Cookies Policy
X

This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies.

I accept this policy

Find out more here

Light, temperature, and substrate effects on the germination of three Bromus species in comparison with their abundance in the field

No metrics data to plot.
The attempt to load metrics for this article has failed.
The attempt to plot a graph for these metrics has failed.
The full text of this article is not currently available.

Brill’s MyBook program is exclusively available on BrillOnline Books and Journals. Students and scholars affiliated with an institution that has purchased a Brill E-Book on the BrillOnline platform automatically have access to the MyBook option for the title(s) acquired by the Library. Brill MyBook is a print-on-demand paperback copy which is sold at a favorably uniform low price.

Access this article

+ Tax (if applicable)
Add to Favorites
You must be logged in to use this functionality

image of Israel Journal of Plant Sciences

The landscape in the northern Negev Desert of Israel consists of small patches of dwarf shrubs separated by a matrix of biological soil crusts. Bromus species, important winter annuals, are very common in shrub patches and in places where the soil crust has been disturbed. Therefore, patch properties such as substrate and microclimate may have important effects on the size of the seed bank, germination, and seedling establishment of these species. We studied germination under laboratory conditions in light and darkness, at different temperatures, and on various substrates collected from the Sayeret Shaked Long Term Ecological Research (LTER) station. We compared the experimental results with findings of the distribution of abundance of the species in the field. Germination in all three Bromus species responded to light and temperature. The seeds germinated faster in darkness below 20 °C, but more rapidly in the light at 20 °C. Different constant temperatures not only influenced the rate of germination, but also the start and the time to achieve 75% and 100% germination. The differences in the occurrence of B. alopecuroides and B. fasciculatus in the Sayeret Shaked LTER station may not depend on the substrate. The highest germination (96-100%), with no significant differences, occurred on all substrates except for sterile organic matter, which resulted in 64- 66% germination. Comparing these results with the findings of germination abundance in the field, the differentiating factor may be related to the number of seeds that arrive and remain in the different patch types, which in turn depends either on the numbers of seeds produced per plant or on their dispersability or protection against removal. Nevertheless, B. rubens did show significant differences between the two patch types.

Affiliations: 1: Desertification and Restoration Ecology Research Center, Wyler Department for Drylands Agriculture, Jacob Blaustein Institute of Desert Research, and, Department of Life Sciences, Ben-Gurion University of the Negev ; 2: Unit for Ecophysiology and Introduction of, Desert Plants, Wyler Department for Drylands Agriculture, Jacob Blaustein Institute of Desert Research, and, Department of Life Sciences, Ben-Gurion University of the Negev

10.1560/0WQ1-WH6H-9RJD-LNE3
/content/journals/10.1560/0wq1-wh6h-9rjd-lne3
dcterms_title,pub_keyword,dcterms_description,pub_author
10
5
Loading
Loading

Full text loading...

/content/journals/10.1560/0wq1-wh6h-9rjd-lne3
Loading

Data & Media loading...

1. Zaady, E., Groffman, P., Shachak, M. 1996. Litter as a regulator of nitrogen and carbon dynamics in macrophytic patches in Negev desert soils. Soil Biol. Biochem. 28: 39- 46.
2. West, N.E. 1990. Structure and function of crust soil crusts in wildland ecosystems of arid to semi-arid regions. Adv. Ecol. Res. 20: 179-223.
3. Wilby, A., Shachak, M. 2000. Harvester ant response to spatial and temporal heterogeneity in seed availability: pattern in the process of granivory. Oecologia 125: 495- 503.
4. Zaady, E., Gutterman,Y., Boeken, B. 1997. The germination of mucilaginous seeds of Plantago coronopus, Reboudia pinnata and Carrichtera annua on cyanobacterial soil crust from the Negev Desert. Plant Soil 190: 247-252.
5. Zaady, E., Kuhn, U., Wilske, B., Sandoval-Soto, L., Kesselmeier, J. 2000. Patterns of CO exchange in biological soil crusts of successional age. Soil Biol. Biochem. 32: 959-966.
6. Sokal, R.R., Rohlf, F.J. 1995. Biometry, 3rd ed. Freeman, San Francisco.
7. Boeken, B., Shachak, M. 1994. Desert plant communities in human-made patches--implications for management. Ecol. Appl. 4: 702-716.
8. Boeken, B., Shachak, M. 1998a. The dynamics of abundance and incidence of annual plant species during colonization in a desert. Ecography 21: 63-73.
9. Boeken, B., Shachak, M. 1998b. Colonization by annual plants of an experimentally altered desert landscape: source-sink relationships. J. Ecol. 86: 804-814.
10. Bruins, H.J. 1990. The impact of man and climate on the central Negev and northeastern Sinai deserts during the Late Holocene. In: Bottema, S., Entjes-Nieborg, G., Van Zeist, W., eds. Man's role in the shaping of the Eastern Mediterranean landscape. Balkema, Rotterdam. pp. 87-99.
11. Danin, A. 1996. Plants of desert dunes. Adaptations of desert organisms. Springer, Berlin.
12. Eldridge, D.J. 1993. Cryptogams cover and soil surface condition: effects on hydrology on a semi-arid woodland soil. Arid Soil Res. Rehab. 7: 203-217.
13. Eldridge, D.J., Greene, R.S.B. 1994. Microbiotic soil crusts: A review of their roles in soil and ecological processes in the rangelands of Austeralia. Aust. J. Soil Research 32(3): 389-415.
14. Evenari, M., Shanan, L. Tadmor, N. 1982. The Negev. The challenge of a desert, 2nd ed. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA.
15. Zaady, E., Shachak, M. 1994. Microphytic soil crust and ecosystem leakage in the Negev desert. Am. J. Bot. 81: 109.
16. Stern, A., Gradus, Y., Meir, A., Krakover, S., Tsoar, H. 1986. Atlas of the Negev. Ben-Gurion University of the Negev, Beer Sheva.
17. Feinbrun-Dothan, N., Danin, A. 1991. Analytical flora of Eretz-Israel. Cana, Jerusalem.
18. Gosz, J.R., French, C., Sprott, P. 2000. The international Long Term Ecological Research network. Department of Biology, University of New Mexico, Albuquerque, NM.
19. Gutterman, Y. 1993. Seed germination in desert plants. Springer-Verlag, Berlin.
20. Gutterman, Y. 2000. Environmental factors and survival strategies of annual plant species in the Negev Desert, Israel. Plant Spec. Biol. 15: 113-125.
21. Gutterman, Y. 2001. Regeneration of plants in arid ecosystems resulting from patch disturbance. Geobotany 27. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht. 260 pp.
22. Gutterman, Y. 2002a. Survival strategies of annual desert plants. Adaptations of desert organisms. Springer, Berlin.
23. Gutterman, Y. 2002b. Mini review: survival adaptations and strategies of annuals occurring in the Judean and Negev deserts of Israel. Isr. J. Plant Sci. 50: 165-175.
24. Mayer, A.M., Poljakoff-Mayber, A. 1982. The germination of seeds, 3rd ed. Pergamon Press, Exeter, UK.
25. Shachak, M., Sachs, M., Moshe, I. 1998. Ecosystem management of desertified shrublands in Israel. Ecosystems 1: 475-483.
http://brill.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journals/10.1560/0wq1-wh6h-9rjd-lne3
Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1560/0wq1-wh6h-9rjd-lne3
2003-05-13
2018-06-19

Sign-in

Can't access your account?
  • Tools

  • Add to Favorites
  • Printable version
  • Email this page
  • Subscribe to ToC alert
  • Get permissions
  • Recommend to your library

    You must fill out fields marked with: *

    Librarian details
    Your details
    Why are you recommending this title?
    Select reason:
     
    Israel Journal of Plant Sciences — Recommend this title to your library
  • Export citations
  • Key

  • Full access
  • Open Access
  • Partial/No accessInformation