Cookies Policy

This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies.

I accept this policy

Find out more here

Pseudonymity, Gnosis, and the Self in Gnostic Literature

No metrics data to plot.
The attempt to load metrics for this article has failed.
The attempt to plot a graph for these metrics has failed.
The full text of this article is not currently available.

Brill’s MyBook program is exclusively available on BrillOnline Books and Journals. Students and scholars affiliated with an institution that has purchased a Brill E-Book on the BrillOnline platform automatically have access to the MyBook option for the title(s) acquired by the Library. Brill MyBook is a print-on-demand paperback copy which is sold at a favorably uniform low price.

Access this article

+ Tax (if applicable)
Add to Favorites
You must be logged in to use this functionality

image of Gnosis: Journal of Gnostic Studies

Why did Sethian gnostic authors write pseudonymously? In addition to making a claim to authority, gnostic pseudepigraphy, exemplified by The Three Tablets of Seth, was multiple and performative, implying that the self is multiple—a manifestation of selfhood at different levels of a single reality—and that performing one’s self as multiple provides a path to higher knowledge of one’s self and thus of God. That is, gnostic pseudonymity stems from a distinctive understanding of the self and functions as a mystical practice that performs that understanding. The eschewal of pseudonymity in Valentinian literature reflects different conceptions of the self and of the path to gnosis.

Affiliations: 1: The Ohio State University


Full text loading...


Data & Media loading...

1. Aland Kurt"“The Problem of Anonymity and Pseudonymity in Christian Literature of the First Two Centuries”"Journal of Theological Studies1961Vol n.s. 123949
2. Brakke DavidThe Gnostics: Myth, Ritual, and Diversity in Early Christianity2010Cambridge, MAHarvard University Press
3. Brakke David"“Early Christian Lies and the Lying Liars Who Wrote Them: Bart Ehrman’s Forgery and Counterforgery”"Journal of Religion2016Vol 9637890
4. Claude PaulLes trois stèles de Seth: Hymne gnostique à la triade (NHC VII,5).1983QuébecLes Presses de l’Université LavalBibliothèque copte de Nag Hammadi, section “Textes” 8
5. Ehrman Bart D.Forgery and Counterforgery: The Use of Literary Deceit in Early Christian Polemics2012New YorkOxford University Press
6. Foucault Michel Faubion James D."“What Is an Author?”"Aesthetics, Method, and Epistemology1998New YorkThe New Press205222Essential Works of Foucault, 1954–1984, 2
7. Goehring James E. Pearson Birger A."“The Three Steles of Seth”"Nag Hammadi Codex VII.1996LeidenBrill371421Nag Hammadi and Manichaean Studies 30
8. King Karen L. Arnal William, et al"“ ‘What is an Author?’: Ancient Author-Function in The Apocryphon of John and The Apocalypse of John”"A Share in All Good Things: Essays in Honour of John S. KloppenborgForthcomingLeuvenPeeters
9. Layton BentleyThe Gnostic Scriptures1987Garden City, NYDoubleday
10. Mazur Zeke"“The Platonizing Sethian Gnostic Background to Plotinus’ Mysticism”"2010University of ChicagoPhD diss.ProQuest 756363550
11. Mazur Zeke"“Forbidden Knowledge: Cognitive Transgression and ‘Ascent Above Intellect’ in the Debate between Plotinus and the Gnostics”"Gnosis: Journal of Gnostic Studies2016Vol 186109
12. Russell David SymeThe Method and Message of Jewish Apocalyptic: 200 BC–AD 1001964LondonSCM
13. Schenke Hans-Martin Nagel Peter"“Das Sethianische System nach Nag-Hammadi-Handschriften”"Studia Coptica1974BerlinAkademie165173Berliner Byzantinistischer Arbeiten 45
14. Schenke Hans-Martin Layton Bentley"“The Phenomenon and Significance of Gnostic Sethianism”"The Rediscovery of Gnosticism: Proceedings of the International Conference on Gnosticism at Yale, New Haven, Connecticut, March 28–31, 19781981Vol Vol. 2: Sethian GnosticismLeidenBrill588616Studies in the History of Religions 41
15. Speyer WolfgangDie literarische Fälschung im heidnischen und christlichen Altertum1971MunichBeck
16. Stang Charles M.Apophasis and Pseudonymity in Dionysius the Areopagite: “No Longer I.”2012OxfordOxford University Press
17. Stang Charles M.Our Divine Double2016Cambridge, MAHarvard University Press
18. Thomassen Einar Painchaud Louis, Pasquier Anne"“Notes pour la délimitation d’un corpus valentinien à Nag Hammadi”"Les textes de Nag Hammadi et le problème de leur classification1995QuébecLes Presses de l’Université Laval243259Bibliothèque Copte de Nag Hammadi, Section “Études” 3
19. Turner John D. Turner John D., Majercik Ruth"“Ritual in Gnosticism”"Gnosticism and Later Platonism: Themes, Figures, and Texts2000AtlantaSociety of Biblical Literature83139sbl Symposium Series 12
20. Turner John D."“Sethian Gnosticism and the Platonic Tradition”"2001QuébecLes Presses de l’Université LavalBibliothèque Copte de Nag Hammadi, Section “Études” 6
21. Turner John D. Meyer Marvin"“The Three Steles of Seth”"The Nag Hammadi Scriptures: The International Edition2007New YorkHarperOne523536
22. Wekel Konrad"“ ‘Die drei Stelen des Seth’: Die fünfte Schrift aus Nag-Hammadi-Codex vii”"Theologische Literaturzeitung1975Vol 100571580

Article metrics loading...



Can't access your account?
  • Tools

  • Add to Favorites
  • Printable version
  • Email this page
  • Subscribe to ToC alert
  • Get permissions
  • Recommend to your library

    You must fill out fields marked with: *

    Librarian details
    Your details
    Why are you recommending this title?
    Select reason:
    Gnosis: Journal of Gnostic Studies — Recommend this title to your library
  • Export citations
  • Key

  • Full access
  • Open Access
  • Partial/No accessInformation