Cookies Policy
X

This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies.

I accept this policy

Find out more here

Considerations in establishing a health risk management system for effluent irrigation in modern agriculture

No metrics data to plot.
The attempt to load metrics for this article has failed.
The attempt to plot a graph for these metrics has failed.
The full text of this article is not currently available.

Brill’s MyBook program is exclusively available on BrillOnline Books and Journals. Students and scholars affiliated with an institution that has purchased a Brill E-Book on the BrillOnline platform automatically have access to the MyBook option for the title(s) acquired by the Library. Brill MyBook is a print-on-demand paperback copy which is sold at a favorably uniform low price.

Access this article

+ Tax (if applicable)
Add to Favorites
You must be logged in to use this functionality

image of Israel Journal of Plant Sciences

Treated sewage effluent is a valuable and reliable agricultural irrigation resource in areas of low or unpredictable rainfall. Its importance is likely to grow under the influence of global climate change. The use of this resource is not, however, without health risk which is difficult to estimate using data from standard microbial and physicochemical monitoring alone. A health risk management system enables risk reduction through hazard identification, risk characterisation and analysis, strategy development and implementation, intervention assessment and risk communication. In this process data from both risk assessment and routine technological monitoring are integrated to yield synergies. In addition to meaningful information is a need for intersectoral collaboration in making the right decisions. This can be achieved through the establishment of a multidisciplinary risk management team with members drawn from communities of practice. Examples from the University of Western Sydney (UWS) experience are used to support the suggestions made.

Affiliations: 1: School of Science and Health, University of Western Sydney

10.1560/IJPS.59.2-4.125
/content/journals/10.1560/ijps.59.2-4.125
dcterms_title,pub_keyword,dcterms_description,pub_author
10
5
Loading
Loading

Full text loading...

/content/journals/10.1560/ijps.59.2-4.125
Loading

Data & Media loading...

1. Aiken, J. T., Derry, C., Attwater, R. 2010. Impact of recycled water quality on a Sydney irrigation scheme. Water 37: 86-90.
2. ANZECC/ARMCANZ (Australian and New Zealand Environment and Conservation Council/Agriculture and Resource Management Council of Australia and New Zealand). 2000. Australian and New Zealand guidelines for fresh and marine water quality book 4. ANZECC, Canberra, Australia.
3. APHA (American Public Health Association). 2005. Standard methods for the examination of water and wastewater. APHA, Washington, DC.
4. Asano, T. 2002. The 2001 Stockholm Water Prize Laureate Lecture. Water Sci. Technol. 45: 23-33.
5. Attwater, R., Derry, C. 2005. Engaging communities of practice for risk communication in the Hawkesbury Water Recycling Scheme. Action Res. 3: 193-209.
6. Attwater, R., Aiken, J., Beveridge, G., Booth, C. A., Derry, C., Shams, R., Stewart, J. 2006. An adaptive systems toolkit for managing the Hawkesbury water recycling scheme. Desalination 188: 21-30.
7. Booth, C. A., Attwater, R., Derry, C., Simmons, B. 2003. The Hawkesbury water reuse scheme. Water 5: 28-30.
8. Danon-Schaffer, M. N. 2001. Walkerton's contaminated water supply system: a forensic approach to identifying the source. Environ. Forensics 2: 197-200.
9. Derry, C. 2003. Risk assessment of wastewater reuse on Hawkesbury Campus, University of Western Sydney Phase 1: hazard identification, risk analysis, unsafe practices, priority actions, general safeguards and controls. ICEM Research Group, Sydney, Australia.
10. Derry, C., Attwater, R. 2006. Risk perception and communication relating to effluent irrigation on a university campus. Water 33: 57-62.
11. Derry, C., Attwater, R., Booth, S. 2006. Rapid health-risk assessment of effluent irrigation on an Australian university campus. Int. J. Hyg. Environ. Health 209: 159-171.
12. Ensink, J. H. J., van der Hoek, W., Amerasinghe, F. P. 2006. Giardia duodenalis infection and wastewater irrigation in Pakistan. Trans. R. Soc. Trop. Med. Hyg. 100: 538-542.
13. Geist, M. R. 2010. Using the Delphi method to engage stakeholders: a comparison of two studies. Eval. Prog. Plann. 33: 147-154.
14. Gray, N. F. 2005. Pathogens and their removal. Water technology, an introduction for environmental scientists and engineers. Elsevier Butterworth-Heinemann, Oxford, UK.
15. Hespanhol, I., Prost, A. M. E. 1994. WHO guidelines and national standards for reuse and water quality. Water Res. 28: 119-124.
16. Horan, N. J. 2003. Faecal indicator organisms. In: Mara, D., Horan, N. Handbook of water and wastewater microbiology. Academic Press, San Diego, pp. 105-112.
17. Lazarova, V., Bahri, A. 2004. Water reuse for irrigation: agriculture, lands, and turf grass. CRC Press, New York.
18. Loff, B., Fairley, C. 1998. Sydney residents told to boil their water. The Lancet 352: 465.
19. McClellan, P. 1998. Sydney water inquiry. Sydney Water Inquiry Secretariat, Sydney, Australia.
20. Meyer, M. 2002. Bureaucracy and bureaucratization. In: Smelser, N. J., Baltes, P. B., ed. International encyclopaedia of the social and behavioural sciences. Elsevier, Amsterdam.
21. O'Connor, D. R. 2002. Report of the Walkerton inquiry. Queen's Printer for Ontario, Ontario, Canada.
22. Omenn Commission (The Presidential/Congressional Commission on risk assessment and risk management). 1997. A framework for environmental health risk management. Government Printing Office, Washington, DC.
23. Shuval, H., Fattal, B. 2003. Control of pathogenic microorganisms in wastewater recycling and reuse in agriculture. In: Mara, D., Horan, N. J., eds. Handbook of water and wastewater microbiology. Academic Press, San Diego, pp. 241-262.
24. Srinivasan, J. T., Reddy, R. 2009. Impact of irrigation water quality on human health: a case study in India. Ecol. Econ., 68: 2800-2807.
25. Toze, S. 2006a. Water and health risks—real and perceived. Desalination 187: 41-51.
26. Toze, S. 2006b. Reuse of effluent water—benefits and risks. Agric. Water Manage. 80: 147-159.
27. WHO (World Health Organization). 1989. Health guidelines for the use of waste water in agriculture and aquaculture. Report of the WHO Scientific Group, TR778, as amended. World Health Organization, Geneva, Switzerland.
28. Wilkes, G., Edge, T., Gannon, V., Jokinen, C., Lyautey, E., Medeiros, D., Neumann, N., Ruecker, N., Topp, E., Lapen, D. R. 2009. Seasonal relationships among indicator bacteria, pathogenic bacteria, Cryptosporidium oocysts, Giardia cysts, and hydrological indices for surface waters within an agricultural landscape. Water Res. 43: 2209-2223.
http://brill.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journals/10.1560/ijps.59.2-4.125
Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1560/ijps.59.2-4.125
2011-05-18
2018-09-23

Sign-in

Can't access your account?
  • Tools

  • Add to Favorites
  • Printable version
  • Email this page
  • Subscribe to ToC alert
  • Get permissions
  • Recommend to your library

    You must fill out fields marked with: *

    Librarian details
    Your details
    Why are you recommending this title?
    Select reason:
     
    Israel Journal of Plant Sciences — Recommend this title to your library
  • Export citations
  • Key

  • Full access
  • Open Access
  • Partial/No accessInformation