Cookies Policy
X

This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies.

I accept this policy

Find out more here

Network Perspectives on Chinese Dialect History

No metrics data to plot.
The attempt to load metrics for this article has failed.
The attempt to plot a graph for these metrics has failed.
The full text of this article is not currently available.

Brill’s MyBook program is exclusively available on BrillOnline Books and Journals. Students and scholars affiliated with an institution that has purchased a Brill E-Book on the BrillOnline platform automatically have access to the MyBook option for the title(s) acquired by the Library. Brill MyBook is a print-on-demand paperback copy which is sold at a favorably uniform low price.

Access this article

+ Tax (if applicable)
Add to Favorites
You must be logged in to use this functionality

Chances and Challenges: 從演化網絡的角度來研究漢語方言史——機遇與挑戰

Little is known about the history of Chinese dialects. Major dialect groups were identified long ago using various traditional criteria, such as tonal and segmental development from their presumed common ancestor; however, scholarly agreement about their detailed development is largely lacking. At the core of the problem lies the role that language contact played in the history of Chinese. Unlike in the case of other language families, the Chinese dialects never really separated into distinct, independent languages, but kept evolving in close contact to each other. As a result, it is hard to tell whether traits shared among the dialects have been inherited or borrowed. Recent network approaches from a biological perspective could show a way out of this dilemma, since they were specifically designed to handle vertical and horizontal aspects in bacterial evolution, and the first pilot studies in historical linguistics have reported promising results. In this paper, a case study on the application of network approaches in Chinese historical linguistics is presented. Based on a dataset of 200 basic items translated into 23 Chinese dialect varieties, competing proposals for Chinese dialect classification are compared and tested for general plausibility. The results of the comparison show that network approaches are a useful supplement for quantitative and qualitative approaches in Chinese historical linguistics. In order to reach their full potential, however, the underlying evolutionary models need to be more closely adapted to linguistic needs, and additional evidence, like geographic information, needs to be taken into account. (This article is in English.) 提要 目前,學界對漢語方言歷史的了解還不夠完整。語言學家運用各種傳統方法與標準,試圖從假設的共同祖語來擬定聲調或音段的發展,從而界定主要的方言區。但是,有關聲調、音段的發展細節,學界尚遠未達成共識。學者們意見不統一的主要原因在於語言接觸在漢語方言歷史上所扮演的角色。漢語方言的情況跟其他語言不一樣:它們從來沒有真正分開過,也從來沒有獨立地發展,而是不斷在相互影響中演變。因此,我們很難確定方言之間的共同特征是從祖語繼承而來的還是從其他方言中借過來的。最新的生物學演化網絡方法可以作為借鑒,這昭示出歷史語言學一個新的探索方向。這類方法運用縱向及橫向網絡以了解細菌的演化過程。語言學家開始運用這些方法來研究語言的發展,并已獲得可喜的初步成績。本文以漢語方言作為專題研究,運用演化網絡方法來分析漢語歷史語言學的問題。在具體操作上,我們精心挑選了200個核心詞彙,並在該基礎上建立了23種漢語方言的數據集。隨後,筆者針對漢語方言的各種分類理論作出了不同的比較和測試,從而判斷其普遍合理性。比較的結果表明,演化網絡方法對漢語方言史的定量和定性研究起到了舉足輕重的補充作用。為了充分發揮其潛力,我們需要建立更適合語言學研究的演化發展模型,例如加入地理信息等其他佐證,才能夠更全面、更細緻地描述漢語方言的歷史演變。

Affiliations: 1: cnrs-crlao-inalco-ehess, mattis.list@lingpy.org 法國國家科學研究院

10.1163/2405478X-00801002
/content/journals/10.1163/2405478x-00801002
dcterms_title,pub_keyword,dcterms_description,pub_author
10
5
Loading
Loading

Full text loading...

/content/journals/10.1163/2405478x-00801002
Loading

Data & Media loading...

1. Aikhenvald Alexandra Y. , 2007. "Grammars in contact. A cross-linguistic perspective". In: Aikhenvald Alexandra Y. ,, Dixon R. M. V. (eds.), Grammars in contact . Oxford: Oxford University Press, 166.
2. Bandelt H. J. ,, Dress A. W. 1992. "Split decomposition: a new and useful approach to phylogenetic analysis of distance data". Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution Vol 1 (3): 242252. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/1055-7903(92)90021-8
3. Baxter William H. 2006. "Mandarin dialect phylogeny". Cahiers de Linguistique – Asie Orientale Vol 35 (1): 71114. http://dx.doi.org/10.3406/clao.2006.1748
4. Dàxué Běijīng ,. 北京大學 (ed.). 1962 [1989]. 《"漢語方音字匯"》 [Chinese dialect character pronunciation list]. 北京:文字改革出版社.
5. Hamed Ben , Mahé. 2005. "Neighbour-Nets portray the Chinese dialect continuum and the linguistic legacy of China’s demic history". Proceedings of the Royal Society London, Series B Vol 272 (1567): 10151022. http://dx.doi.org/10.1098/rspb.2004.3015
6. Hamed Ben ,, Mahé ,, Wang ,, Feng . 2006. "Stuck in the forest: Trees, networks and Chinese dialects". Diachronica Vol 23: 2960. http://dx.doi.org/10.1075/dia.23.1.04ham
7. Branner David P. 2000. Problems in comparative Chinese dialectology . The classification of Miin and Hakka. Berlin and New York: Mouton de Gruyter.
8. Brugmann Karl . 1886 [1967]. Einleitung und Lautlehre: vergleichende Laut-, Stammbildungs- und Flexionslehre der indogermanischen Sprachen. In: Grundriß der vergleichenden Grammatik der indogermanischen Sprachen. Berlin, Leipzig: Walter de Gruyter.
9. Bryant David ,, Moulton Vincent . 2004. "Neighbor-Net. An agglomerative method for the construction of phylogenetic networks". Molecular Biology and Evolution Vol 21 (2): 255265.
10. Cohen Ofir ,, Pupko Tal . 2010. "Inference and characterization of horizontally transferred gene families using stochastic mapping". Molecular Biology and Evolution Vol 27 (3): 703713. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/molbev/msp240
11. Dagan Tal ,, Martin William . 2007. "Ancestral genome sizes specify the minimum rate of lateral gene transfer during prokaryote evolution". Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences u.s.a. Vol 104 (3): 870875. http://dx.doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0606318104
12. Dagan Tal ,, Artzy-Randrup Y. ,, Martin William . 2008. "Modular networks and cumulative impact of lateral transfer in prokaryote genome evolution". Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences u.s.a. Vol 105 (29): 1003910044. http://dx.doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0800679105
13. Dessimoz Christophe ,, Margadant Daniel , and Gonnet Gaston H. , 2008. " dlight – Lateral gene transfer detection using pairwise evolutionary distances in a statistical framework". In: Vingron M. ,, Won L. (eds.). Research in Computational Molecular Biology .Berlin and Heidelberg: Springer, 315330.
14. Dunn Michael ,, Terrill Angela ,, Reesink Ger ,, Foley Robert A. ,, Levinson Stephen C. 2005: "Structural phylogenetics and the reconstruction of ancient language history". Science Vol 309 (5743): 20722075. http://dx.doi.org/10.1126/science.1114615
15. Hóu Jīngyī . 侯精一 (ed.). 2004. 《"現代漢語方言音庫"》 [Phonological database of Chinese dialects]. 上海上海教育出版社.
16. Huson Daniel H. 1998. “"SplitsTree. Analyzing and visualizing evolutionary data”". Bioinformatics Vol 14: 6873. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/bioinformatics/14.1.68
17. Huson Daniel H. , Scornavacca Celine . 2011. "A survey of combinatorial methods for phylogenetic networks". Genome Biology and Evolution Vol 3: 2335. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/gbe/evq077
18. Koonin Eugene V. ,, Makarova Kira S. ,, Aravind L. 2001. "Horizontal gene transfer in prokaryotes: quantification and classification". Annual Review Microbiology Vol 55: 709742. http://dx.doi.org/10.1146/annurev.micro.55.1.709
19. Kurpaska Maria . 2010. Chinese language(s). A look through the prism of “The Great Dictionary of Modern Chinese Dialects” .Berlin and New York: de Gruyter.
20. Xiǎofán . 李小凡. 2005. 〈"漢語方言分區方法再認識"〉 [Reevaluating the classification of the Chinese dialects]. 《方言》 4: 356–363.
21. List, Johann-Mattis, Moran, Steven. 2013. An open source toolkit for quantitative historical linguistics. In: Proceedings of the acl 2013 System Demonstrations (Sofia, 08/04–08/09/2013). Stroudsburg: Association for Computational Linguistics, 1318.
22. List, Johann-Mattis, Moran, Steven, Bouda, Peter, Dellert, Johannes, Rama, Taraka, Forkel, Robert. 2015: LingPy. Python library for automatic tasks in historical linguistics. Version 2.4.1-alpha (Uploaded on 2015-03-16). URL: . doi (Zenodo): .
23. List Johann-Mattis ,, Nelson-Sathi Shijulal ,, Geisler Hans ,, Martin William . 2014a. "Networks of lexical borrowing and lateral gene transfer in language and genome evolution". BioEssays Vol 36 (2): 141150. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/bies.201300096
24. List Johann-Mattis ,, Nelson-Sathi Shiju ,, Martin William ,, Geisler Hans . 2014b. "Using phylogenetic networks to model Chinese dialect history". Language Dynamics and Change Vol 4 (2): 222252. http://dx.doi.org/10.1163/22105832-00402008
25. List Johann-Mattis . 2014. Sequence comparison in historical linguistics . Düsseldorf: Düsseldorf University Press.
26. McMahon April ,, Heggarty Paul ,, McMahon Robert ,, Slaska Nathalia . 2005. "Swadesh sublists and the benefits of borrowing: An Andean case study". Transactions of the Philological Society Vol 103: 147170. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-968X.2005.00148.x
27. Mirkin Boris G. ,, Fenner Trevor I. ,, Galperin Michael Y. ,, Koonin Eugene V. 2003. "Algorithms for computing parsimonious evolutionary scenarios for genome evolution, the last universal common ancestor and dominance of horizontal gene transfer in the evolution of prokaryotes". bmc Evolutionary Biology Vol 3 (2).
28. Nakhleh Luay ,, Ringe Don ,, Warnow Tandy . 2005. "Perfect Phylogenetic Networks: A new methodology for reconstructing the evolutionary history of natural languages". Language Vol 81 (2): 382420. http://dx.doi.org/10.1353/lan.2005.0078
29. Nelson-Sathi Shijulal ,, List Johann-Mattis ,, Geisler Hans ,, Fangerau Heiner ,, Gray Russell D. ,, Martin William ,, Dagan Tal . 2011. "Networks uncover hidden lexical borrowing in Indo-European language evolution". Proceedings of the Royal Society London, Series B Vol 278 (1713): 17941803. http://dx.doi.org/10.1098/rspb.2010.1917
30. Norman Jerry . 1988. Chinese . Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
31. Norman Jerry ,. 2003. "The Chinese dialects. Phonology". In: Thurgood Graham , and LaPolla Randy (eds.), The Sino-Tibetan languages . London and New York: Routledge, 7283.
32. Norman Jerry , and Coblin Weldon S. 1995. "A new approach to Chinese historical linguistics". Journal of the American Oriental Society Vol 115 (4): 576584. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/604728
33. Nunn Charles L. 2011. The comparative approach in evolutionary anthropology and biology .Chicago and London: University of Chicago Press.
34. Nǎiróng Qián . 錢乃榮 . 2007. 《"上海方言"》 [The Shànghǎi dialect]. 上海:文匯出版社.
35. Sagart Laurent ,. 2001. "Vestiges of Archaic Chinese derivational affixes in modern Chinese dialects". In: H Chappell Hilary (ed.), Sinitic grammar. Synchronic and diachronic perspectives .Oxford: Oxford University Press, 123142.
36. Sagart Laurent . 2011. Classifying Chinese dialects/Sinitic languages on shared innovations. Paper, presented at the Séminaire Sino-Tibétain du crlao (Paris, 03/28/2011).
37. Saitou Naruya , and Nei Masatoshi . 1987. "The neighbor-joining method: A new method for reconstructing phylogenetic trees". Molecular Biology and Evolution Vol 4 (4): 406425.
38. Schleicher August . 1853. "Die ersten Spaltungen des indogermanischen Urvolkes". Allgemeine Monatsschrift für Wissenschaft und Literatur Vol 3: 786787.
39. Schmidt Johannes . 1872. Die Verwantschaftsverhältnisse der indogermanischen Sprachen . Weimar: Hermann Böhlau.
40. Sokal Robert R. ,, Michener Charles D. 1958. "A statistical method for evaluating systematic relationships". University of Kansas Scientific Bulletin Vol 28: 14091438.
41. Southworth Franklin C. 1964. "Family-tree diagrams". Language Vol 40 (4): 557565. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/411938
42. Starostin Sergej A. , 1995. "Old Chinese vocabulary: A historical perspective". In: Wang, William S.-Y. (ed.), The ancestry of the Chinese language. Berkeley: University of California Press, 225251.
43. Swadesh Morris . 1952. "Lexico-statistic dating of prehistoric ethnic contacts. With special reference to North American Indians and Eskimos". Proceedings of the American Philological Society Vol 96 (4): 452463.
44. Swadesh Morris . 1955. "Towards greater accuracy in lexicostatistic dating". International Journal of American Linguistics Vol 21 (2): 121137. http://dx.doi.org/10.1086/464321
45. Tadmor Uri ,. 2008. "Loanwords in the world’s languages". In: Haspelmath Martin ,, Tadmor Uri (eds.), Loanwords in the world’s languages . Berlin and New York: de Gruyter, 5575.
46. Wáng Hóngjūn . 王洪君. 2009. 〈"兼顧演變、推平和層次的漢語方言歷史關系模型"〉 [A historical relation model of Chinese dialects with multiple perspectives of evolution, level and stratum]. 《方言》3: 204–218.
47. Wang William S.-Y. 1997. "Languages or dialects?" The CUHK Journal of Humanities Vol 1: 5462.
48. Weinreich Uriel . 1953. Languages in contact . The Hague and Paris: Mouton.
49. Wurm S. A. ,, Liu Yongquan (eds.). 1987. 《"中國語言地圖集"》 [Language atlas of China]. Hong Kong: Longman Group.
50. Yan Margaret Mian . 2006. Introduction to Chinese dialectology .München: lincom Europa.
51. Yóu Rǔjiá . 游汝杰. 1992. 《"漢語方言學導論"》 [Chinese dialectology]. 上海:上海教育 出版社.
52. Zavjalova O. I. 1996. Диалекти китайского языка [The Chinese dialects]. Москва: Научная Книга.
53. Zhōngguó Shèhuì Kēxuéyuàn Yǔyán Yánjiūsuǒ. 中國社會科學院語言研究所 (ed.). 1955 [1981]. 《方言調查字表》 [List of characters for research on Chinese dialects]. 北京:商務印書館.
http://brill.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journals/10.1163/2405478x-00801002
Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1163/2405478x-00801002
2015-01-14
2017-08-22

Sign-in

Can't access your account?
  • Tools

  • Add to Favorites
  • Printable version
  • Email this page
  • Subscribe to ToC alert
  • Get permissions
  • Recommend to your library

    You must fill out fields marked with: *

    Librarian details
    Your details
    Why are you recommending this title?
    Select reason:
     
    Bulletin of Chinese Linguistics — Recommend this title to your library
  • Export citations
  • Key

  • Full access
  • Open Access
  • Partial/No accessInformation