Cookies Policy
X

This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies.

I accept this policy

Find out more here

Review: Irrigation of floricultural and nursery crops with saline wastewaters

No metrics data to plot.
The attempt to load metrics for this article has failed.
The attempt to plot a graph for these metrics has failed.
The full text of this article is not currently available.

Brill’s MyBook program is exclusively available on BrillOnline Books and Journals. Students and scholars affiliated with an institution that has purchased a Brill E-Book on the BrillOnline platform automatically have access to the MyBook option for the title(s) acquired by the Library. Brill MyBook is a print-on-demand paperback copy which is sold at a favorably uniform low price.

Access this article

+ Tax (if applicable)
Add to Favorites
You must be logged in to use this functionality

image of Israel Journal of Plant Sciences

Water security has become a major concern throughout the western United States and other arid and semiarid regions worldwide. Uncertainties concerning the allocation and dependability of good quality water have led to increased interest in the use of alternative, non-potable waters for irrigated agriculture. Treated urban effluents, runoff from greenhouse operations, agricultural drainage waters, or naturally-occurring low quality waters are abundant in many arid or semiarid areas. Reuse of these waters for production of floral and nursery crops requires an understanding of plant response to the stress imposed by inorganic salts in the irrigation waters. Such an understanding will allow growers to match specific crops to available water qualities, and further, to institute management practices to sustain quality of the marketable product. This report reviews the results of studies conducted at the U.S. Salinity Laboratory, Riverside, CA, on the effect of saline irrigation waters on yield and quality of ten species of herbaceous cut flower crops. Test crops were: snapdragon (Antirrhinum majus L.), celosia (Celosia argentea var. cristata (L.) Kuntz), sunflower (Helianthus annuus (L.)), statice (Limonium perezii (Snapf) F.T. Hubb) and L. sinuatum (L.) Mill), stock (Matthiola incana (L.) R. Br.), ranunculus (Ranunculus asiatica L.), marigold (Tagetes erecta L. and T. patula L.), and zinnia (Zinnia elegans Jacq.). Treatment waters were prepared to simulate the inorganic chemistry of recyclable waters available in different areas of California. Guidelines are presented for reuse of degraded water for production of commercially important cut flower crops, and also for selection of crops suitable for salt-affected landscape sites.

Affiliations: 1: Water Reuse and Remediation Management Unit, U.S. Salinity Laboratory

10.1560/IJPS.59.2-4.187
/content/journals/10.1560/ijps.59.2-4.187
dcterms_title,pub_keyword,dcterms_description,pub_author
10
5
Loading
Loading

Full text loading...

/content/journals/10.1560/ijps.59.2-4.187
Loading

Data & Media loading...

1. Armitage, A. M. 1993. Specialty cut flowers. Varsity Press/Timber Press, Portland, OR, 372 pp.
2. Arnold, M. A., Lesikar, B. J., McDonald, G. V., Bryan, D. L., Gross, A. 2003. Irrigation landscape bedding plants and cut flowers with recycled nursery runoff and constructed werland treated water. J. Environ. Hortic. 21: 89-98.
3. Aronson, J. A. 1989. HALOPH. A data base of salt tolerant plants of the world. Office of Arid Land Studies, Univ. Arizona, Tucson.
4. ASCFG. Association of Specialty Cut Flowers Growers. 2002. Cut flowers of the year. www.ascfg.org
5. Ayers, R. S., Westcot, D. W. 1985. Water Quality for Agriculture. F. A. O. Irrigation and drainage Paper 29 Rev. 1. F. A. O. UN, Rome. 174 pp.
6. Ball, V. 1998. Ball Redbook. 16th Edition. Ball Publishing, Batavia, IL.
7. Bernstein, N., Luria, G., Bruner, M., Nishri, Y., Dori. I., Matan, E., Joffe, M. 2008. Development of "stem-topple" disorder in Ranunculus asiaticus is related to localised disturbances in tissue calcium levels. J. Hortic. Sci. Biotechnol. 83: 525-531.
8. California Department of Water Resources. 2009. Matching water quality to use, Vol. 2. California Water Plan Update, Chapter 16.
9. Carter, C. T., Grieve, C. M. 2008. Mineral nutrition, growth, and germination of Antirrhinum majus L. (snapdragon) when produced under increasingly saline conditions. HortScience 43: 710-718.
10. Carter, C. T., Grieve, C. M. 2009. Growth and salinity tolerance of Zinnia elegans when irrigated with wastewaters from two distinct growing regions in California. HortScience 44: 1083.
11. Carter, C. T., Grieve, C. M., Poss. J. A. 2005a. Salinity effects on emergence, survival and ion accumulation of Limonium perezii. J. Plant Nutr. 28: 1243-1257.
12. Carter, C. T., Grieve, C. M., Poss, J. A., Suarez, D. L. 2005b. Production and ion uptake of Celosia argentea irrigated with saline wastewaters. Sci. Hortic. 106: 381-394.
13. Costello. L. R., Perry, E. J., Matheny, N. P., Henry, J. M., Geisel, P. M. 2003. Abiotic disorders of landscape plants. A diagnostic guide. University of California Agriculture and Natural Resources. Pub. 3420. 242 pp.
14. Cuartero, J., Fernández-Muñoz, F. 1999. Tomato and salinity. Sci. Hortic. 78: 83-125.
15. Devitt, D. A., Morris, R. L. 1987. Morphological response of flowering annuals to salinity. J. Am. Soc. Hortic. Sci. 112: 951-955.
16. Dole, J. M., Wilkins, H. F. 1999. Floriculture—principles and species. Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River, NJ.
17. Epstein, E., Bloom, A. J. 2005. Mineral nutrition of plants: principles and perspectives. 2nd Edition. Sinauer Associates, Inc., Sunderland, MA.
18. Flowers, T. J., Hajibagheri, M. A., Clipson, N. J. 1986. Halophytes. Quart. Rev. Biol. 61: 313-337.
19. Friedman, H., Bernstein, N., Bruner, M., Rot, I., Ben-Noon, Z., Zuriel, A., Zuriel, R., Finkelstein, S., Umiel, N., Hagiladi, A. 2007. Application of secondary-treated effluents for cultivation of sunflower (Helianthus annuus L.) and celosia (Celosia argentea L.) as cut flowers. Sci. Hortic. 115: 62-69.
20. Gagneul, D., Aïnouche, A., Duhazé, C., Lugan, R., Larher, F. R., Bouchereau, A. 2007. A reassessment of the function of the so-called compatible solutes in the halophytic Plumbaginaceae Limonium latifoliun. Plant Phys. 144: 1598-1611.
21. Gilman, E. F. 2007. Antirrhinum majus, snapdragon. Univ. Florida. Int. Food Agric. Sci. Extension FPS-44. 3 pp.
22. Grieve, C. M., Poss, J. A. 2010. Response of ornamental sunflower cultivars ‘Sunbeam’ and ‘Moonbright’ to irrigation with saline wastewaters. J. Plant Nutr. In Press.
23. Grieve, C. M., Poss, J. A., Grattan, S. R., Shouse, P. J., Lieth, J. H., Zeng, L. 2005. Production and mineral nutrition of Limonium species irrigated with saline wastewaters. HortScience 40: 654-658.
24. Grieve, C. M., Poss, J. A., Amrhein, C. 2006. Response of Matthiola incana to irrigation with saline wastewaters. HortScience 41: 119-123.
25. Grieve, C. M., Wu, S., Grattan, S. R., Harivandi, A. 2007. Tolerance of plants to salinity and to specific ions. In: Tanji, K., ed. Managing salinity of recycled water for landscape irrigation: a comprehensive literature review. National Water Research Institute. Chapter 5, pp. V1-V60. CD-ROM available: trusso@nwri-usa.org. trusso@nwri-usa.org
26. Grieve, C. M., Poss, J. A., Carter, C. T., Shouse, P. J. 2008. Modeling growth of Matthiola incana in response to saline wastewaters differing in nitrogen level. HortScience 1787-1793.
27. Healy, W. 1997. Stock as a cut flower. In: Ball, V., ed. Ball Redbook. 16th edition. Ball Publishing. Batavia, IL.
28. Hoffman, G. J. 1981. Alleviating salinity stress. In: Arkin, G. F., Taylor, H. M., eds. Modifying the root environment to reduce crop stress. Am. Soc. Agric. Eng. Monograph 4. ASAE, St. Joseph, MI. Chapter 9.
29. Klotz, E., Lawton, H., Hall, J., 1989. A history of citrus in the Riverside area. Riverside Museum Press. Riverside, CA.
30. Lee, M. K., van Iersel, M. K. 2008. Sodium chloride effects on the growth, morphology, and physiology of chrysanthemum (Chrysanthemum x morifolium). HortScience 43: 1888-1891.
31. Liu, X., Grieve, C. M. 2009. Accumulation of chiro-inositol and other non-structural carbohydrates in Limonium species in response to saline irrigation waters. J. Am. Soc. Hortic. Sci. 134: 329-336.
32. Lunt, O. R., Kofranek, A. M., Hart, S. A. 1954. Tolerance of six stock (Matthiola incana) varieties to saline conditions. Proc. Am. Soc. Hortic. Sci. 64: 431-436.
33. Maas, E. V. 1986. Salt tolerance of plants. Appl. Agric. Res. 1: 12-26.
34. Maas, E. V., Grieve, C. M. 1990. Spike and leaf development in salt-stressed wheat. Crop Sci. 30: 1309-1313.
35. Maas, E. V., Grattan, S. R. 1999. Crop yields as affected by salinity. In: Skaags, R. W., van Schilfgaarde, J., eds. Agricultural Drainage. Agron. Monogr. 38. ASA-CSSA-SSSA. Madison, WI, pp. 615-657.
36. Munns, R., Tester, M. 2008. Mechanisms of salinity tolerance. Annu. Rev. Plant Biol. 59: 651-681.
37. Plett, D. C., Møller, I. S. 2010. Na+ transport in glycophytic plants: what we know and would like to know. Plant Cell Environ. 33: 612-626.
38. Salisbury, F. B. 1995. Units, symbols, terminology for plant physiology. Utah State Univ. Logan, UT.
39. Shillo, R., Ding, M., Pasternak, D., Zaccai, M. 2002. Cultivation of cut flower and bulb species with saline water. Sci. Hortic. 92: 41-54.
40. Skimina, C. A. 1980. Salt tolerance of ornamentals. Proc. Intl. Propag. Soc. 30: 113-118.
41. Skimina, C. A. 1986. Recycling irrigation runoff on container ornamentals. HortScience 21: 32-34.
42. Skimina, C. A. 1992. Recycling water, nutrients and waste in the nursery industry. HortScience 27: 968-971.
43. Sloan, R. C., Harkness, S. S. 2006. Field evaluation of pollen-free sunflower cultivars for cut flower production. Hort-Technology 16: 324-327.
44. Sonneveld, C., Baas, R., Nijssen, M. C., deHoog, J. 1999. Salt tolerance of flower crops grown in soilless culture. J. Plant Nutr. 22: 1033-1048.
45. Steppuhn, H., van Genuchten, M. Th., Grieve, C. M. 2005a. Root-zone salinity: 1. Selecting a product-yield index and response function for crop tolerance. Crop Sci. 45: 209-220.
46. Steppuhn, H., van Genuchten, M. Th., Grieve, C. M. 2005b. Root-zone salinity: II. Indices for tolerance in agricultural crops. Crop Sci. 45: 221-232.
47. Suarez, D. L., Simunek J. 1997. UNSATCHEM: unsaturated water and solute transport model with equilibrium and kinetic chemistry. Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J. 61: 1633-1646.
48. Valdez-Aguilar, L. A., Grieve, C. M., Poss, J. A. 2009a. Salinity and alkaline pH of irrigation water affect marigold plants. I. Growth and shoot dry mass partitioning. HortScience. 44: 1719-1725.
49. Valdez-Aguilar, L. A., Grieve, C. M., Poss, J. A., Layfield, D. A. 2009b. Combination of salinity and alkalinity in irrigation water affect marigold plants: II. Mineral ion relations. HortScience. 44: 1726-1735.
50. Valdez-Aguilar, L. A., Grieve, C. M., Poss, J. A., Mellano, M. A. 2009c. Hypersensitivity of Ranunculus asiaticus to salinity and alkaline pH in irrigation water in sand cultures. HortScience. 44: 138-144.
51. Wang, D. 2002. Dynamics of soil water and temperatures in above ground sand cultures used for screening plant salt tolerance. Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J. 61: 1384-1491.
52. Water Education Foundation. 1992. Layperson's guide to Water recycling and reuse. 16 pp.
53. Zeng, L., Shannon, M. C. 2000. Salinity effects on seedling growth and yield components in rice. Crop Sci. 40: 996-1003.
http://brill.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journals/10.1560/ijps.59.2-4.187
Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1560/ijps.59.2-4.187
2011-05-18
2018-04-23

Sign-in

Can't access your account?
  • Tools

  • Add to Favorites
  • Printable version
  • Email this page
  • Subscribe to ToC alert
  • Get permissions
  • Recommend to your library

    You must fill out fields marked with: *

    Librarian details
    Your details
    Why are you recommending this title?
    Select reason:
     
    Israel Journal of Plant Sciences — Recommend this title to your library
  • Export citations
  • Key

  • Full access
  • Open Access
  • Partial/No accessInformation