This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies.

I accept this policy

Find out more here

Productive and Creative Poiesis and the Work of Art

No metrics data to plot.
The attempt to load metrics for this article has failed.
The attempt to plot a graph for these metrics has failed.
The full text of this article is not currently available.

Brill’s MyBook program is exclusively available on BrillOnline Books and Journals. Students and scholars affiliated with an institution that has purchased a Brill E-Book on the BrillOnline platform automatically have access to the MyBook option for the title(s) acquired by the Library. Brill MyBook is a print-on-demand paperback copy which is sold at a favorably uniform low price.

Access this article

+ Tax (if applicable)
Add to Favorites
You must be logged in to use this functionality

image of Transcultural Studies

There are two ancient formulations of the problem art presents to us: poiesis understands art as a generic ontological problem and techné treats art as a particular kind of work—a skilful, intentional practice to deviate processes of becoming. Arguably, this distinction leads to very different procedures for determining the ‘work of art’; poiesis considers artistic praxis as resolved into the artefact while techné considers it as a problem in-itself. This tension is evident in the generic designation of the ‘work of art’ which tends to conflate process with what this process produces. This conflation about the work of art can be illuminated via a return to Aristotle’s concept of techné. This is because techné (the kind of work art performs) remains irreducible to both poiesis (to make) and praxis (deliberative action). Where poiesis and praxis are constructive activities differentiated by their intentional ends, techné remains a more foundational power to work upon processes of material causation. What these Aristotelian distinctions clarify is that the work of art is neither resolvable in the terms of its productions (poiesis) or the terms of its practices (praxis, deliberative actions); rather, art works by deviating these productive processes in the midst of their becoming, by bringing unprecedented differences into being. As such, the work of art apprehended by Aristotelian techné is not reducible to any poiesis; it works upon and divides poiesis into another workflow—a creative poiesis. The work of art thus appears as a creative, causal power counter-posed to all production.

Affiliations: 1: University of Western Sydney, J.Tuckwell@westernsydney.edu.au

10.1163/23751606-01302001
/content/journals/10.1163/23751606-01302001
dcterms_title,pub_keyword,dcterms_description,pub_author
10
5
Loading
Loading

Full text loading...

/content/journals/10.1163/23751606-01302001
Loading

Data & Media loading...

1. Adams Ansell,. ‘"A Personal Credo (1943)"’ in Photography in Print: Writings from 1816 to the Present . ed. Goldberg Vicki. New York: Simon and Schuster, 1981.
2. Adorno Theodor W,. Aesthetic Theory . ed. Adorno Gretel, and Tiedemann Rolf,, trans. Hullot-Kentor Robert. London, New York: Continuum, 2002.
3. Aristotle,. The Loeb Classical Library. No. 73, The Nicomachean Ethics . Eds. Loeb James,, G.P. Goold,, and H. Rackham. Cambridge, Mass: Harvard University Press, 1926.
4. Aristotle,. ‘"Nicomachean Ethics".’ in The Complete Works of Aristotle: v. 2: Revised Oxford Translation . ed. Jonathan Barnes. Princeton: Pr, 1984.
5. Aristotle,. ‘"Physics".’ The Complete Works of Aristotle: v. 1: Revised Oxford Translation . ed. Barnes Jonathan. Princeton: Pr, 1984.
6. Aristotle,. ‘"Poetics".’ The Complete Works of Aristotle: v. 1: Revised Oxford Translation . ed. Barnes Jonathan. Princeton: Pr, 1984.
7. Aristotle,. ‘"Politics".’ The Complete Works of Aristotle: v. 1: Revised Oxford Translation . ed. Barnes Jonathan. Princeton: Pr, 1984.
8. Aristotle,. Posterior Analytics, The Loeb Classical Library. No. 391 . Eds. Loeb James,, J. Henderson,, and H. Tredennick. Cambridge, Mass: Harvard University Press, 1960.
9. Benjamin Walter,, ‘"Author as Producer".’ in The Work of Art in the Age of Its Technological Reproducibility, and Other Writings on Media . eds. William Michael Jennings,, Doherty Brigid,, Y. Thomas Levin,, and Jephcott F.N. E. Cambridge, ma: Belknap Press of Harvard University Press, 2008.
10. Benjamin Walter,. ‘The Work of Art in the Age of Its Technological Reproducibility .’ in The Work of Art in the Age of Its Technological Reproducibility, and Other Writings on Media . eds. William Michael Jennings,., Doherty Brigid,, Y. Thomas Levin,, and Jephcott F. N. E. Cambridge, ma: Belknap Press of Harvard University Press, 2008.
11. Danto Arthur. The Artworld . The Journal of Philosophy, Vol. Vol 61, Issue 19, American Philosophical Association Eastern Division Sixty-First Annual Meeting (Oct. 15, 1964), 571584. http://www.jstor.org/stable/2022937.
12. Eliot Thomas S. The Sacred Wood: Essays on Poetry and Criticism . London: Methuen, 1960.
13. Godel K., ‘"On Formally Undecidable Propositions of Principia Mathematica and Related Systems i (1931)".’ in Frege to Gödel: a source book in mathematical logic, 1879–1931 . Ed. van Heijenoort Jean. Harvard University Press, 2002.
14. Heidegger Martin,. Being and Time . trans Macquarrie John, and Robinson Edward. New York: HarperPerennial/Modern Thought, 2008.
15. Hetherington Stephen,, “"How to Know (that Knowledge-that is Knowledge-how)",” in Epistemology Futures , Hetherington S. (ed.), Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2006.
16. Kandinsky Wassily (1911). "Concerning the Spiritual in Art". Kessinger Publishing.Vol 2004.
17. Nussbaum Martha C. The Fragility of Goodness: Luck and Ethics in Greek Tragedy and Philosophy (Revised Edition) . Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 2001.
18. Plato,. ‘"Symposium’" in Plato, The Collected Dialogues . ed. Hamilton Edith, and Cairns Huntington. Princeton, nj.: Princeton University Press, 1961.
19. Ryle Gilbert, 1949, The Concept of Mind , Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
20. Sayers Sean. ‘"Creative Activity and Alienation in Hegel and Marx".’ in Historical Materialism , volume Vol 11:1 (107128), Koninklijke Brill nv, Leiden, 2003.
21. Simondon G., On the Mode of Existence of Technical Objects . trans. Malaspina Cécile,, and Rogove John. Minneapolis, mn: Univocal Publishing, 2017.
22. Simondon G.,"Technical Mentality". Trans. De Boever Arne. Parrhesia, Vol. Vol 7, 2009, 1727
23. Tuckwell J. Creation and the Function of Art: Techné, Poiesis and the Problem of Aesthetics . London: Bloomsbury, 2017.
http://brill.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journals/10.1163/23751606-01302001
Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1163/23751606-01302001
2017-02-01
2018-06-24

Sign-in

Can't access your account?
  • Tools

  • Add to Favorites
  • Printable version
  • Email this page
  • Subscribe to ToC alert
  • Get permissions
  • Recommend to your library

    You must fill out fields marked with: *

    Librarian details
    Your details
    Why are you recommending this title?
    Select reason:
     
    Transcultural Studies — Recommend this title to your library
  • Export citations
  • Key

  • Full access
  • Open Access
  • Partial/No accessInformation