Cookies Policy
X

This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies.

I accept this policy

Find out more here

A Hypothesis on the Origin of Old Chinese Pharyngealization (上古漢語咽化聲母來源的一個假設)

No metrics data to plot.
The attempt to load metrics for this article has failed.
The attempt to plot a graph for these metrics has failed.
The full text of this article is not currently available.

Brill’s MyBook program is exclusively available on BrillOnline Books and Journals. Students and scholars affiliated with an institution that has purchased a Brill E-Book on the BrillOnline platform automatically have access to the MyBook option for the title(s) acquired by the Library. Brill MyBook is a print-on-demand paperback copy which is sold at a favorably uniform low price.

Access this article

+ Tax (if applicable)
Add to Favorites
You must be logged in to use this functionality

It is proposed that OC pharyngealized onset consonants—that is, ‘type-A’ onset consonants—arose out of Proto-Sino-Tibetan plain consonants followed by geminate vowels separated by a pharyngeal fricative. When the first copy of the geminate vowel fell, the initial consonants formed clusters with the pharyngeal fricative, evolving into the OC pharyngealized consonants we reconstruct. In the Kuki-Chin branch of Tibeto-Burman, the pharyngeal fricative fell, and long vowels resulted. This proposal supposes a statistical correlation between Kuki-Chin long vowels and OC type-A words on the one hand, and between Kuki-Chin short vowels and OC type-B words on the other, as originally proposed by S. Starostin. A significant statistic bearing on forty-three probable Chinese-Kuki-Chin cognates supports this correlation. Thus reconstructed, a precursor language of Proto-Sino-Tibetan was aligned with Proto-Austronesian and Proto-Austroasiatic in exhibiting a surface constraint against monomoraic free words: by that constraint, the vowel of an underlying monosyllable was realized as a geminate with an intervening parasitic consonant such as a glottal stop or a pharyngeal fricative, while the vowels of a disyllable remained nongeminate. After reduction of disyllables to monosyllables, this process resulted in a pharyngealized vs. nonpharyngealized consonant distinction in OC.論文提出對上古漢語咽化聲母(即“A類聲母”)來源的一個假設,認為咽化聲母來源於原始漢藏語的無標記輔音,並且此無標記輔音後跟隨著由咽部擦音[ʕ]分割的雙胞元音(geminate vowels)。在雙胞元音的前半部分脫落後,輔音聲母跟咽部擦音形成了複輔音。新形成的複輔音最終演變為上古漢語的咽化聲母。而在藏緬語庫基-欽(Kuki-Chin)語支中,則是咽化擦音脫落,使雙胞元音變為長元音。本文解釋了漢語與庫基-欽語中一個統計學的顯著相關性:一方面,庫基-欽語含長元音的詞與上古漢語含A類聲母的詞呈顯著相關;另一方面,庫基-欽語含短元音的詞與上古漢語含B類聲母的詞呈顯著相關,正如斯塔羅金(S. Starostin)所說。據此構擬,我們提出原始漢藏語、原始南島語與原始南亞語中的一個共同限制(constraint):禁止在語流中出現單音拍(monomoraic)詞。在這一限制的作用下,單音節詞的單元音發生了雙胞化(germination),雙胞元音中間插入了喉塞音或咽部擦音之類的次聲輔音。而同時,雙音節詞的元音無變化。漢語經過雙音節詞的單音節化,就形成了無標記輔音與咽化輔音的音位對立。(This article is in English.)

Affiliations: 1: CNRS/INALCO laurent.sagart@gmail.com ; 2: 法國國家科學研究院 laurent.sagart@gmail.com ; 3: University of Michigan at Ann Arbor, wbaxter@umich.edu ; 4: 密歇根大學 wbaxter@umich.edu

10.1163/2405478X-00902002
/content/journals/10.1163/2405478x-00902002
dcterms_title,pub_keyword,dcterms_description,pub_author
10
5
Loading
Loading

Full text loading...

/content/journals/10.1163/2405478x-00902002
Loading

Data & Media loading...

1. Anderson Gregory D. S., Norman Zide,. 2002. "Issues in Proto-Munda and Proto-Austroasiatic nominal derivation: The Bimoraic constraint". In Papers from the 10th Annual Meeting of the Southeast Asian Linguistics Society , ed. Macken Marlys, 5574. Tempe: South East Asian Studies Monograph Series, Arizona State University.
2. Anderson Gregory S. 2004. "Advances in Proto-Munda reconstruction". Mon-Khmer Studies Vol 34:159184.
3. Baxter William H. 1992. A Handbook of Old Chinese Phonology . Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
4. Baxter William H., and Sagart Laurent. 2014. Old Chinese: A New Reconstruction . New York: Oxford University Press.
5. Blust Robert, and Trussell Steven. The Austronesian Comparative Dictionary (accessed 26 October 2016. http://www.trussel2.com/acd/).
6. Button Chris. 2011. Proto Northern Chin. stedt Monograph Series Number 10. Berkeley: University of California.
7. Karlgren Bernhard. 1954. "Compendium of phonetics in Ancient and Archaic Chinese". Bulletin of the Museum of Far Eastern Antiquities Vol 26:211367.
8. Li Fang-kuei [Lǐ Fāngguì 李方桂]. 1971. "Shànggǔ yīn yánjiū" 上古音研究. Tsing Hua Journal of Chinese Studies 9.1–2:1–61.
9. Norman Jerry. 1994. "Pharyngealization in Early Chinese". Journal of the American Oriental Society Vol 114:397408.
10. Langsrud Øyvind. Fisher’s Exact Test . http://www.langsrud.com/fisher.htm (accessed 26 October 2016).
11. Pulleyblank Edwin G. 1977–1978. "The final consonants of Old Chinese". Monumenta Serica Vol 33:180206.
12. Sagart Laurent. 1999. The Roots of Old Chinese . Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
13. Starostin Sergei A. 1989. Rekonstrukcija drevnekitajskoj fonologičeskoj sistemy [A reconstruction of the Old Chinese phonological system]. Moscow: Nauka, Glavnaya Redakcija Vostočnoj Literatury.
14. VanBik Kenneth. 2009. A Reconstructed Ancestor of the Kuki-Chin Languages. STEDT Monograph Series Number 8. Berkeley: University of California.
15. Wolff John U. 2007. "Petrified prefixes in the Austronesian languages". Studies in Philippine Languages and Cultures 15:2531.
16. Wolff John U. 2010. Proto-Austronesian Phonology with Glossary .Vol 2 vols. Ithaca: Cornell Southeast Asia Program Publications.
http://brill.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journals/10.1163/2405478x-00902002
Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1163/2405478x-00902002
2016-06-22
2017-11-17

Sign-in

Can't access your account?
  • Tools

  • Add to Favorites
  • Printable version
  • Email this page
  • Subscribe to ToC alert
  • Get permissions
  • Recommend to your library

    You must fill out fields marked with: *

    Librarian details
    Your details
    Why are you recommending this title?
    Select reason:
     
    Bulletin of Chinese Linguistics — Recommend this title to your library
  • Export citations
  • Key

  • Full access
  • Open Access
  • Partial/No accessInformation