Cookies Policy
X

This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies.

I accept this policy

Find out more here

Toward the Fragility of Sovereignty: A Reading of Ye Shengtao’s “The Emperor’s New Clothes”

No metrics data to plot.
The attempt to load metrics for this article has failed.
The attempt to plot a graph for these metrics has failed.
The full text of this article is not currently available.

Brill’s MyBook program is exclusively available on BrillOnline Books and Journals. Students and scholars affiliated with an institution that has purchased a Brill E-Book on the BrillOnline platform automatically have access to the MyBook option for the title(s) acquired by the Library. Brill MyBook is a print-on-demand paperback copy which is sold at a favorably uniform low price.

Access this article

+ Tax (if applicable)
Add to Favorites
You must be logged in to use this functionality

image of Frontiers of Literary Studies in China

For a long period Ye Shengtao’s “The Emperor’s New Clothes” has been read as a simple fairytale along with his other fairytale writings. Its politico-philosophical implications thus is blurred by students’ focus on the “historical context” of the 1930s of China, when Ye Shengtao’s fairytales were composed. This essay argues that Ye Shengtao’s “The Emperor’s New Clothes” could be dealt with as a politico-philosophical text, despite or because of the historical context of China at that time which does not provide a political reality corresponding to what is called “sovereignty” in its classical sense in the field of political science. By interpreting Ye Shengtao’s “The Emperor’s New Clothes” from a perspective of conceptual analysis by reading it together with other two stories about the same topic written by Hans Andersen and Juan Manuel, this essay also attempts to read the story against the grain of the history of modern Chinese literature, taking it as an allegory of sovereignty and its fragility, staging it theoretically with philosophical thoughts on sovereignty in the works of, for example, Hobbes, Spinoza, Jacques Derrida, and Giorgio Agamben. While Manuel’s story first puts forth the problematic of sovereignty, Andersen’s version pushes to the extreme the logic of self-legitimation carried out by the narrative of sovereignty. Ye Shengtao’s rewriting, in this textual context, deconstructs this logic and points out a possibility of the politics of democracy.

10.3868/s010-004-015-0011-3
/content/journals/10.3868/s010-004-015-0011-3
dcterms_title,pub_keyword,dcterms_description,pub_author
10
5
Loading
Loading

Full text loading...

/content/journals/10.3868/s010-004-015-0011-3
Loading

Data & Media loading...

http://brill.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journals/10.3868/s010-004-015-0011-3
Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.3868/s010-004-015-0011-3
2015-08-19
2017-11-22

Sign-in

Can't access your account?
  • Tools

  • Add to Favorites
  • Printable version
  • Email this page
  • Subscribe to ToC alert
  • Get permissions
  • Recommend to your library

    You must fill out fields marked with: *

    Librarian details
    Your details
    Why are you recommending this title?
    Select reason:
     
    Frontiers of Literary Studies in China — Recommend this title to your library
  • Export citations
  • Key

  • Full access
  • Open Access
  • Partial/No accessInformation