Cookies Policy

This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies.

I accept this policy

Find out more here

The Method of Aristotle’s Inquiry on φαντασία in De Anima III 3

No metrics data to plot.
The attempt to load metrics for this article has failed.
The attempt to plot a graph for these metrics has failed.
The full text of this article is not currently available.

Brill’s MyBook program is exclusively available on BrillOnline Books and Journals. Students and scholars affiliated with an institution that has purchased a Brill E-Book on the BrillOnline platform automatically have access to the MyBook option for the title(s) acquired by the Library. Brill MyBook is a print-on-demand paperback copy which is sold at a favorably uniform low price.

Access this article

+ Tax (if applicable)
Add to Favorites
You must be logged in to use this functionality

image of Méthexis

This paper concerns the Aristotelian inquiry on φαντασία’ in De Anima III 3. I argue for a systematic interpretation of the chapter, according to which III 3 neatly instantiates what David Charles has called the Three Stage View on scientific inquiry. The first stage establishes the meaning of the term φαντασία so it provides a nominal definition of the object, the second stage dialectically confirms the existence of φαντασία as something different from other already known cognitive powers (perception, thought), the third stage posits a hypothetical essence (real definition), then it tests its power of enabling us to derive from such an essence those manifest and apparent features of φαντασία, that had been previously individuated. On the basis of such reading, some general suggestions on the status and role of φαντασία are also proposed, on the basis of which we can take the definition of III 3 to be consistent with any other explanatory uses of φαντασία in the corpus.

Affiliations: 1: Università degli Studi di Sassari, Italy,


Full text loading...


Data & Media loading...

1. Armstrong D.M., A Materialist Theory of Mind , London, Routledge, 1968.
2. Birondo N., ‘"Aristotle on Illusory Perception: Phantasia without Phantasma"’, Ancient Philosophy, Vol 21, 2001, 5771. [Crossref]
3. Bonitz H., Index Aristotelicus , Berlin 1870.
4. Cashdollar S., ‘"Aristotle’s Account of Incidental Perception"’, Phronesis , Vol xviii, 1973, 156175.
5. Caston V., ‘"Why Aristotle Needs Imagination’", Phronesis , Vol xxxxi, 1996, 2055.
6. Charles D., Aristotle on Meaning and Essence , Oxford University Press, Oxford, 2002.
7. Dretske F.D., Naturalizing the Mind , Cambridge Mass., Cambridge University Press, 1995.
8. Feola G., Phàntasma e Phantasìa. Illusione ed apparenza sensibile nel De Anima di Aristotele , Loffredo, Napoli, 2012.
9. Frede D.,, ‘"The Cognitive Role of Phantasia in Aristotle"’, in Nussbaum M.,, Rorty A., Essays in Aristotle’s De Anima, Clarendon Press, Oxford, 1995, 279296.
10. Freudenthal J., Über den Begriff des Wortes Φαντασία bei Aristoteles , Gottingen, Hut, 1863.
11. Gregoric P., Aristotle on Common Sense , Oxford, Oxford University Press, 2007.
12. Hamlyn D.,, Aristotle, De Anima Book ii and iii (with passages from Book i) , translated with introduction and notes by Hamlyn D.W., Oxford, Clarendon Press, 1968.
13. Hicks R.D.,, Aristotle, De Anima , with translation, introduction and notes by Hicks R.D., Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1923.
14. Irwin Th., Aristotle’s First Principles, Oxford University Press, Oxford, 1988.
15. Irwin Th.,, ‘Review of Charles D.’ "Aristotle on Meaning and Essence"’, International Philosophical QuarterlyVol 44 (1), 2004, 95105. [Crossref]
16. Johansen T.K., The Powers of Aristotle’s Soul , Oxford University Press, Oxford, 2012.
17. Labarrière J.L., ‘"Imagination humaine et imagination animale chez Aristote"’, Phronesis , Vol 29/1, 1984, 1749.
18. Labarrière J.L.,, ‘De la phronesis animale’, in Devereux D.,, Pellegrin P., Biologie, logique et métaphysique chez Aristote , Centre national de la recherche scientifique, Paris 1990, 405 428.
19. Modrak D., ‘"Φαντασία Reconsidered"’, Archiv für Geschichte der Philosophie , Vol 66, 1986, 4769.
20. Modrak D., Aristotle: The Power of Perception , University of Chicago Press, Chicago, 1987.
21. Moss J., Aristotle on the Apparent Good. Perception, Phantasia, Thought, Desire , Oxford University Press, Oxford, 2012.
22. Nussbaum M.,, Aristotle. De Motu Animalium , text with translation, commentary and interpretive essays by Nussbaum M.C., Princeton University Press, Princeton, 1978.
23. Nussbaum M.,, ‘"Saving Aristotle’s Appearances"’, in Schofield M.,, Nussbaum M.C., Lingua e logos , Cambridge University Press, Cambridge Mass., 1982, 267294.
24. Osborne C., ‘"Aristotle on the Fantastic Abilities of Animals in De Animaiii 3"’, Oxford Studies in Ancient Philosophy , Vol 19, 2000, 253285.
25. Owen G.E.L., Tιθέναι τὰ φαινόμενα, in Aristote et les problemes de méthode , Publications Universitaires de Louvain, Louvain, 1961, 83103.
26. Pitcher G., A Theory of Perception , Princeton University Press, Princeton, 1970.
27. Polansky R., Aristotle’s De Anima , Cambridge University Press, Cambridge-New York, 2007.
28. Rapp Ch.,, ‘"Intentionalität una Phantasia bei Aristoteles"’, in Perler D., Ancient and Medieval Theories of Intentionality , Brill, Leiden, 2001, 6395.
29. Ross D.,, Aristotle, De Anima , edited with introduction and commentary by Ross D., Oxford, Clarendon Press, 1961.
30. Scheiter K., ‘"Images, Appearance and Phantasia in Aristotle"’, Phronesis , Vol 57, 2012, 251278.
31. Schofield M.,, ‘Aristotle on the Imagination’, in Lloyd G.,, Owen G.E.L., Aristotle on Mind and the Senses. Proceedings of the Seventh Symposium Aristotelicum , Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1978, 99141.
32. Stephanou Y.,, ‘Review of Charles D.’ "Aristotle on Meaning and Essence", Mind , Vol 444 (111), 2002, 841847.
33. Turnbull K., ‘"Aristotle on Imagination"’, Ancient Philosophy , Vol 14 (2), 1994, 319334.
34. Tye M., "Ten Problems of Consciousness. A Representational Theory of the Phenomenal Mind", mit Press, Cambridge Mass., 1995.
35. Wieland W., Die Aristotelische Physik , Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht, Göttingen 1970.
36. Yourdin J.,, ‘Aristotelian Imagination and the Explanation of Behavior’, in Van Riel G.,, Destree P., Ancient Perspectives on Aristotle’s De Anima, Leuven University Press, Leuven, 2009.

Article metrics loading...



Can't access your account?
  • Tools

  • Add to Favorites
  • Printable version
  • Email this page
  • Subscribe to ToC alert
  • Get permissions
  • Recommend to your library

    You must fill out fields marked with: *

    Librarian details
    Your details
    Why are you recommending this title?
    Select reason:
    Méthexis — Recommend this title to your library
  • Export citations
  • Key

  • Full access
  • Open Access
  • Partial/No accessInformation