Cookies Policy

This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies.

I accept this policy

Find out more here

Evaluation of a Crayfish Burrowing Chamber Design With Simulated Groundwater Flow

No metrics data to plot.
The attempt to load metrics for this article has failed.
The attempt to plot a graph for these metrics has failed.
The full text of this article is not currently available.

Brill’s MyBook program is exclusively available on BrillOnline Books and Journals. Students and scholars affiliated with an institution that has purchased a Brill E-Book on the BrillOnline platform automatically have access to the MyBook option for the title(s) acquired by the Library. Brill MyBook is a print-on-demand paperback copy which is sold at a favorably uniform low price.

This Article is currently unavailable for purchase.
Add to Favorites
You must be logged in to use this functionality

Cover image Placeholder

Abstract Crayfish are a highly diverse group of freshwater crustaceans with great ecological and economic importance. Many species construct terrestrial burrows within which they reproduce, overwinter, and/or avoid desiccation. Basic life-history and environmental tolerance information is still lacking for many species, particularly in regards to terrestrial portion(s) of their life cycle. In this paper we present and evaluate a design for a crayfish burrowing chamber that allows for experimental control of burrowing conditions, including substrate, groundwater height and flow, as well as direct observation of burrow construction and measurement of groundwater quality. Results of evaluation assays with Cambarus striatus, a widespread secondary burrower native to the southeastern United States show that chambers are amenable to studies examining burrowing behavior, survivorship, growth and water quality. Water table height was easily manipulated in chambers. Seepage rates were strongly affected by substrate type: burrows in coarse substrate filled rapidly but collapsed quickly whereas burrows in fine substrates filled very slowly and did not collapse. Cambarus striatus burrowed readily in fine substrate, produced complex burrows with chimneys, and exhibited high survivorship and positive growth over a 4 week period. Ammonia levels were higher in burrows than in the groundwater flowing through the chambers, but did not significantly affect growth or survivorship of C. striatus. Maximum burrow depth was significantly affected by substrate type, but not presence/absence of chelipeds. Suggested improvements include larger chamber size and the use of mesh barriers to keep crayfish from burrowing against the inner chamber walls.

Affiliations: 1: 203 Swingle Hall, Department of Fisheries and Allied Aquacultures, Auburn University, Auburn, Alabama 36849, U.S.A; 2: Department of Biological Sciences, Auburn University, Auburn, Alabama 36849, U.S.A


Full text loading...


Data & Media loading...

1. Berrill M. , Chenoweth B. 1982 "The burrowing ability of nonburrowing crayfish" American Midland Naturalist Vol 108 199 201
2. Charlebois P. M. , Lamberti G. A. 1996 "Invading crayfish in a Michigan stream: Direct and indirect effects on periphyton and macroinvertebrates" Journal of the North American Benthological Society Vol 15 551 563
3. Creed R. P. 1994 "Direct and indirect effects of crayfish grazing in a stream community" Ecology Vol 75 2091 2103
4. Creed R. P. , Reed J. M. 2004 "Ecosystem engineering by crayfish in a headwater stream community" Journal of the North American Benthological Society Vol 23 224 236<0224:EEBCIA>2.0.CO;2
5. DiStefano R. J. , Magoulick D. D. , Imhoff E. , Larson E. R. 2009 "Imperiled crayfish use hyporheic zone during seasonal drying of an intermittent stream" Journal of the North American Benthological Society Vol 28 142 152
6. Dorn N. J. , Volin J. C. 2009 "Resistance of crayfish ( Procambarusspp.) populations to wetland drying depends on species and substrate" Journal of the North American Benthological Society Vol 28 766 777
7. Evans-White M. A. , Dodds W. K. , Whiles M. R. 2003 "Ecosystem significance of crayfishes and stonerollers in a prairie stream: functional differences between co-occurring omnivores" Journal of the North American Benthological Society Vol 22 423 441
8. Girard C. 1852 "A revision of the North American Astaci, with observations on their habits and geographical distribution" Proceedings of the Acadamy of Natural Sciences of Philadelphia Vol 6 87 91
9. Grow L. 1981 "Burrowing behavior in the crayfish, Cambarus diogenes diogenes(Girard)" Animal Behavior Vol 29 351 356
10. Grow L. , Merchant H. 1980 "The burrow habitat of the crayfish, Cambarus diogenes diogenes(Girard)" American Midland Naturalist Vol 103 231 237
11. Hart D. D. 1992 "Community organization in streams – The importance of species interactions, physical factors, and chance" Oecologia Vol 9 220 228
12. Hay W. P. 1902 "Observations of the crustacean fauna of Nickajack Cave, Tennessee, and vicinity" Proceedings of the United States National Museum Vol 25 417 439
13. Helms B. S. , Creed R. P. 2005 "The effects of 2 coexisting crayfish on an Appalachian river community" Journal of the North American Benthological Society Vol 24 113 122<0113:TEOCCO>2.0.CO;2
14. Hobbs H. H. Jr. 1981 The Crayfishes of Georgia Smithsonian Institution Press Washington, D.C., U.S.A pp.
15. Jones S. N. , Bergey E. A. 2007 "Habitat segregation in stream crayfishes: implications for conservation" Journal of the North American Benthological Society Vol 26 134 144[134:HSISCI]2.0.CO;2
16. Lodge D. M. , Lorman J. G. 1987 "Reductions in submersed macrophyte biomass and species richness by the crayfish Orconectes rusticus " Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences Vol 44 591 597
17. Mazlum Y. , Eversole A. G. 2004 "Observations on the life cycle of Procambarus acutus acutusin South Carolina culture ponds" Aquaculture Vol 238 249 261
18. Nakata K. , Hamano T. , Hayashi K. , Kawai T. , Goshima S. 2001 "Artificial burrow preference by the Japanese crayfish Cambaroides japonicus. " Fisheries Science Vol 67 449 455
19. Payette A. L. , McGaw I. J. 2003 "Thermoregulatory behavior of the crayfish Procambarus clarkiin a burrow environment" Comparative Biochemistry and Physiology Part A Vol 136 539 556
20. Pintor L. M. , Soluk D. A. 2006 "Evaluating the non-consumptive, positive effects of a predator in the persistence of an endangered species" Biological Conservation Vol 130 584 591
21. Robson B. , Johnston K. 2009 "Commensalism used by freshwater crayfish species to survive drying in seasonal habitats" Invertebrate Biology Vol 128 269 275
22. Tarr R. S. 1884 "Habits of burrowing crayfishes in the United States" Nature Vol 30 127 128
23. Taylor C. A. , Schuster G. A. , Cooper J. E. , Distefano R. J. , Eversole A. G. , Hamr P. , Hobbs H. H. III , Robison H. W. , Skelton C. E. , Thoma R. F. 2007 "A reassessment of the conservation status of crayfishes of the Unites States and Canada after 10+ years of increased awareness" Fisheries Vol 32 372 389[372:AROTCS]2.0.CO;2
24. Usio N. 2000 "Effects of crayfish on leaf processing and invertebrate colonisation of leaves in a headwater stream: decoupling of a trophic cascade" Oecologia Vol 124 608 614
25. Usio N. , Townsend C. R. 2004 "Roles of crayfish: Consequences of predation and bioturbation for stream invertebrates" Ecology Vol 85 807 822
26. Welch S. M. , Waldron J. L. , Eversole A. G. , Simoes J. C. 2008 "Seasonal variation and ecological effects of Camp Shelby burrowing crayfish ( Fallicambarus gordoni) burrows" American Midland Naturalist Vol 159 378 384[378:SVAEEO]2.0.CO;2
27. Wentworth C. K. 1922 "A scale of grade and class terms for clastic sediments" Journal of Geology Vol 30 377 392
28. Zhang Y. X. , Richardson J. S. , Negishi J. N. 2004 "Detritus processing, ecosystem engineering and benthic diversity: a test of predator-omnivore interference" Journal of Animal Ecology Vol 73 756 766

Article metrics loading...



Can't access your account?
  • Key

  • Full access
  • Open Access
  • Partial/No accessInformation