Cookies Policy
X

This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies.

I accept this policy

Find out more here

Diurnal Refuge Competition in the Freshwater Prawn, Macrobrachium Australiense

No metrics data to plot.
The attempt to load metrics for this article has failed.
The attempt to plot a graph for these metrics has failed.
The full text of this article is not currently available.

Brill’s MyBook program is exclusively available on BrillOnline Books and Journals. Students and scholars affiliated with an institution that has purchased a Brill E-Book on the BrillOnline platform automatically have access to the MyBook option for the title(s) acquired by the Library. Brill MyBook is a print-on-demand paperback copy which is sold at a favorably uniform low price.

This Article is currently unavailable for purchase.
Add to Favorites
You must be logged in to use this functionality

Cover image Placeholder

Abstract This study examined important stimuli influencing agonistic conspecific pairs of Macrobrachium australiense and how these affected diurnal refuge usage. The results demonstrated key behaviours underlying refuge competition, and have ramifications for how we view the link between conspecific competition and exposure to predation. Different levels of vegetation stalk density were employed to examine the effects of increased refuge quality on the hierarchical interaction. The data analysis demonstrated that the prawns were responding to nearby stimuli which altered detectability, e.g., vegetation density, conspecific size, conspecific movement. Dominants and subordinates both responded to the same stimuli, however, the behavioural response was different. Increasing subordinate size lead to increased dominant activity in all refuges, irrespective of vegetation density. Increasing dominant size caused an increase in subordinate activity in high density refugia but a reduction in low density refugia. The increased activity lead to an overall increase in time spent outside of the refuge for all individuals. Subordinates spent substantially more time outside of the refuge than the dominant individuals. As such refuge competition biases the exposure of individuals to risk, localised changes to this bias, i.e., the size of neighbouring conspecifics, can influence this risk and determine the vulnerability of specific demographics, i.e., smaller individuals, to predation.

Affiliations: 1: a School of Biological Sciences, University of Queensland, St. Lucia, QLD 4072, Australia

10.1651/08-3093.1
/content/journals/10.1651/08-3093.1
dcterms_title,pub_keyword,dcterms_description,pub_author
10
5
Loading
Loading

Full text loading...

/content/journals/10.1651/08-3093.1
Loading

Data & Media loading...

http://brill.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journals/10.1651/08-3093.1
Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1651/08-3093.1
2017-08-22

Sign-in

Can't access your account?
  • Key

  • Full access
  • Open Access
  • Partial/No accessInformation