Cookies Policy
X

This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies.

I accept this policy

Find out more here

Classroom Questioning Tendencies from the Perspective of Big Data

No metrics data to plot.
The attempt to load metrics for this article has failed.
The attempt to plot a graph for these metrics has failed.
The full text of this article is not currently available.

Brill’s MyBook program is exclusively available on BrillOnline Books and Journals. Students and scholars affiliated with an institution that has purchased a Brill E-Book on the BrillOnline platform automatically have access to the MyBook option for the title(s) acquired by the Library. Brill MyBook is a print-on-demand paperback copy which is sold at a favorably uniform low price.

Access this article

+ Tax (if applicable)
Add to Favorites
You must be logged in to use this functionality

image of Frontiers of Education in China

We are now living in an era of big data. From the perspective of data analysis of classroom questioning, the paper chooses three districts in City B that have significant differences. These are educationally developed District D, less developed District F, and developing District M. The study uses the stratified sampling method to choose from three different groups of teachers, namely novice teachers, competent teachers, and experienced teachers, by way of video case analysis, the Item Response Theory (IRT) model method, and the inductive and deductive method, to analyze the characteristics of teachers’ classroom questions. It was found that: (1) In terms of open questioning, all three districts with their different levels in educational development need to improve open questioning levels among their experienced primary school teachers. In middle schools, novice teachers’ open questioning tendency is significantly lower than that of qualified and experienced teachers; (2) From the quantitative study of three kinds of tendencies, the lowest level of the three tendencies in the classroom questions is problem-solving; (3) In the three districts, the experienced and qualified primary school teachers in the developing district has a prominent advantage in raising critical and creative questions, while in the middle schools, novice teachers generally have a lower level than qualified and experienced teachers in raising critical and creative questions. The results of the big data analysis enable us to draw a conclusion about teachers’ value orientation regarding questioning in class. At present, they pay attention to the local value of classroom questioning, but ignore the overall value; pay attention to the instrumental value of classroom questioning, but ignore the objective value; and pay attention to the superficial value of classroom questions, but ignore the underlying value.

Affiliations: 1: Department of Education Technology, Capital Normal University wlcnu@263.net

10.3868/s110-005-016-0013-8
/content/journals/10.3868/s110-005-016-0013-8
dcterms_title,pub_keyword,dcterms_description,pub_author
10
5
Loading
Loading

Full text loading...

/content/journals/10.3868/s110-005-016-0013-8
Loading

Data & Media loading...

http://brill.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journals/10.3868/s110-005-016-0013-8
Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.3868/s110-005-016-0013-8
2016-08-10
2018-06-19

Sign-in

Can't access your account?
  • Tools

  • Add to Favorites
  • Printable version
  • Email this page
  • Subscribe to ToC alert
  • Get permissions
  • Recommend to your library

    You must fill out fields marked with: *

    Librarian details
    Your details
    Why are you recommending this title?
    Select reason:
     
    Frontiers of Education in China — Recommend this title to your library
  • Export citations
  • Key

  • Full access
  • Open Access
  • Partial/No accessInformation