Cookies Policy
X

This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies.

I accept this policy

Find out more here

Open Access The 2015 Qualitative Election Study of Britain

No metrics data to plot.
The attempt to load metrics for this article has failed.
The attempt to plot a graph for these metrics has failed.
The full text of this article is not currently available.

Brill’s MyBook program is exclusively available on BrillOnline Books and Journals. Students and scholars affiliated with an institution that has purchased a Brill E-Book on the BrillOnline platform automatically have access to the MyBook option for the title(s) acquired by the Library. Brill MyBook is a print-on-demand paperback copy which is sold at a favorably uniform low price.

Add to Favorites
You must be logged in to use this functionality

Affiliations: 1: GESIS, Cologne, Germany, kristi.winters@gesis.org ; 2: University of Dundee, UK, e.carvalho@dundee.ac.uk ; 3: University of the West of England, Bristol, UK, thom.oliver@uwe.ac.uk

10.1163/24523666-01000007
/content/journals/10.1163/24523666-01000007
dcterms_title,pub_keyword,dcterms_description,pub_author
10
5
Loading

Related data set “Qualitative Election Study of Britain, 2015” with DOI http://dx.doi.org/10.5255/UKDA-SN-8117-1 in repository “UK Data Service”.The Qualitative Election Study of Britain (QESB) is the first (and only) qualitative longitudinal dataset to investigate political attitudes and voting behaviour over multiple elections and referendums in the United Kingdom. During the 2015 UK general election over 90 voters participated in 23 focus groups across England, Scotland, and Wales before and after polling day. These participants represented a range of political party supporters and independent voters, age groups, and economic backgrounds. They discussed a range of political issues including their vote choice in the election, their impressions of the major party leaders, why they would consider voting (or never voting) for a political party, and their expectations for the country moving forward. Special focus groups were also held around the three leaders’ debates. The 2015 QESB also brought back participants who had participated in the 2010 QESB focus groups and the 2014 Scottish referendum focus groups. The 2015 QESB has created a unique panel of participants whose political opinions can be tracked across multiple elections. The project also includes questions that were asked in prior election focus groups and has replicated, with some modifications, the research design of the previous wave of the study.

Loading

Full text loading...

/deliver/journals/24523666/24523666_01000007_text.html?itemId=/content/journals/10.1163/24523666-01000007&mimeType=html&fmt=ahah
/content/journals/10.1163/24523666-01000007
Loading

Data & Media loading...

http://brill.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journals/10.1163/24523666-01000007
Loading
Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1163/24523666-01000007
2017-08-21
2017-12-15
1. Bartle J. (2003). "Measuring party identification: An exploratory study with focus groups". Electoral Studies , Vol 22(2), 217237. [Crossref]
2. Campbell R., & Winters K. (2008). "Understanding men’s and women’s political interests: Evidence from a study of gendered political attitudes". Journal of Elections, Public Opinion and Parties , Vol 18(1), 5374. [Crossref]
3. Carvalho E., & Winters K. (2014). "The grounded theory method: Popular perceptions of party leaders during the 2010 British General Election". London: SAGE Publications. doi: 10.4135/978144627305013510259
4. Carvalho E., & Winters K. (2015). "‘I went with what I always do…’: A qualitative analysis of the effect of ‘Cleggmania’ and vote choice in the 2010 British General Election". Parliamentary Affairs , Vol 68(2), 423446. [Crossref]
5. Denver D. (2005). "‘Valence politics’: How Britain votes now". British Journal of Politics and International Relations , Vol 7, 292299. [Crossref]
6. Guba E. (1981). "eric/ectj annual review paper: Criteria for assessing the trustworthiness of naturalistic inquiries". Educational Communication and Technology , Vol 29(2), 7591.
7. Guba E., & Lincoln Y., (1994). "Competing paradigms in qualitative research". In Denzin N., & Lincoln Y. (eds.) Handbook of qualitative research (pp. 10517). Thousand Oaks: Sage.
8. Herrnson P. (1995). "Replication, verification, secondary analysis, and data collection in political science’". ps: Political Science and Politics , Vol 28(3), 452455. [Crossref]
9. Lucas J.,, Morrell K., & Posard M.. (2013). "Considerations on the “replication problem” in Sociology". The American Sociologist , Vol 44, 217232. [Crossref]
10. White C.,, Ritchie J.,, & Devine F. (1999). "Voter volatility: A qualitative study of voting behaviour at the 1997 General Election". London, : Social and Community Planning Research.
11. Winters K. (2010). Public version: first, second and third Leaders Debates transcripts (Qualitative Election Study of Britain). Retrieved from http://qesb.info
12. Winters K., & Campbell R., (2007). "Hearts or minds? Men, women and candidate evaluations in the 2005 General Election". In Wring D.,, Green J.,, & Mortimore R. (eds.), Political Communication: The General Election Campaign of 2005 (pp. 184202). Basingstoke, UK: Palgrave Macmillan.
13. Winters K., & Carvalho E. (2013). "2010 British General Election leader evaluations: A case study using focus group data". The Qualitative Report , Vol 18(45), 121.
14. Winters K., & Carvalho E. (2014). The qualitative election study of Britain: Qualitative research using focus groups . London: SAGE Publications Ltd. doi: 10.4135/978144627305013509945
15. Winters K,, Carvalho E,. & Oliver T. (2016). "‘Designing qualitative research for replication and secondary analysis: A case study using the Qualitative Election Study of Britain’, From Transparency to Replication in Qualitative Inference: Guidelines and Tools research workshop. University of Essex, Colchester, 23–24 May 2016".
Submit comment
Close
Comment moderation successfully completed

Sign-in

Can't access your account?
  • Key

  • Full access
  • Open Access
  • Partial/No accessInformation