Cookies Policy

This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies.

I accept this policy

Find out more here

Honesty of signaling and pollinator attraction: The case of flag-like bracts

No metrics data to plot.
The attempt to load metrics for this article has failed.
The attempt to plot a graph for these metrics has failed.
The full text of this article is not currently available.

Brill’s MyBook program is exclusively available on BrillOnline Books and Journals. Students and scholars affiliated with an institution that has purchased a Brill E-Book on the BrillOnline platform automatically have access to the MyBook option for the title(s) acquired by the Library. Brill MyBook is a print-on-demand paperback copy which is sold at a favorably uniform low price.

Access this article

+ Tax (if applicable)
Add to Favorites
You must be logged in to use this functionality

image of Israel Journal of Plant Sciences

Bracts are nonfloral showy structures associated with inflorescences. They are generally thought to enhance plant reproductive success by attracting pollinating insects. We investigated whether flag-like bracts at the top of inflorescences are reliable signals of floral food reward for pollinators in Salvia viridis L. Field and greenhouse data indicate incomplete synchrony between the development of flowers and bracts. Various measures of bract size, however, positively correlate with the number of open flowers on the inflorescence, and with their nectar rewards. Experimental removal of bracts from inflorescences significantly reduced honeybee visitation in the field. We compare these findings with field data on Lavandula stoechas L., another labiate species with flag-like displays. The number of open flowers in L. stoechas cannot be reliably predicted from the presence or size of the bracts. Bract clipping does not significantly reduce honeybee visits in this species. We suggest that bees learn to orient to bracts if they reliably signal food rewards and to disregard bracts if they provide unreliable signals. Asynchronous development of bracts and floral rewards can reduce the reliability of the signals and may explain the rarity of flaglike displays in pollination systems. We discuss additional selective forces that may favor bract displays.

Affiliations: 1: Department of Evolution, Systematics and Ecology, and the Center for Rationality, The Hebrew University of Jerusalem ; 2: Department of Life Sciences, Achva College ; 3: Environmental Education Program, Kibbutzim College of Education ; 4: Department of Evolution, Systematics and Ecology, and the Center for Rationality, The Hebrew University of Jerusalem


Full text loading...


Data & Media loading...

1. Alon, A. 1990. Israel's fauna and flora: flowering plants. Peli, Ramat Gan (in Hebrew).
2. Armbruster, W.S. 2002. Can indirect selection and genetic context contribute to trait diversification? A transitionprobability study of blossom-colour evolution in two genera. J. Evol. Biol.15: 468-486.
3. Armbruster, W.S., Antonsen, L., Pélabon, C. 2005. Phenotypic selection on blossoms in an African Dalechampia: honest signaling, visitation rates, and cross-pollination success. Ecology86: 3323-3333.
4. Barth, F.G. 1985. Insects and flowers: the biology of a partnership. Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ. 297 pp.
5. Bell, G. 1985. On the function of flowers. Proc. R. Soc. London B224: 223-265.
6. Borges, R.M., Gowda, V., Zacharias, M. 2003. Butterfly pollination and high-contrast visual signals in a low-density distylous plant. Oecologia136: 571-573.
7. Chittka, L., Thomson, J.D., eds. 2001. Cognitive ecology of pollination—animal behavior and floral evolution. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
8. Cohen, D., Shmida, A. 1993. The evolution of flower display and reward. Evol. Biol.27: 197-243.
9. Dafni, A. 1984. Mimicry and deception in pollination. Annu. Rev. Ecol. Syst.15: 259-278.
10. Davis, P.H. 1982. Flora of Turkey, Vol. 7. Edinburgh University Press, Edinburgh, UK.
11. Devesa, T.A., Arroyo, J., Herrera, J. 1985. Contribution to the knowledge of the floral biology of the genus Lavandula. An. Jard. Bot. Madrid42: 165-186 (in Spanish).
12. Faegri, K., van der Pijl, L. 1979. The principles of pollination ecology. Pergamon Press, London.
13. Feinbrun-Dothan, N. 1978. Flora Palaestina III. Israel Academy of Sciences and Humanities, Jerusalem, Israel.
14. Galen, C., Cuba, J. 2001. Down the tube: pollinators, predators, and the evolution of flower shape in the alpine skypilot, Polemonium viscosum.Evolution55: 1963-1971.
15. Giurfa, M., Lehrer, M. 2001. Honey bee vision and floral displays: from detection to close-up recognition. In: Chittka, L., Thomson, J.D., eds. Cognitive ecology of pollination: animal behavior and floral evolution. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp. 61-82.
16. Gigord, L.D.B., Macnair, M.R., Stritesky, M., Smithson, A. 2002. The potential for floral mimicry in rewardless orchids: an experimental study. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B269: 1389-1395.
17. Gottsberger, G., Hartmann, U. 1988. Flag-blossom and longlasting flowers: a strategy for effective pollinator attraction in the Mediterranean region and in Atlantic Portugal. Lagascalia15: 635-641.
18. Grant, K.A., Grant, V. 1964. Mechanical isolation of Salvia apiana and Salvia mellifera (Labiatae). Evolution18: 196-212.
19. Herrera, J. 1993. Blooming times of individual inflorescences and plants as determinants of flower and fruit predation in Lavandula stoechas (Lamiaceae). Acta Oecolog.14: 867-874.
20. Herrera, J. 1997. The role of colored accessory bracts in the reproductive biology of Lavandula stoechas.Ecology78: 494-504.
21. Heywood, 1978. Flowering plants of the world. Oxford University Press, Oxford.
22. Knuth, P. 1898. Handbuch der Blutenbilogie. Vol 5. Verlag von Wilhelm Ingelmann, Leipzig.
23. Kudoh, H., Whigham, D.F. 1998. The effect of petal size manipulation on pollinator/seed-predator mediated female reproductive success of Hibiscus moscheutos.Oecologia117: 70-79.
24. Lewis, A.C., Lipani, G.A. 1990. Learning and flower use in butterflies: hypothesis from honey-bees. In: Bernays, E.A., ed. Insect-plant interactions. CRC Press, Boca Raton, Fl, pp. 95-110.
25. Meeuse, B., Meeuse, S. 1984. The sex life of flowers. Facts on File Publ., New York, 152 pp.
26. Meikle, R.D. 1985. Flora of Cyprus, Vol. 2. Royal Botanic Gardens, Kew.
27. Menzel, R. 1985. Learning in honeybees in an ecological and behavioral context. In: Hölldobler, B., Lindauer, M., eds. Experimental behavioral ecology. Gustav Fischer Verlag, Stuttgart, pp. 55-74.
28. Menzel, R., Shmida, A. 1993. The ecology of flower colors and the natural color vision of insect pollinators: the Israel flora as a case study. Biol. Rev.68: 81-120.
29. Muller, H. 1873. The fertilization of flowers. MacMillan Press and Co., London.
30. Proctor, M., Yeo, P., Lack, A. 1996. The natural history of pollination. Harper Collins, Hampshire, UK.
31. Schiestl, F.P. 2004. Floral evolution and pollinator mate choice in a sexually deceptive orchid. J. Evol. Biol.17: 67-75.
32. Vaknin, Y., Yom-Tov, Y., Eisikowitch, D. 1996. Flowering seasonality and flower characteristics of Loranthus acaciae Zucc. (Loranthaceae): implications for advertisement and bird-pollination. Sex. Plant Rep.9: 279-285.
33. Waser, N.M. 1983. The adaptive nature of floral traits: ideas and evidence. In: Real, L.A., ed. Pollination biology. Academic Press, New York, pp. 241-285.
34. Wehner, R., Menzel, R. 1990. Do insects have cognitive maps? Annu. Rev. Neurosci.13: 403-414.

Article metrics loading...



Can't access your account?
  • Tools

  • Add to Favorites
  • Printable version
  • Email this page
  • Subscribe to ToC alert
  • Get permissions
  • Recommend to your library

    You must fill out fields marked with: *

    Librarian details
    Your details
    Why are you recommending this title?
    Select reason:
    Israel Journal of Plant Sciences — Recommend this title to your library
  • Export citations
  • Key

  • Full access
  • Open Access
  • Partial/No accessInformation